Not A Single Active Democrat Attended the Jerusalem Embassy Ceremony

[HappyJoy]

American Jews have supported the DimocRATs since before WWII. I cannot, for the life of me, understand why they continue to do so.

Jewish Members of U.S. Congress: 115th Congress
(2017-2019)
@ Jewish Members of the 114th Congress

Senate
(8 Democrats, 1 Independent)

Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Benjamin Cardin (D-MD)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Al Franken (D-MN)
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Bernard Sanders (I-VT)
Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)

House
(21 Democrats, 2 Republican)

David Cicilline (D-RI)
Stephen Cohen (D-TN)
Susan Davis (D-CA)
Ted Deutch (D-FL)
Eliot Engel (D-NY)
Lois Frankel (D-FL)
Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
Steve Israel (D-NY)
David Kutsoff (R-TN)
Sander Levin (D-MI)
Alan Lowenthal (D-CA)
Nita Lowey (D-NY)
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Jared Polis (D-CO)
Jamie Raskin (D-MD)
Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Brad Sherman (D-CA)
Brad Schneider (D-IL)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
John Yarmuth (D-KY)
Lee Zeldin (R-NY)*

Ask Snouter.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2000.

The "bloodbath that it caused"?! That's the talking point being peddled by Al Qaeda, ISIS, the PA, etc., etc.

And if you think the only "noteworthy" thing about the embassy move was the intolerant, bigoted reaction of Palestinian/Arab thugs, I am not surprised that you're peddling the radical Muslim line about the move.

Get a grip. It was an unpopular move among most Democrats, of course they are not going to attend.

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

 

[rightwinger]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Why should Democrats attend the dedication ceremony?

We are just going to shut it down as soon as Trump is gone

 

[toomuchtime_]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

You need to send Hamas a memo because they think they were rioting about their imagined "righto of return" not about the embassy.

Ah the “right of return.” The current centerpiece of the religious madness plagueing that cursed land. How fun.

So the embassy move did not spark any violence except in the minds of Trump critics. Their claim of a "right of return" has virtually no support in the West except for Bernie Sanders.

How many from the West attended the opening? What a show of support

The Europeans think that the fact they are not gassing Jews anymore is a sufficient show of support.

 

[HappyJoy]

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2000.

The "bloodbath that it caused"?! That's the talking point being peddled by Al Qaeda, ISIS, the PA, etc., etc.

And if you think the only "noteworthy" thing about the embassy move was the intolerant, bigoted reaction of Palestinian/Arab thugs, I am not surprised that you're peddling the radical Muslim line about the move.

Get a grip. It was an unpopular move among most Democrats, of course they are not going to attend.

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Why should Democrats attend the dedication ceremony?

We are just going to shut it down as soon as Trump is gone

You're a funny guy. You don't even know why you're opposed to it.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2000.

The "bloodbath that it caused"?! That's the talking point being peddled by Al Qaeda, ISIS, the PA, etc., etc.

And if you think the only "noteworthy" thing about the embassy move was the intolerant, bigoted reaction of Palestinian/Arab thugs, I am not surprised that you're peddling the radical Muslim line about the move.

Get a grip. It was an unpopular move among most Democrats, of course they are not going to attend.

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

 

[BlackFlag]

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

You need to send Hamas a memo because they think they were rioting about their imagined "righto of return" not about the embassy.

Ah the “right of return.” The current centerpiece of the religious madness plagueing that cursed land. How fun.

So the embassy move did not spark any violence except in the minds of Trump critics. Their claim of a "right of return" has virtually no support in the West except for Bernie Sanders.

How many from the West attended the opening? What a show of support

The Europeans think that the fact they are not gassing Jews anymore is a sufficient show of support.

Jews and Israel are not the same thing

 

[toomuchtime_]

You need to send Hamas a memo because they think they were rioting about their imagined "righto of return" not about the embassy.

Ah the “right of return.” The current centerpiece of the religious madness plagueing that cursed land. How fun.

So the embassy move did not spark any violence except in the minds of Trump critics. Their claim of a "right of return" has virtually no support in the West except for Bernie Sanders.

How many from the West attended the opening? What a show of support

The Europeans think that the fact they are not gassing Jews anymore is a sufficient show of support.

Jews and Israel are not the same thing

That's what all the anti semites say.

 

[HappyJoy]

Get a grip. It was an unpopular move among most Democrats, of course they are not going to attend.

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

 

[Borillar]

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

What's done is done. We were never a neutral arbiter anyway. We have always been pro Israel.

 

[HappyJoy]

It demanded it! Stat!

Sorry it was US policy not to move the embassy to Jerusalem until the Palestinian issue was resolved. Both Democrats and Republicans. Why? Because the additional shit this stirs up.

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

What's done is done. We were never a neutral arbiter anyway. We have always been pro Israel.

Oh, certainly leaned in that direction but we never fell flat on our face giving Israel everything it wanted in regards to Palestine.

 

[Timmy]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

Don’t forget the millions of tax dollars for moving and extra security !

 

[otto105]

American Jews have supported the DimocRATs since before WWII. I cannot, for the life of me, understand why they continue to do so.

Jewish Members of U.S. Congress: 115th Congress
(2017-2019)
@ Jewish Members of the 114th Congress

Senate
(8 Democrats, 1 Independent)

Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Benjamin Cardin (D-MD)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Al Franken (D-MN)
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Bernard Sanders (I-VT)
Charles Schumer (D-NY)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)

House
(21 Democrats, 2 Republican)

David Cicilline (D-RI)
Stephen Cohen (D-TN)
Susan Davis (D-CA)
Ted Deutch (D-FL)
Eliot Engel (D-NY)
Lois Frankel (D-FL)
Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ)
Steve Israel (D-NY)
David Kutsoff (R-TN)
Sander Levin (D-MI)
Alan Lowenthal (D-CA)
Nita Lowey (D-NY)
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Jared Polis (D-CO)
Jamie Raskin (D-MD)
Jacky Rosen (D-NV)
Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Brad Sherman (D-CA)
Brad Schneider (D-IL)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
John Yarmuth (D-KY)
Lee Zeldin (R-NY)*

Because your an idiot, from an idiot tribe.

 

[HappyJoy]

Ah the “right of return.” The current centerpiece of the religious madness plagueing that cursed land. How fun.

So the embassy move did not spark any violence except in the minds of Trump critics. Their claim of a "right of return" has virtually no support in the West except for Bernie Sanders.

How many from the West attended the opening? What a show of support

The Europeans think that the fact they are not gassing Jews anymore is a sufficient show of support.

Jews and Israel are not the same thing

That's what all the anti semites say.

Well. no, that's what you say they say.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I sincerely hope that the Jewish-American voting base remembers that in the upcoming elections.

Something like 80% of American Jews do not support moving the embassy.

 

[Borillar]

The Jerusalem embassy act, passed almost unanimously by Congress, demanded the embassy be moved within six months unless the president certified to Congress that the move had to be delayed for national security reasons, and Clinton, Bush and Obama all lied every six months and said the move had to be delayed for another six months for national security reasons. It was never US policy the move would be delayed until there was a final status agreement. Aside from some rhetoric, no shit has been stirred up except in the imaginations of some Trump critics.

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

What's done is done. We were never a neutral arbiter anyway. We have always been pro Israel.

Oh, certainly leaned in that direction but we never fell flat on our face giving Israel everything it wanted in regards to Palestine.

We leaned so far in that direction our faces must have only been an inch from the ground.

 

[HappyJoy]

There were obvious national security implications. For starters the Palestinian issue is a recruiting tool for terrorism.

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

What's done is done. We were never a neutral arbiter anyway. We have always been pro Israel.

Oh, certainly leaned in that direction but we never fell flat on our face giving Israel everything it wanted in regards to Palestine.

We leaned so far in that direction our faces must have only been an inch from the ground.

Yeah well, that last inch cost a lot of lives and it's only day 2.

 

[Borillar]

There were never any national security issues and everything is a recruiting tool for terrorism among the Arabs.

Palestine is a very big issue and a very real recruiting tool. Also moving the embassy to Jerusalem takes us out of the position of being a neutral arbiter. There isn't an upside to moving the embassy for the United States.

What's done is done. We were never a neutral arbiter anyway. We have always been pro Israel.

Oh, certainly leaned in that direction but we never fell flat on our face giving Israel everything it wanted in regards to Palestine.

We leaned so far in that direction our faces must have only been an inch from the ground.

Yeah well, that last inch cost a lot of lives and it's only day 2.

There's millions more where they came from.

 

[skye]

Can you believe that not a single active, serving Democratic politician attended the opening ceremony of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem? Not one. This shows you how radicalized national Democratic politicians have become.

Only retired Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman attended the ceremony, to his great credit.

Two days ago, Lieberman wrote a great editorial in defense of Trump's decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Here it is:

Sen. Joe Lieberman: Why US Embassy Jerusalem move happened and why it matters

Lieberman is not a Democrat, and the only noteworthy thing about the U.S. embassy moving a couple miles down the road is the bloodbath it caused.

Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2000.

The "bloodbath that it caused"?! That's the talking point being peddled by Al Qaeda, ISIS, the PA, etc., etc.

And if you think the only "noteworthy" thing about the embassy move was the intolerant, bigoted reaction of Palestinian/Arab thugs, I am not surprised that you're peddling the radical Muslim line about the move.

Get a grip. It was an unpopular move among most Democrats, of course they are not going to attend.

Twenty three years ago nearly every Democrat in Congress voted for the Jerusalem embassy act, which demanded the US embassy be moved to Jerusalem, so what happened that made them oppose it now? Trump was doing it.

Exactly!

And that only goes to show what hypocrites Demrats are.