Davros
Silver Member
- Jul 24, 2015
- 2,970
- 352
- 90
- Thread starter
- #41
I'm aware of that, however the writer of the OP is obviously in error in two instances, just as nearly everyone on the rabid right are when they parrot the bullshit from their echo chamber regarding EO's. They are, as a group, abjectly ignorant of EO's and oft follow the trite wing media in referring to the host of lawful Executive Actions, to which they are told to disagree, as Executive Orders, which are distinctly different animals! In essence, they're ignorant!Obama has not written an EO about guns yet. He is working on it.By illegal executive order.
Expanding the requirement of background checks to private dealers is illegal because it is not in the law passed by Congress. Obama is trying to illegally change the law through executive order.
I don't care your party or what your opinion on the gunshow loophole is ... this is wrong.
Obama's use of illegal executive order to circumvent the law should have been an impeachable offense, but Obama has gotten away with it. The shame.
Here is a link to the Executive Order Disposition Table in the National Archives. The page lists all of the EO's produced by the Obama Administration by year:
Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables
From those EO's enshrined in the National Archives credited to Obama, which one is that to which you are referring in your OP? Don't dance, deflect or dissemble, but respond to this post credibly. The assertion was YOURS!
Obama meets Bloomberg as he prepares order on guns - CNNPolitics.com
I suggest we all wait to see what it actually says when he issues it, and not make any assumptions.
![haha :haha: :haha:](/images/smilies/haha.gif)