NPC Memes Driving Moonbats Even Battier

[hadit]

we would use more memes instead of political satire?

You wouldn't promote PC culture.

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

 

[boedicca]

You wouldn't promote PC culture.

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

 

[danielpalos]

if it weren't for memes the right wing would have no arguments at all.

If Progressives had any sense of humor....

we would use more memes instead of political satire?

You wouldn't promote PC culture.

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

Nor are meaningless stock phrases repeated over and over again, but that's never stopped you.

Proof positive, the right wing, Never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

You wouldn't promote PC culture.

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

Capital still has to circulate; rent, needs to be paid. Groceries need to be purchased. Why does the right wing allege to care about the poor and how hard they have to work to make their money?

 

[danielpalos]

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural but Institutional rate of unemployment.

 

[hadit]

depends on the situation. memes and satire are no substitute for a good argument.

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

Capital still has to circulate; rent, needs to be paid. Groceries need to be purchased. Why does the right wing allege to care about the poor and how hard they have to work to make their money?

You don't want them to have to work at all.

 

[boedicca]

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural but Institutional rate of unemployment.

B'loney. You are just a silly knigget.

 

[danielpalos]

I haven't seen any good arguments coming from the Left in a very long time.

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

Capital still has to circulate; rent, needs to be paid. Groceries need to be purchased. Why does the right wing allege to care about the poor and how hard they have to work to make their money?

You don't want them to have to work at all.

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. they could be doing other things than Having to be cronies for Capital.

 

[Oddball]

It has hit the streets!

 

[danielpalos]

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural but Institutional rate of unemployment.

B'loney. You are just a silly knigget.

lol. i have the valid argument.

 

[Oddball]

Quit derailing the thread, dickweed.

 

[EverCurious]

danielpalos The left is not for "solving" 'simple' poverty. They use it as a means for election like every other bullshit superficial belief they spout to you fools.

No poverty is 'simple' the reasons it happens are complex, varied, and often problematic. Which is why a bullshit one size fits 'most' "solution" isn't actually a solution at all, it's a diseased band-aid of a "vote for me" bribe, that you're apparently to 'simple' to see through.

You want to actually 'solve' poverty, then you /only/ help those who cannot help themselves, the disabled, the sick, the dying. The rest of them you insist carry their own weight, at best you educate them toward a legitimate career path, maybe help them get back on their feet during that time. IF they refuse or neglect that help, then fuck em, they've chosen their bed, let them lay in it.

 

[danielpalos]

Quit derailing the thread, dickweed.

doesn't count without a meme.

 

[danielpalos]

danielpalos The left is not for "solving" 'simple' poverty. They use it as a means for election like every other bullshit superficial belief they spout to you fools.

No poverty is 'simple' the reasons it happens are complex, varied, and often problematic. Which is why a bullshit one size fits 'most' "solution" isn't actually a solution at all, it's a band-aid of a "vote for me" bribe, that you're apparently to 'simple' to see through.

You want to actually 'solve' poverty, then you /only/ help those who cannot help themselves, the disabled, the sick, the dying. The rest of them you insist carry their own weight, at best you educate them toward a legitimate career path, maybe help them get back on their feet during that time. IF they refuse or neglect that help, then fuck em, they've chosen their bed, let them lay in it.

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed; how does that not solve simple poverty for merely unemployed, potential labor.

 

[EverCurious]

danielpalos The left is not for "solving" 'simple' poverty. They use it as a means for election like every other bullshit superficial belief they spout to you fools.

No poverty is 'simple' the reasons it happens are complex, varied, and often problematic. Which is why a bullshit one size fits 'most' "solution" isn't actually a solution at all, it's a band-aid of a "vote for me" bribe, that you're apparently to 'simple' to see through.

You want to actually 'solve' poverty, then you /only/ help those who cannot help themselves, the disabled, the sick, the dying. The rest of them you insist carry their own weight, at best you educate them toward a legitimate career path, maybe help them get back on their feet during that time. IF they refuse or neglect that help, then fuck em, they've chosen their bed, let them lay in it.

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed; how does that not solve simple poverty for merely unemployed, potential labor.

Throwing money at a problem is not a solution simpleton. You are literally saying 'hey government, you should take money from those who are productive and pay taxes and use it to pay people simply for being born!'

How about instead of treating business owners like an enemy fucking piggy bank - reaching in the pockets of businesses to steal their money, and forcing them to pay for people who do literally fucking nothing for their company, nor the country at large, you instead incentiveize them to hire on unemployed folks with tax breaks (like say property taxes or licensing fee reductions)?

 

[boedicca]

the left is for solving simple poverty so even the Poor can afford to participate in our market based, capital economy.

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

Capital still has to circulate; rent, needs to be paid. Groceries need to be purchased. Why does the right wing allege to care about the poor and how hard they have to work to make their money?

You don't want them to have to work at all.

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. they could be doing other things than Having to be cronies for Capital.

So? Would you prefer to live as a slave or a serf where you are given subsistence rations for 100% full employment?

Jeebus. You are so historically and economically illiterate.

 

[boedicca]

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural but Institutional rate of unemployment.

B'loney. You are just a silly knigget.

lol. i have the valid argument.

No, you don't. But think that if it gives you comfort while you polish your participation trophies for T-ball.

 

[danielpalos]

danielpalos The left is not for "solving" 'simple' poverty. They use it as a means for election like every other bullshit superficial belief they spout to you fools.

No poverty is 'simple' the reasons it happens are complex, varied, and often problematic. Which is why a bullshit one size fits 'most' "solution" isn't actually a solution at all, it's a band-aid of a "vote for me" bribe, that you're apparently to 'simple' to see through.

You want to actually 'solve' poverty, then you /only/ help those who cannot help themselves, the disabled, the sick, the dying. The rest of them you insist carry their own weight, at best you educate them toward a legitimate career path, maybe help them get back on their feet during that time. IF they refuse or neglect that help, then fuck em, they've chosen their bed, let them lay in it.

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed; how does that not solve simple poverty for merely unemployed, potential labor.

Throwing money at a problem is not a solution simpleton. You are literally saying 'hey government, you should take money from those who are productive and pay taxes and use it to pay people simply for being born!'

How about instead of treating business owners like an enemy fucking piggy bank - reaching in the pockets of businesses to steal their money, and forcing them to pay for people who do literally fucking nothing for their company, nor the country at large, you instead incentiveize them to hire on unemployed folks with tax breaks (like say property taxes or licensing fee reductions)?

what You claim happens anyway. solving for simple poverty ensures the unemployed can still circulate capital and contribute to a positive multiplier effect; means testing is a drag on economic mobility.

 

[danielpalos]

No. The programs the Left promotes actually create more poverty, bub.

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

Capital still has to circulate; rent, needs to be paid. Groceries need to be purchased. Why does the right wing allege to care about the poor and how hard they have to work to make their money?

You don't want them to have to work at all.

capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. they could be doing other things than Having to be cronies for Capital.

So? Would you prefer to live as a slave or a serf where you are given subsistence rations for 100% full employment?

Jeebus. You are so historically and economically illiterate.

you advocate wage slavery not economic freedom via equality and equal protection of the law.

 

[danielpalos]

He's angling to go into one of his pet things, paying people $14/hr who choose not to work.

And then giving them an additional $500 per month for free.

Compensation for Capitalism's natural but Institutional rate of unemployment.

B'loney. You are just a silly knigget.

lol. i have the valid argument.

No, you don't. But think that if it gives you comfort while you polish your participation trophies for T-ball.

yes, I do. You all have Nothing but simple rejection not Any form of Valid rebuttal.