Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was an attempt to stop a Constitutional requirement on 1/6 of counting the state certified results, in to the congressional record.Protest not Insurrection. Wasnt an attempt to overthrow.
Wasnt a freaking Pearl Harbor moment.
It is being claimed as that as a politcal attack
Cool narrative, brah!It was an attempt to stop a Constitutional requirement on 1/6 of counting the state certified results, in to the congressional record.
That is not simply a riot....
It meets the definition of insurrection...
It was more than a riot, and less than a revolution...an insurrection attempt to stop a Constitutional duty, of our govt.
Nope, not mentioned in the amendment, zip.He is included in any office of the United states. It was argued by Senators before the amendment vote, with records of such, of why it did not specifically state the president and vice president, and the writers told the Senator that the U.S. sworn office holder in the amendment, included the office of the president and VP.
How was it more than a riot?It was an attempt to stop a Constitutional requirement on 1/6 of counting the state certified results, in to the congressional record.
That is not simply a riot....
It meets the definition of insurrection...
It was more than a riot, and less than a revolution...an insurrection attempt to stop a Constitutional duty, of our govt.
No it requires 20% of the House and Senate now.It's why both parties have electoral voters. Any one can challenge the certification.
Doesn’t say ‘must’"The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted."
Not even wiggle room for the VP to return them unopened and request anything further from the States.
It is, what it is....Cool narrative, brah!
Yep, demofks narrativeIt is, what it is....
It's not what it's not.It is, what it is....
The CiC is the top officer in the military.Don't see Commander in Chief, He is not military. Nor is he part of the Judicial. That is the third part of the constitution, along with the Executive and Congress. How can Trump be both? dude, your finger nails must be totally gone by now.
Hahaha, you really are that stupid aren't you?Doesn’t say ‘must’
Nope, shall does not mean mustShall means must.
May, means there are options.
NopeThe CiC is the top officer in the military.
Because they attempted to stop a Constitutional duty for a joint session of Congress on 1/6.How was it more than a riot?
Hahaha, you really are that stupid aren't you?
englishforlawyers.ca
So why no charge?Because they attempted to stop a Constitutional duty for a joint session of Congress on 1/6.
Nope, shall does not mean must
englishforlawyers.ca
So why no charge?
You're just a bullshitter. You know if you asked for a citation I'd have one.nope, otherwise you would have posted that law.
