Obama and Clinton approved Uranium sales to Russia, that Russia then

Bassman007

Platinum Member
Sep 10, 2015
6,995
1,210
sold to Iran and North Korea............................Really

C6QaBBXWYAAF2A6.jpg
 
all throughout the campaign, Hillary acted as is she actually ate some of that uranium.
 
For the millionth time.

Not true. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't.

Instead of learning how your own government works, you believe every little idiot meme that comes along.

Hint: the US govt has THREE branches.

THREE.

Figure it out.

No wonder we've got a giant cheeto writing pretend Exec Orders while you RWNJs celebrate.
 
For the millionth time.

Not true. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't.

Instead of learning how your own government works, you believe every little idiot meme that comes along.

Hint: the US govt has THREE branches.

THREE.

Figure it out.

No wonder we've got a giant cheeto writing pretend Exec Orders while you RWNJs celebrate.
You are in denial

Is the NY Times really wrong?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
 
For the millionth time.

Not true. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't.

Instead of learning how your own government works, you believe every little idiot meme that comes along.

Hint: the US govt has THREE branches.

THREE.

Figure it out.

No wonder we've got a giant cheeto writing pretend Exec Orders while you RWNJs celebrate.
You are in denial

Is the NY Times really wrong?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0


Please don't try to hide your mistake by changing the subject.

That is NOT what you wrote in the OP. Nor is it what I commented on.

You said Obama and Clinton approved uranium sales to Russia. That is simply not true.
 
For the millionth time.

Not true. Even if they wanted to, they couldn't.

Instead of learning how your own government works, you believe every little idiot meme that comes along.

Hint: the US govt has THREE branches.

THREE.

Figure it out.

No wonder we've got a giant cheeto writing pretend Exec Orders while you RWNJs celebrate.
You are in denial

Is the NY Times really wrong?

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0


Please don't try to hide your mistake by changing the subject.

That is NOT what you wrote in the OP. Nor is it what I commented on.

You said Obama and Clinton approved uranium sales to Russia. That is simply not true.

So you are then claiming that the NY Times is wrong for writing that Clinton did sell Uranium to Russia?

Look idiot, you can not win because you have already lost, but are actually too dumb to know this.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Seriously how delusional are you? do you still believe that Hillary can not lose the election?
 
Now you've mish-mashed even more into your original post. You lack the critical thinking skills necessary to choose one but where I think you might be headed with this ---

Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.
Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. See Example(s)

EXAMPLES
Collected via e-mail, 2016

January 2016:

This was on Facebook: “As Secretary of State, Hilary transferred half of U.S. uranium to Russia and received $145 million donation to Clinton Foundation.”

March 2016:

This is posted on Facebook. “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton transferred 20% of US uranium to Putin’s Russia as 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.” Is this a true fact? Thanks.

RATING
det-red.gif
false
ORIGIN
In the months leading up to the 2016 United States presidential election, stories abounded about the relationships between the Clinton Foundation and various foreign entities.

====
Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia 20% of US uranium
====

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-give-russia-uranium-1792446097
====

No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium" in the US

====

There are millions more links but I know you have made up your "mind" and will not be swayed by facts.

LEARN HOW YOUR OWN GOVT WORKS.
 
Now you've mish-mashed even more into your original post. You lack the critical thinking skills necessary to choose one but where I think you might be headed with this ---

Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.
Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. See Example(s)

EXAMPLES
Collected via e-mail, 2016

January 2016:

This was on Facebook: “As Secretary of State, Hilary transferred half of U.S. uranium to Russia and received $145 million donation to Clinton Foundation.”

March 2016:

This is posted on Facebook. “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton transferred 20% of US uranium to Putin’s Russia as 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.” Is this a true fact? Thanks.

RATING
det-red.gif
false
ORIGIN
In the months leading up to the 2016 United States presidential election, stories abounded about the relationships between the Clinton Foundation and various foreign entities.

====
Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia 20% of US uranium
====
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-give-russia-uranium-1792446097

No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium" in the US

====

There are millions more but I know you have made up your "mind" and will not be swayed by facts.

LEARN HOW YOUR OWN GOVT WORKS.

It's not my information silly, you are arguing with the LIBERAL NY TIMES.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock

LOL Call the Times and complain shitforbrains
 

Forum List

Back
Top