Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm pretty sure that a felony conviction can't be used to bar someone from the ballot for President, Senate, or House. I don't think that's been ruled on (AFAIK, it never came up), but if they follow precedent it would be struck down.Agreed. We need to get guidance from SCOTUS on this matter.
I hope they tell the states to just chill. That absent a felony conviction and a state law that prohibits felons from being on the ballot, anyone who meets the constitutional requirements can be on the ballot.
You should be able to vote for anyone you wish to vote for who is otherwise eligible to hold the office.
Trump was not acquitted. A majority of the jury found Trump "guilty".well if you knew due process, you already know that trump was tried and demofks lost the impeachment. Trump was acquitted.
Trump didnt engage in insurrectionYou know Biden didn't engage in insurrection, and Trump did. But since you're a screaming toddler, you can't admit it. All the other kewl kidz are lying, and you don't have the guts to refuse to lie along with them.
Only a representative and a Senator could bring a valid objection. Not the VP.It's why both parties have electoral voters. Any one can challenge the certification.
Your link points out a UNION officer and a confederate who served briefly in the CSA army. As far as can be determined from that article he never held office previously so the 14th would not applyThe precedent has been set: Insurrectionists can serve in US office.
nope, otherwise you would have posted that law.Because the constitution clearly gives to congress, through their lawmaking of the electoral count act, that any controversy with the electoral vote is to be decided by the agreement of both houses of congress.
Actually it's Trump own delay tactics that made it take that long to get the indictments against him. Remember, he said he could not be indicted, subpoenaed or even investigated as a sitting president. Which meant delaying any investigation for years.From the guy who supports that FOUR indictments waited the exact same 2 1/2 years to go to court during the election. And that terrible Trump is delaying!
no, the VP doesn't have to accept them or open them, he can return them unopened and request a recertification.Only a representative and a Senator could bring a valid objection. Not the VP.
That has all changed to and a stricter law is now in place.
holy fk!! folks, you just can't make this shit up anymore. wow!!!!!!Actually it's Trump own delay tactics that made it take that long to get the indictments against him. Remember, he said he could not be indicted, subpoenaed or even investigated as a sitting president. Which meant delaying any investigation for years.
hahahahahahahahahahaha no they didn't, you have screws loose. Postman's post is an example of why no one can hold a honest discussion with demofks.Trump was not acquitted. A majority of the jury found Trump "guilty".
But not the super-majority needed to invoke a punishment.
"....except Senators and Representatives of the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military, and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United States.[6]Didn't see that as an option in the statement you posted. Reread it.
Actually the VP has no authority to throw out bogus election results either. Any and all determinations of which votes to count or not count are to be made by congress, through their objection, and agreement of both houses of congress.The process, not the VP's role as master of Ceremony. He has no constitutional authority to unilaterally throw out certified, valid states election results.
Don't see Commander in Chief, He is not military. Nor is he part of the Judicial. That is the third part of the constitution, along with the Executive and Congress. How can Trump be both? dude, your finger nails must be totally gone by now."....except Senators and Representatives of the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military, and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United States.[6]
everyone knows the Rs simply needs to sue Biden, to get him to change his policies on immigration....if they believe it is illegal.no declaration of an insurrection!!!! what now? You can use the big word until you wipe your ass for the day, it still was never officially charged as anything close to an insurrection. you stand wrong as always.
Its pretty clear it was meant for the civil war time. But its now being used as a hail Mary attack on Trump.The problem is the amendment writers and signers if this section in the amendment, never said it was just for The Civil War insurrection or rebellion participants, and Congress never clarified that section 3, with legislation since it was written....
they are complicit, we know it, that mess would filter back at them. We all know this.everyone knows the Rs simply needs to sue Biden, to get him to change his policies on immigration....if they believe it is illegal.
That is what demofks do, make shit up.No need to make up and create an insurrection that never existed, that no one participated in....
Yet no charges to anyone regarding such a thing. I'm still waiting. Your excuses are weak.Everyone, yes everyone, on 1/6 witnessed the insurrection and were wtnesses to the thousands that participated in it....
Yes, you saw it with your own eyes.
Protest not Insurrection. Wasnt an attempt to overthrow.everyone knows the Rs simply needs to sue Biden, to get him to change his policies on immigration....if they believe it is illegal.
No need to make up and create an insurrection that never existed, that no one participated in....
Everyone, yes everyone, on 1/6 witnessed the insurrection and were wtnesses to the thousands that participated in it....
Yes, you saw it with your own eyes.
He is included in any office of the United states. It was argued by Senators before the amendment vote, with records of such, of why it did not specifically state the president and vice president, and the writers told the Senator that the U.S. sworn office holder in the amendment, included the office of the president and VP.Don't see Commander in Chief, He is not military. Nor is he part of the Judicial. That is the third part of the constitution, along with the Executive and Congress. How can Trump be both? dude, your finger nails must be totally gone by now.
"The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted."no, the VP doesn't have to accept them or open them, he can return them unopened and request a recertification.
Has anyone ever, been charged with insurrection before? Or before section 3 was used to disqualify a candidate?they are complicit, we know it, that mess would filter back at them. We all know this.
That is what demofks do, make shit up.
Yet no charges to anyone regarding such a thing. I'm still waiting. Your excuses are weak.
