Obama has an epiphany. Finally admits we are at war.

The greatest enemy America faces is the Republican Party, not AQ.

The Republicans have done more damage to America, than AQ ever will.

Another opinion from a pontificating doofus who has narry a clue about anything other than when his next welfare check will arrive so he can buy some Ripple.
 
The greatest enemy America faces is the Republican Party, not AQ.

The Republicans have done more damage to America, than AQ ever will.

Another opinion from a pontificating doofus who has narry a clue about anything other than when his next welfare check will arrive so he can buy some Ripple.

That shit always cracks me up.

I work seven days a week, make very good money, and I have never gotten a government check except for that thing George Bush sent out.

And I don't drink, smoke, or use drugs.

But thanks for trying.
 
The greatest enemy America faces is the Republican Party, not AQ.

The Republicans have done more damage to America, than AQ ever will.

:cuckoo:

You simplistic, bombastic and dishonest liberoidals (particularly those who belong to the Democrat Parody) are actually a bigger threat than any Republican has ever been.

It takes a special brand of moron (like you) to claim that an American political Party represents more of a menace to America than the idiots who have been trying to kill our people.

You libtards are a very odd degenerate lot.

45,000 Americans die every year because they don't have health insurance.

1,000,000 Americans have been killed by guns since 1960.

George Bush killed 4,000 American soldiers by invading Iraq, and wasted $700 billion dollars.

Phil Gramm destroyed the American economy by deregulating financial institutions which created a $516 TRILLION DOLLAR derivative bomb.

The Republican Party has done more damage to America than a few hundred guys in Pakistan with no army, no navy, and no air force could ever hope to accomplish.

Mission Accomplished.
 
Hey, psst. sboyle.

Did you know that we are at war?

The child-king President finally figured it out.

You should, too!

Pass it on.

I guess if you consider a localized Jihad us being at war then sure. Not all of us respect the Jihad enough to consider it a war though.

The Conservative word bank seems to be limited to three power words; War, Terrorism/terrorist, and No.

Why is it not even marginally surprising that a liberoidal troll tool, like you, has nothing of interest to say?

Yes. The 9/11/2001 attacks were merely a "localized Jihad." [That's not even a nicely turned phrase. It's the emptiest & dumbest attempt at poltiical rhetoric to show up here in quite a while, however. That IS saying something, too. :cuckoo: ]

:cuckoo:

If you pretend hard enough, you can probably get yourself to believe your own dishonest crapaganda. But, nobody else will be buyin' the shit you're peddlin'.

Let's outline what you said and try to find anything worthwhile within it.
-Attack
-Sarcastic statement
-Personal attack

I believe you are familiar with the term vapid?
 
The greatest enemy America faces is the Republican Party, not AQ.

The Republicans have done more damage to America, than AQ ever will.

Another opinion from a pontificating doofus who has narry a clue about anything other than when his next welfare check will arrive so he can buy some Ripple.

That shit always cracks me up.

I work seven days a week, make very good money, and I have never gotten a government check except for that thing George Bush sent out.

And I don't drink, smoke, or use drugs.

But thanks for trying.

could have fooled us psycho...
 
I guess if you consider a localized Jihad us being at war then sure. Not all of us respect the Jihad enough to consider it a war though.

The Conservative word bank seems to be limited to three power words; War, Terrorism/terrorist, and No.

Why is it not even marginally surprising that a liberoidal troll tool, like you, has nothing of interest to say?

Yes. The 9/11/2001 attacks were merely a "localized Jihad." [That's not even a nicely turned phrase. It's the emptiest & dumbest attempt at poltiical rhetoric to show up here in quite a while, however. That IS saying something, too. :cuckoo: ]

:cuckoo:

If you pretend hard enough, you can probably get yourself to believe your own dishonest crapaganda. But, nobody else will be buyin' the shit you're peddlin'.

Let's outline what you said and try to find anything worthwhile within it.
-Attack
-Sarcastic statement
-Personal attack

I believe you are familiar with the term vapid?

Responding to your infantile and unpersusavie rhetoric like that amazingly insipid shit "localized Jihad." You don't like the response, poor widdle boo boo?

Too fucking bad.

Don't spew your liberoidal brand stupidity with such reckless abandon, then.

Sarcasm is all you warrant when you say stupid shit like you have been spewing. Don't like it? Tough. Grow up and toughen up, fucktard.

Personal attack? Yes. You deserved it and, of course, despite your imbecile protests, you also engage in it. :cuckoo:

So, feel obligated to go fuck yourself!

Have a great night, kid. Ta ta! :lol:
 
Last edited:
Responding to your infantile and unpersusavie rhetoric like that amazingly insipid shit "localaized Jihad." You don't like the response, poor widdle boo boo?

Too fucking bad.

Don't spew your liberoidal brand stupidity with such reckless abandon, then.

Sarcasm is all you warrant when you say stupid shit like you have been spewing. Don't like it? Tough. Grow up and toughen up, fucktard.

Personal attack? Yes. You deserved it and, of course, despite your imbecile protests, you also engage in it. :cuckoo:

So, feel obligated to go fuck yourself!

Have a great night, kid. Ta ta! :lol:


How unfortunate you feel that way.
 
Responding to your infantile and unpersusavie rhetoric like that amazingly insipid shit "localaized Jihad." You don't like the response, poor widdle boo boo?

Too fucking bad.

Don't spew your liberoidal brand stupidity with such reckless abandon, then.

Sarcasm is all you warrant when you say stupid shit like you have been spewing. Don't like it? Tough. Grow up and toughen up, fucktard.

Personal attack? Yes. You deserved it and, of course, despite your imbecile protests, you also engage in it. :cuckoo:

So, feel obligated to go fuck yourself!

Have a great night, kid. Ta ta! :lol:


How unfortunate you feel that way.

As unfortunate as the fact that your posts have warranted that I feel that way.
 
Last edited:
responding to your infantile and unpersusavie rhetoric like that amazingly insipid shit "localaized jihad." you don't like the response, poor widdle boo boo?

Too fucking bad.

Don't spew your liberoidal brand stupidity with such reckless abandon, then.

Sarcasm is all you warrant when you say stupid shit like you have been spewing. Don't like it? Tough. Grow up and toughen up, fucktard.

Personal attack? Yes. You deserved it and, of course, despite your imbecile protests, you also engage in it. :cuckoo:

So, feel obligated to go fuck yourself!

Have a great night, kid. Ta ta! :lol:


how unfortunate you feel that way.

as unfortunate as the fact that your posts have warranted that i feel that way.

k
 
The greatest enemy America faces is the Republican Party, not AQ.

The Republicans have done more damage to America, than AQ ever will.

You are an idiot.

Thank you for your attention on this matter.
 
Hey, psst. sboyle.

Did you know that we are at war?

The child-king President finally figured it out.

You should, too!

Pass it on.

I guess if you consider a localized Jihad us being at war then sure. Not all of us respect the Jihad enough to consider it a war though.

The Conservative word bank seems to be limited to three power words; War, Terrorism/terrorist, and No.


It's hard to fathom the stupidity of the above statement.

The US had the worst attack on it in its history by this "localized jihad group".

They damaged the Pentagon, brought down the WTC, tried and failed to get the White House, and killed 3,000 civilians.

Christmas Day the localized jihad group almost blew up a plane over Detroit, and only failed due to a mechanical problem.

:cuckoo:
 
Hey, psst. sboyle.

Did you know that we are at war?

The child-king President finally figured it out.

You should, too!

Pass it on.

I guess if you consider a localized Jihad us being at war then sure. Not all of us respect the Jihad enough to consider it a war though.

The Conservative word bank seems to be limited to three power words; War, Terrorism/terrorist, and No.


It's hard to fathom the stupidity of the above statement.

The US had the worst attack on it in its history by this "localized jihad group".

They damaged the Pentagon, brought down the WTC, tried and failed to get the White House, and killed 3,000 civilians.

Christmas Day the localized jihad group almost blew up a plane over Detroit, and only failed due to a mechanical problem.

:cuckoo:

Localized jihad movement...WTF sboyle? Another stupid comment...I suppose they were hanging out on the corner of 47th and 6th Ave eating falafels and hatched the plan on September 10th 2001,,,right? After all...they were locals.
 
The jihad movement is localized and centered in the middle east, and the attack on twin towers was an extension of that jihad. Sorry for not clarifying to all of you confused by the statement. The jihad is localized because muslims in America, Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, China, Australia, Russia, and Europe are not participating in this jihad. The jihad is centralized in the Middle east, and thus localized. If you wish to continue to blow the statement out of proportion go ahead.
 
The jihad movement is localized and centered in the middle east, and the attack on twin towers was an extension of that jihad. Sorry for not clarifying to all of you confused by the statement. The jihad is localized because muslims in America, Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, China, Australia, Russia, and Europe are not participating in this jihad. The jihad is centralized in the Middle east, and thus localized. If you wish to continue to blow the statement out of proportion go ahead.

I think there are probably more centers of jihadism than just in the Middle East though that certainly is a focal point in the war on terrorism. Defeat jihadism there or render it mostly toothless, and we will have accomplished a great goal.

I received this e-mail recently and thought it interesting, but have no way of knowing whether it is authentic or accurate. I am trying to get hold of a copy of Hammond's book that it references:

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:


Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
 
The jihad movement is localized and centered in the middle east, and the attack on twin towers was an extension of that jihad. Sorry for not clarifying to all of you confused by the statement. The jihad is localized because muslims in America, Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, China, Australia, Russia, and Europe are not participating in this jihad. The jihad is centralized in the Middle east, and thus localized. If you wish to continue to blow the statement out of proportion go ahead.

I respect Al Qaida attacks enough to call it a war.

You are utterly clueless :cuckoo:
 
The jihad movement is localized and centered in the middle east, and the attack on twin towers was an extension of that jihad. Sorry for not clarifying to all of you confused by the statement. The jihad is localized because muslims in America, Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, China, Australia, Russia, and Europe are not participating in this jihad. The jihad is centralized in the Middle east, and thus localized. If you wish to continue to blow the statement out of proportion go ahead.

The jihad movement is localized AND centered in the M.E.

And the attack HERE was an "extension."

Oh.

:cuckoo:

So then it wasn't "localized." When you put it THAT way, it sounds rather global.

Sorry that you think speaking in your special brand of retard is somehow in the slightest little bit persuasive.

It isn't.
 
Last edited:
The jihad movement is localized and centered in the middle east, and the attack on twin towers was an extension of that jihad. Sorry for not clarifying to all of you confused by the statement. The jihad is localized because muslims in America, Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, China, Australia, Russia, and Europe are not participating in this jihad. The jihad is centralized in the Middle east, and thus localized. If you wish to continue to blow the statement out of proportion go ahead.

I think there are probably more centers of jihadism than just in the Middle East though that certainly is a focal point in the war on terrorism. Defeat jihadism there or render it mostly toothless, and we will have accomplished a great goal.

I received this e-mail recently and thought it interesting, but have no way of knowing whether it is authentic or accurate. I am trying to get hold of a copy of Hammond's book that it references:

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:


Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

If it is true it is a rather interesting statistic. I suppose there are many centers for jihadism as you say but yeah the central one against the United States is ME based.

"I think there are probably more centers of jihadism than just in the Middle East though that certainly is a focal point in the war on terrorism. Defeat jihadism there or render it mostly toothless, and we will have accomplished a great goal."

That was the kind of analytic and higher thinking being response I was hoping for, thank you. All I've gotten is a bunch of :cuckoo: crap lol.
 

Forum List

Back
Top