IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #41
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Obama Had A Lower Average Approval Rating Than NIXON
- Thread starter easyt65
- Start date
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
- 1,940
- Banned
- #42
Barry is ranked 9th out of 12 and below Bush for average approval rating. That's how he ranks.Obama left office with a 60% approval rating, how does that compare to Bush?
That's average....
How did people rate their ENTIRE body of work upon departure?
Scrub didn't fare quite as well.....the difference is no longer within MOE........it's nearly 100%[/QUOTE]
The biggest reason why his ratings were shit, is he spent too much and he spent on stupid things like ill thought out foreign aid....
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
- 1,940
- Banned
- #43
Yes, bush spent like a drunken sailor in fact a fleet of them, only to be outdone by barry...Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #44
Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
- 1,940
- Banned
- #46
All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #47
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #48
Did you come up with that number, Dumbass?All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #49
Uh....no......but you, sure as shit, are a moron....Post #6 is alt-fact.....This is the sourceWe're not discussing your alt-facts however....,His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....
How does that compare to everyone?
Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?
There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......
Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?
Why not refer directly to Gallup?
Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
Oh.......THAT'S why!
See post #6 for alt-facts....
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
See the Gallup thing?
It's the same Gallup....
Which of its facts are "alt"?
O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....
Tell me, O......how did you get here?
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,175
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #50
I did show it to you. What - you want me to draw a picture for you?In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....
BTW, it's 'get the LEAD out', so to speak.
get the lead out
phrase of lead
- 1.
North Americaninformal
move or work more quickly.
synonyms: hurry up, get a move on, be quick;
NoNukes
Gold Member
What were their final approval ratings? that is what counts. If your team loses a game, but were ahead for most of it, you still lost. You guys are desperate. Alternative facts?For all the snowflakes and Bush-haters who don't want to read the article / poll, ya know who had a higher average approval rating than Barry did? That's Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight:
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuush!
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
gawd but easytroll65 is a rw FAILTroll extraordinairelol. Typical for easytroll65 to use a source like that. PoliticalcHick uses them all the time. Tells you a lotThat is a Brent Bozell poll eh ....CNS news LOL"Obama Doesn't Get The Gold, Silver Or Bronze For Avg Approval Rating"
Obama Had A Lower Average Approval Rating Than NIXON
"President Barack Obama had a lower average approval rating than a president who resigned and another who was impeached, according to Gallup.
Gallup published Jan. 20 that Obama’s average approval rating was 47.9 percent. When compared to post-World War II presidents, Obama ranks 9th out of 12"
I am impressed that Obama was ranked higher than even Harry Truman ...
What's even more choice is that it rebleats a CNS rebleat of Gallup.....
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
- 1,940
- Banned
- #53
Bush and Foreign AidDid you come up with that number, Dumbass?All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
owebo is just another rw poo slinger like OP. They are legion here.This is the sourceWe're not discussing your alt-facts however....,44 was a horrible POTUS....the facts clearly show that....
His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....
How does that compare to everyone?
Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?
There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......
Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?
Why not refer directly to Gallup?
Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
Oh.......THAT'S why!
See post #6 for alt-facts....
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
See the Gallup thing?
It's the same Gallup....
Which of its facts are "alt"?
O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #55
In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.I did show it to you. What - you want me to draw a picture for you?In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Show me your math, Eaze......be sure to cinch that duct tape snood real tight.......cause I'm gonna take Reality upside your empty head and "get the Led out", so to speak....
BTW, it's 'get the LEAD out', so to speak.
get the lead out
phrase of lead
- 1.
North Americaninformal
move or work more quickly.
synonyms: hurry up, get a move on, be quick;
09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75
09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding - Annual 2000 - 2015
Here, for example, you are only off by 100%...
Further, why are you letting Scrub off the hook for his spending requests of FY 2008 and FY2009? (Rhetorical.......you are doing so because you are a credulous imbecile)
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #56
A number, you fucking fraud.....Bush and Foreign AidDid you come up with that number, Dumbass?All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Really?!Bush not only spent like a drunken sailor... he spent like a fleet of drunken sailors. He was extraordinarily stupid on how much he spent on the foreign aid
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid
how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?
You're a fucking idiot.....why do you even bother?
Rustic
Diamond Member
- Oct 3, 2015
- 58,769
- 5,895
- 1,940
- Banned
- #57
100% of it was waste fraud and abuse... that a good enough number for you today?A number, you fucking fraud.....Bush and Foreign AidDid you come up with that number, Dumbass?All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Really?!
In 6 years - during 2 wars, 9/11/01, and the aftermath of 9/11/01 - he added $2.5 Trillion. In his last 2 years another $1.5 Trillion was added by the near Super Majority Democratic Party Controlled congress.
Starting out with that same control of Congress his 1st 2 years Obama went on to add nearly $7 trillion in only 4 years. Altogether, over 8 years, Obama oversaw almost DOUBLE the debt addition under Bush - more debt addition than EVERY US President COMBINED before him.
Snowflakes, however ,insist 'if it went bad it was Bush's fault', much like how Barry tried to blame the entire world for HIS ill-advised Syrian 'Red Line' F*-UP!
Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid
how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?
You're a fucking idiot.....why do you even bother?
Billions and billions of dollars wasted
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #58
Another Dumbass for Trump.....owebo is just another rw poo slinger like OP. They are legion here.This is the sourceWe're not discussing your alt-facts however....,His outgoing Gallup JARs were 59%.....
How does that compare to everyone?
Did CNS/TuckerCarlson not labor that?
There is no such thing as "alt-facts"......
Why would Tucker rebleat the CNS version of the Gallup release?
Why not refer directly to Gallup?
Despite subpar approval ratings for much of his presidency, Obama finished strong. His final job approval rating, based on Jan. 17-19 Gallup Daily tracking, was 59%. Only Clinton (66%) and Reagan (63%) had higher scores in Gallup's last measurement of their approval ratings, while Eisenhower (59%) and Kennedy (58%) had similar final ratings.
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
Oh.......THAT'S why!
See post #6 for alt-facts....
Obama Averages 47.9% Job Approval as President
See the Gallup thing?
It's the same Gallup....
Which of its facts are "alt"?
O........there is much Stupid round here, yet you stand out among your fellow sheeple......there's quite a bit of Bripat about you, lad.....
IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,142
- 2,255
- Banned
- #59
Rustic,100% of it was waste fraud and abuse... that a good enough number for you today?A number, you fucking fraud.....Bush and Foreign AidDid you come up with that number, Dumbass?All career politicians can't help but to spend more than what they have… Of other peoples money.Seriously.......you're a fucking idiot...
Do you know what a "Structural Deficit" is?
In his autobiography, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Penguin Press), Greenspan, 81, makes clear that his patron Ronald Reagan, who appointed him to head the U.S. central bank board in 1987, was a reckless steward of the nation's finances, eclipsed in economic irresponsibility by current president George W. Bush.
Clinton was in a fiscal bind when he came to power in 1993, and the record deficits of Reagan and George H.W. Bush put him there. "The hard truth was that Reagan had borrowed from Clinton, and Clinton was having to pay it back," Greenspan writes. "I was impressed that he did not seem to be trying to fudge reality to the extent politicians ordinarily do. He was forcing himself to live in the real world."
Greenspan is Clinton's unlikely defender | Toronto Star
It's a socialist thing
Waste fraud and abuse… bush's foreign aid
how does a citation from 2003 tell us what Scrub spent in that category between 2001 and 2009?
You're a fucking idiot.....why do you even bother?
Billions and billions of dollars wasted
Give it up......you're an idiot......
TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #60
then we have the Right Orange Poltroon in charge there good buddy… Of other peoples money.
It's a socialist thing
Trump: 'There's nothing like doing things with other people's money ..
How Trump Rides on Waves of Other People's Money - Bloomberg
How Donald Trump Used Other People's Money to Avoid Paying
Similar threads
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 206
- Replies
- 53
- Views
- 660
- Replies
- 38
- Views
- 482
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 142
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 66
- Replies
- 112
- Views
- 649
- Replies
- 67
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 47
- Views
- 227
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8658
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 485
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-