Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??We're not losing. We can't loose if we don't play. When we participate in these conflicts we are doing exactly what our enemies want us to do.If Obama turned the war around why are we losing?The fact that we were losing.9788655Obama ignores every adverse thing until he has no choice but deal with it. It's the MO of his presidency. He's too busy shooting hoops, sinking balls, and raising money to focus on much else.
What was ignored when he tripled the number of troops in Afghanistan and reversed the Taliban's momentum after six years of endless drift under Bush?
Next
The fact that the US had been losing in Afghanistan for five years under Bush's command is precisely why Obama tripled the number of troops and turned the whole lost war around. Petraeus will tell you that. Obama ignored nothing in Afghanistan from the first days in office until now. Obama has ignored nothing in Iraq. Its right wing bs that Obama should take orders from the likes of Maliki as Bush had to kiss his ass for the last two years he was in office. If you want to call Obama's position on Maliki 'ignoring' him - then that was the right thing to do. Now he's gone. And Iraq will be better off for it.
If Obama turned the war around why are we losing?
ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
Where have you been?
You ought to listen to our Commander in Chief:
Obama to leave 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan
Obama to leave 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan - The Washington Post
US General Says Afghan Victory Coming. - February 10, 2013 3:53 PM
US General Says Afghan Victory Coming
The person that throws the first stone is going to be blamed for all that follows which is why a president should consider their options very carefully before launching the country into a war of choice.The Left is hell bent on blaming Iraq and ISIS on Bush. The Blame Bush Card is getting almost as tired as the Race Card. The Left yearns for the days of Saddam. The Left needs to review History and facts to see that removing Saddam and regime change was an initiative with unified support by both Democrats and Republicans well prior to Bush taking office. I never thought Saddam had a role in 9/11 but feel as strong as I did then as I do today that Saddam seeing what primitive pigs could punch US only served to embolden him. The World (UN) was against US removing Saddam because many nations were undermining US by profiting from Oil for Food. A regime change simply met no more profits. Take profits from someone, of course you are going to be hated and disliked.
Bush win the war. Obama lost it. Pretty simple. Had Obama had the guts to negotiate the SOF we wouldn't be going back into Iraq this very minute.Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
If Bush's surge was a total success why did the success not hold.
Look at the way you ignorantly think. Bush's surge you consider a success until he left office. So Obama's surge under the direction of the same general will be a success through 2016. Then if it does not hold the failure goes to the next president.
A SecDef trumps a general.ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
So you think a US General knows less than you:
Where have you been?
You ought to listen to our Commander in Chief:
Obama to leave 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan
Obama to leave 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan - The Washington Post
US General Says Afghan Victory Coming. - February 10, 2013 3:53 PM
US General Says Afghan Victory Coming
Well, I agree with part of your post. The Taliban is as strong today as it every was. The reason being the present of the US is the catalyst needed to to raise funds, recruit fighters, and fill the media with anti-American propaganda.ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??We're not losing. We can't loose if we don't play. When we participate in these conflicts we are doing exactly what our enemies want us to do.If Obama turned the war around why are we losing?The fact that we were losing.9788655 What was ignored when he tripled the number of troops in Afghanistan and reversed the Taliban's momentum after six years of endless drift under Bush?
Next
The fact that the US had been losing in Afghanistan for five years under Bush's command is precisely why Obama tripled the number of troops and turned the whole lost war around. Petraeus will tell you that. Obama ignored nothing in Afghanistan from the first days in office until now. Obama has ignored nothing in Iraq. Its right wing bs that Obama should take orders from the likes of Maliki as Bush had to kiss his ass for the last two years he was in office. If you want to call Obama's position on Maliki 'ignoring' him - then that was the right thing to do. Now he's gone. And Iraq will be better off for it.
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
So having our army there fighting the Taliban has made them stronger.Well, I agree with part of your post. The Taliban is as strong today as it every was. The reason being the present of the US is the catalyst needed to to raise funds, recruit fighters, and fill the media with anti-American propaganda.ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??We're not losing. We can't loose if we don't play. When we participate in these conflicts we are doing exactly what our enemies want us to do.If Obama turned the war around why are we losing?The fact that we were losing.
Next
The fact that the US had been losing in Afghanistan for five years under Bush's command is precisely why Obama tripled the number of troops and turned the whole lost war around. Petraeus will tell you that. Obama ignored nothing in Afghanistan from the first days in office until now. Obama has ignored nothing in Iraq. Its right wing bs that Obama should take orders from the likes of Maliki as Bush had to kiss his ass for the last two years he was in office. If you want to call Obama's position on Maliki 'ignoring' him - then that was the right thing to do. Now he's gone. And Iraq will be better off for it.
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
No, I didn't say stronger. I agreed with your comment, "The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived."So having our army there fighting the Taliban has made them stronger.Well, I agree with part of your post. The Taliban is as strong today as it every was. The reason being the present of the US is the catalyst needed to to raise funds, recruit fighters, and fill the media with anti-American propaganda.ROFLMFAO!!! You really believe that crap??We're not losing. We can't loose if we don't play. When we participate in these conflicts we are doing exactly what our enemies want us to do.If Obama turned the war around why are we losing?The fact that the US had been losing in Afghanistan for five years under Bush's command is precisely why Obama tripled the number of troops and turned the whole lost war around. Petraeus will tell you that. Obama ignored nothing in Afghanistan from the first days in office until now. Obama has ignored nothing in Iraq. Its right wing bs that Obama should take orders from the likes of Maliki as Bush had to kiss his ass for the last two years he was in office. If you want to call Obama's position on Maliki 'ignoring' him - then that was the right thing to do. Now he's gone. And Iraq will be better off for it.
The Taliban is every bit as strong as the day we arrived. As soon as we leave they'll be back in power in Kabul. This is why the US has been negotiating with them.
Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
Is that your final answer?
Bush win the war. Obama lost it. Pretty simple. Had Obama had the guts to negotiate the SOF we wouldn't be going back into Iraq this very minute.Obama's surge was a total failure, as much as Bush's was a total success.
If Bush's surge was a total success why did the success not hold.
Look at the way you ignorantly think. Bush's surge you consider a success until he left office. So Obama's surge under the direction of the same general will be a success through 2016. Then if it does not hold the failure goes to the next president.
