Not A Single Active Democrat Attended the Jerusalem Embassy Ceremony

[Linkiloo]

Time for a shake up. The whole world is pandering to the terrorists and didn't want to rock the boat. They forget that pandering to terror doesn't get any results either, as we've seen. A change is as good as a holiday.

 

[Issa]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Apart from the evangelicals and the Zionists no one agrees with the move. You both are the scrums of earth.

Why would you disagree with the move?

It incites instability in the region. With all due respect your questions stems from ignorance that plagues most conservatives (war mongers) about the middle east crisis.

 

[Theowl32]

Yes I can believe that the Judeo Christian hating Democratic Party would not show up at such a monumental ceremony...

More like the Jews who hate Christians called the Israelis.

I am sick of your pathetic shit.

 

[Theowl32]

American Jews have supported the DimocRATs since before WWII. I cannot, for the life of me, understand why they continue to do so.

Jewish Members of U.S. Congress: 115th Congress
(2017-2019)
@ Jewish Members of the 114th Congress

Senate
(8 Democrats, 1 Independent)

Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Benjamin Cardin (D-MD)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Al Franken (D-MN)
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Bernard Sanders (I-VT)
Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)

House
(21 Democrats, 2 Republican)

David Cicilline (D-RI)
Stephen Cohen (D-TN)
Susan Davis (D-CA)
Ted Deutch (D-FL)
Eliot Engel (D-NY)
Lois Frankel (D-FL)
Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
Steve Israel (D-NY)
David Kutsoff (R-TN)
Sander Levin (D-MI)
Alan Lowenthal (D-CA)
Nita Lowey (D-NY)
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Jared Polis (D-CO)
Jamie Raskin (D-MD)
Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Brad Sherman (D-CA)
Brad Schneider (D-IL)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
John Yarmuth (D-KY)
Lee Zeldin (R-NY)*

Those are not Jews. Those are the enemies to the land of Canaan and the ones that Polish annoying anti-semite keeps referring to.

They are the wolves in sheeps clothing. Nearly all of them are commie sympathizers and descendants of jews and Marxist followers that emigrated here from mother Russia at the turn of the 20th century.

Most American Jews identify as left wing before they identify as Jews.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Apart from the evangelicals and the Zionists no one agrees with the move. You both are the scrums of earth.

Why would you disagree with the move?

It incites instability in the region. With all due respect your questions stems from ignorance that plagues most conservatives (war mongers) about the middle east crisis.

lol In other words you don't know why you oppose it.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2000.

The "bloodbath that it caused"?! That's the talking point being peddled by Al Qaeda, ISIS, the PA, etc., etc.

And if you think the only "noteworthy" thing about the embassy move was the intolerant, bigoted reaction of Palestinian/Arab thugs, I am not surprised that you're peddling the radical Muslim line about the move.

Lieberman left the party and is a Trump sheep. He is not a Democrat. And a building moving to some "magical" city is only noteworthy to believe who believe that crap.

You seem rather hate filled and unhappy.... (your posts)

... not much of a salesman for the soul-less, anti-American, biased morality, fake news liberal way....

 

[otto105]

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

 

[Theowl32]

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Well, you fucking gasbags have been wrong about everything, especially about Trump. I mean wrong, about everything too. It is amazing actually.

So, based on how pathetic you all are, and based the fact you stupid ass morons have ruined the world with all of your stupid PC bullshit, I will assume you are wrong about this too.

 

[otto105]

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

By siding with Israel we have lost the ability to be a negotiator, plus the fact that our orange monkey president doesn't know how to do it.

Are YOU ignorant enough to believe that we are?

 

[otto105]

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Well, you fucking gasbags have been wrong about everything, especially about Trump. I mean wrong, about everything too. It is amazing actually.

So, based on how pathetic you all are, and based the fact you stupid ass morons have ruined the world with all of your stupid PC bullshit, I will assume you are wrong abou this too.

You better check the diaper that you're wearing. Seems likely a load was passed.


Good for you.

 

[toomuchtime_]

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

By siding with Israel we have lost the ability to be a negotiator, plus the fact that our orange monkey president doesn't know how to do it.

Are YOU ignorant enough to believe that we are?

Were you not quite so crazy you would understand that the US is the only possible mediator for talks if they ever become possible, and that is why both the Sunni Arabs states and the Europeans have urged Abbas to get over his temper tantrum. Again, if you were able to see what is in front of you, you would notice the Arab states are not all that upset about the embassy move because they understand that it was a logical thing to do, that it does not foreclose on any of the PLO's demands and that Abbas needed a kick in the pants to get him to behave more constructively. Contrary to predictions, there has been no violence over the embassy move and even the rhetoric has been subdued.

Now that President Trump has moved the embassy and everyone has seen there has been little reaction to it, more and more countries will follow suit. Two days after the US embassy moved, Guatemala moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and next Tuesday Paraguay will move its embassy to Jerusalem and it won't be long before some European countries move their embassies to Jerusalem. Obama was just an ambitious politician, but Donald Trump is a leader.

 

[otto105]

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

By siding with Israel we have lost the ability to be a negotiator, plus the fact that our orange monkey president doesn't know how to do it.

Are YOU ignorant enough to believe that we are?

Were you not quite so crazy you would understand that the US is the only possible mediator for talks if they ever become possible, and that is why both the Sunni Arabs states and the Europeans have urged Abbas to get over his temper tantrum. Again, if you were able to see what is in front of you, you would notice the Arab states are not all that upset about the embassy move because they understand that it was a logical thing to do, that it does not foreclose on any of the PLO's demands and that Abbas needed a kick in the pants to get him to behave more constructively. Contrary to predictions, there has been no violence over the embassy move and even the rhetoric has been subdued.

Now that President Trump has moved the embassy and everyone has seen there has been little reaction to it, more and more countries will follow suit. Two days after the US embassy moved, Guatemala moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and next Tuesday Paraguay will move its embassy to Jerusalem and it won't be long before some European countries move their embassies to Jerusalem. Obama was just an ambitious politician, but Donald Trump is a leader.

Sure YOU can say that, but facts again alude you.

Does any other country in the world recognize Israel's jurisdiction over and ownership of Jerusalem?

 

[otto105]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Why would any politician attend a ceremony to recognize a place nobody else does?

 

[Desperado]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Is this some kind of standard requirement?

I was going to ask it attendance was mandatory?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The embassy has been moved to the western part of the city which even the PLO recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, so if the US can be blackmailed by the Arabs into refusing to to move its embassy to a place in Israel that everyone recognizes as sovereign Israeli territory, the US has no credibility with either side. Not moving the embassy was cowardly and unprincipled, and while the US allowed itself to be bullied this way, it could legitimately called itself neutral. Clinton could have argued he was in the middle of trying to close the final status agreement he had forced Israel to negotiate so he wanted to wait just a little longer, and Bush could have argued that he was putting together alliances with Muslims to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama had no excuse and was just flat out anti Israel. This move does not foreclose any of the demands the Arabs have made, so there is no rational basis for their objections, and in fact, aside from the PA, there is very little objection in the Arab world. There is no downside to this move, and the upside is, for the first time in a long time, all the people in the ME can trust the US to behave with principle.

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

By siding with Israel we have lost the ability to be a negotiator, plus the fact that our orange monkey president doesn't know how to do it.

Are YOU ignorant enough to believe that we are?

Were you not quite so crazy you would understand that the US is the only possible mediator for talks if they ever become possible, and that is why both the Sunni Arabs states and the Europeans have urged Abbas to get over his temper tantrum. Again, if you were able to see what is in front of you, you would notice the Arab states are not all that upset about the embassy move because they understand that it was a logical thing to do, that it does not foreclose on any of the PLO's demands and that Abbas needed a kick in the pants to get him to behave more constructively. Contrary to predictions, there has been no violence over the embassy move and even the rhetoric has been subdued.

Now that President Trump has moved the embassy and everyone has seen there has been little reaction to it, more and more countries will follow suit. Two days after the US embassy moved, Guatemala moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and next Tuesday Paraguay will move its embassy to Jerusalem and it won't be long before some European countries move their embassies to Jerusalem. Obama was just an ambitious politician, but Donald Trump is a leader.

Sure YOU can say that, but facts again alude you.

Does any other country in the world recognize Israel's jurisdiction over and ownership of Jerusalem?

I presented the facts,and yes, almost everyone, including the PLO recognizes the western part of Jerusalem where the embassy is located as sovereign Israeli territory.

 

[otto105]

Principle is letting the conservative leader of Israel dictate US policy in the region?

Must be a big tail that hit our negotiation disabled president. Or was it that Netanyahu stroked trump's ego into it.

This move will once again increase Iran's and Russian influence in the region as a Merica has backed out of being a negotiator.

Are you really stupid enough to believe any of that?

By siding with Israel we have lost the ability to be a negotiator, plus the fact that our orange monkey president doesn't know how to do it.

Are YOU ignorant enough to believe that we are?

Were you not quite so crazy you would understand that the US is the only possible mediator for talks if they ever become possible, and that is why both the Sunni Arabs states and the Europeans have urged Abbas to get over his temper tantrum. Again, if you were able to see what is in front of you, you would notice the Arab states are not all that upset about the embassy move because they understand that it was a logical thing to do, that it does not foreclose on any of the PLO's demands and that Abbas needed a kick in the pants to get him to behave more constructively. Contrary to predictions, there has been no violence over the embassy move and even the rhetoric has been subdued.

Now that President Trump has moved the embassy and everyone has seen there has been little reaction to it, more and more countries will follow suit. Two days after the US embassy moved, Guatemala moved its embassy to Jerusalem, and next Tuesday Paraguay will move its embassy to Jerusalem and it won't be long before some European countries move their embassies to Jerusalem. Obama was just an ambitious politician, but Donald Trump is a leader.

Sure YOU can say that, but facts again alude you.

Does any other country in the world recognize Israel's jurisdiction over and ownership of Jerusalem?

I presented the facts,and yes, almost everyone, including the PLO recognizes the western part of Jerusalem where the embassy is located as sovereign Israeli territory.

Again, does any country in the world recognize Israel's jurisdiction over and ownership of the city?

 

[bodecea]

Still wondering how many were required to go...to this opening, or any other opening.....