NYT: Sneaky Republican Racists Have an Underhanded Line of Attack on Kamala Harris - Pointing Out Her Unpopular Leftwing Positions on Important Issues

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
95,151
67,353
Why did Trump make this "accusation"? Might have been because it was Kumala's constantly-repeated position... until three minutes ago, when she realized Pennsylvania is a state she needs to win.

“When she ran for president the first time, Kamala Harris darted to the left as she fought for attention from the Democratic Party's liberal wing.
After she dropped out, social and racial justice protests swept across the country in the summer of 2020, and Ms. Harris joined other Democrats in supporting progressive ideas during what appeared to be a national realignment on criminal justice.

One presidential cycle later, with Vice President Harris less than a week into another race for the White House, video clips of her old statements and interviews are being weaponized as Republicans aim to define her as a left-wing radical who is out of step with swing voters.”

1722381983676.jpeg



CNN:

“Vice President Kamala Harris voiced support for "defund the police" in a radio interview in June 2020 amidst nationwide protests for police reform, just months before denouncing the movement after she had joined the Biden presidential campaign.”

Ben Shapiro @benshapiro Positions on which Kamala Harris has supposedly reversed herself:
Banning fracking ❌
Assault weapons mandatory buyback ❌
Ending private health insurance ❌
Decriminalizing illegal border crossings ❌
Bailing out rioters ❌
Defunding the police ❌
Jailing marijuana offenders ❌

This list goes on. She's a liar.


 
Why did Trump make this "accusation"? Might have been because it was Kumala's constantly-repeated position... until three minutes ago, when she realized Pennsylvania is a state she needs to win.

“When she ran for president the first time, Kamala Harris darted to the left as she fought for attention from the Democratic Party's liberal wing.
After she dropped out, social and racial justice protests swept across the country in the summer of 2020, and Ms. Harris joined other Democrats in supporting progressive ideas during what appeared to be a national realignment on criminal justice.

One presidential cycle later, with Vice President Harris less than a week into another race for the White House, video clips of her old statements and interviews are being weaponized as Republicans aim to define her as a left-wing radical who is out of step with swing voters.”

View attachment 987186


CNN:

“Vice President Kamala Harris voiced support for "defund the police" in a radio interview in June 2020 amidst nationwide protests for police reform, just months before denouncing the movement after she had joined the Biden presidential campaign.”

Ben Shapiro @benshapiro Positions on which Kamala Harris has supposedly reversed herself:
Banning fracking ❌
Assault weapons mandatory buyback ❌
Ending private health insurance ❌
Decriminalizing illegal border crossings ❌
Bailing out rioters ❌
Defunding the police ❌
Jailing marijuana offenders ❌

This list goes on. She's a liar.


Looks like she is getting a dose of political reality, and now knows, being absolutely against fracking will not fly. Oil is big business and about our biggest export, and fracking is a large part of it's productivity. States need to decide on fracking and regulation of it, within their states, as it doesn't simple support their state, but can have huge effects on their state, such as pollution, and even earthquakes, but that has to be the decision of the elected officials within a given state.
 
Looks like she is getting a dose of political reality, and now knows, being absolutely against fracking will not fly. Oil is big business and about our biggest export, and fracking is a large part of it's productivity. States need to decide on fracking and regulation of it, within their states, as it doesn't simple support their state, but can have huge effects on their state, such as pollution, and even earthquakes, but that has to be the decision of the elected officials within a given state.
She stands for nothing except power and control.
 
She stands for nothing except power and control.
And Trump does not? Are you shitting me? You are just pissed as she is not running, based on being against fracking, which is a logical political stance. You are part of the same idiots that thought Biden and Harris were going to end fossil fuel, while instead, we became the largest producer on the planet, with that administration opening some of the largest expansions of project (even on public lands) in decades, far more than Trump ever did and with greater sustained output. You do not seem to grasp that industry or the historic profits and output they have achieved during the Biden/Harris administration. All this, and we got to keep the Arctic Wildlife Preserve, too. No matter what you think, (and you think too much, as you seem to understand too little), the Biden/Harris administration has been good for that industry, it's output and supporting record exports, so she will not kill the golden goose, no matter if you need her to, or not.
 
And Trump does not? Are you shitting me? You are just pissed as she is not running, based on being against fracking, which is a logical political stance. You are part of the same idiots that thought Biden and Harris were going to end fossil fuel, while instead, we became the largest producer on the planet, with that administration opening some of the largest expansions of project (even on public lands) in decades, far more than Trump ever did and with greater sustained output. You do not seem to grasp that industry or the historic profits and output they have achieved during the Biden/Harris administration. All this, and we got to keep the Arctic Wildlife Preserve, too. No matter what you think, (and you think too much, as you seem to understand too little), the Biden/Harris administration has been good for that industry, it's output and supporting record exports, so she will not kill the golden goose, no matter if you need her to, or not.
Trump doesn’t change his positions with the breeze. He’s running on the same issues he did 8 years ago.
 
Trump doesn’t change his positions with the breeze. He’s running on the same issues he did 8 years ago.
He has got a few more, now, like starting a trade war, with the intent of using tariffs paid by the Americans that buy good, paying enough more to do away with income taxes. He wants to gut civil service and keep the vast majority of Federal jobs for trumpers, loyal only to him. Democrats need not apply. He told Christians last week, if they pull him through this one, they won't have to worry about voting, ever again. So he can declare a national emergency and do away with national elections, and the bought and paid for Supreme Courts, says he cannot even be prosecuted, if he does.

So, count on it. He will lose and lose big, as people are not willing to give up our representative democracy for the likes of that piece of shit. Nothing person. He just isn't worth the damage to our country or the world, as he only supports strongman autocratic governments instead of traditional US allies and representative democracies.
 
It's hilarious watching the left screech SHE DIDN'T SAY WHAT SHE SAID.

Democrats are stupid enough to believe it. Normal people laugh at them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top