Obama Rally Draws 100,000 in Missouri

Missouri is going to be a nail biter, if the Jim Talent/Claire McCaskill senate race from 2006 is any indication. When I went to bed at 2 am Talent was slightly ahead. By 8 am McCaskill was our Senator.
 
Missouri is going to be a nail biter, if the Jim Talent/Claire McCaskill senate race from 2006 is any indication. When I went to bed at 2 am Talent was slightly ahead. By 8 am McCaskill was our Senator.

So there is hope eh!
 
Huh? Bush is conservative, as Clinton was. Not happening. No conservative would attempt to wage two wars, expand foreign aid, and increase domestic spending.

so you're saying he lied when he ran as a "compassionate conservative"?

Please define conservative for me cuz I think I'm confused. :confused:
 
Bush isnt and never has been a conservative
you believe so because you are a moron

Its called a Neocon, which is part of the conservative movement.

You can't pretend your ugly ducklings don't exist by saying "hes not one of us anymore!".
 
so you're saying he lied when he ran as a "compassionate conservative"?

Please define conservative for me cuz I think I'm confused. :confused:

Other than the war, what part do you disagree with? :confused: He spent more on AIDS and aid to Africa than every before. He has given more aid to South America. He's for open borders. The thinking behind NCLB was all about the lowest socioeconomic groups, in fact the parameters have hurt both property values and school rankings in wealthier areas.
 
Other than the war, what part do you disagree with? :confused: He spent more on AIDS and aid to Africa than every before. He has given more aid to South America. He's for open borders. The thinking behind NCLB was all about the lowest socioeconomic groups, in fact the parameters have hurt both property values and school rankings in wealthier areas.

so you're saying the Bush is a liberal hiding in the Republican party and ya'll helped elect him twice? smart move :clap2:

will there be a revisionist history in years to come claiming that Bush was a Democrat? :lol:

I still need your definition of a conservative though. Especially since I've been told I am one and I strongly doubt it
 
Last edited:
so you're saying the Bush is a liberal hiding in the Republican party and ya'll helped elect him twice? smart move :clap2:

will there be a revisionist history in years to come claiming that Bush was a Democrat? :lol:

I still need your definition of a conservative though. Especially since I've been told I am one and I strongly doubt it

I don't really care about the labels. I've voted for Jimmy Carter and once for Clinton. I've voted for both Democrats and Republicans and even a Libertarian locally.

I think Bush has been a liberal in most facets of the spectrum. He is a war hawk, though without 9/11, it wouldn't have been the case. Those who hate him now, would still hate him. I'm unsure if it's because of the lemming effect from 2000 elections or just the (R).

I think McCain is a step better or worse than Bush, but both are more 'conservative' than what Obama has in mind. If the 'dream' is realized, I doubt those not committed to socialism are going to be happy. I might be wrong, but my guess is even the majority of Democrats don't realize what they are buying.
 
Where is the real Paperboy and what have you done with his body?

I don't mind giving the man his due. I've posted positive things about Obama before. I just don't agree with many of his policies and I think he has been less then forthcoming in many ways. But no one can say he hasn't inspired many people but then again so did... oh, never mind. :D
 
If the 'dream' is realized, I doubt those not committed to socialism are going to be happy. I might be wrong, but my guess is even the majority of Democrats don't realize what they are buying.

Then the congress will have enough votes to block it (all repubs plus some substantial number of dems).

None of it will be irreversible in any event. I thought all of Bush's stuff was the end of the world, and can say I WAS WRONG and we survived and a lot of the worst fears (1) never happened and (2) if they did can be reversed.

Same is true for an obama administration, for anyone who is honestly afraid of some bogeyman named socialism, which I doubt would happen as Obama uses Clintons economic policies (and advisors) as a template.
 
Then the congress will have enough votes to block it (all repubs plus some substantial number of dems).

None of it will be irreversible in any event. I thought all of Bush's stuff was the end of the world, and can say I WAS WRONG and we survived and a lot of the worst fears (1) never happened and (2) if they did can be reversed.

Same is true for an obama administration, for anyone who is honestly afraid of some bogeyman named socialism, which I doubt would happen as Obama uses Clintons economic policies (and advisors) as a template.

It will be over before we know it, right or left, if Pelosi and pollers are correct. Bend over and take it, get off if you can. Probably the best you'll feel in many years.
 
Then the congress will have enough votes to block it (all repubs plus some substantial number of dems).

None of it will be irreversible in any event. I thought all of Bush's stuff was the end of the world, and can say I WAS WRONG and we survived and a lot of the worst fears (1) never happened and (2) if they did can be reversed.

Same is true for an obama administration, for anyone who is honestly afraid of some bogeyman named socialism, which I doubt would happen as Obama uses Clintons economic policies (and advisors) as a template.
which is what i have known for some time, i dont fear an Obama administration any more than i feared the Carter administration
and with Obama, it will be Carter 2.0
we will survive it, and more than likely, will come out the better for it
i'd rather not have to, but if McCain doesnt win it is not the end of the world
 
which is what i have known for some time, i dont fear an Obama administration any more than i feared the Carter administration
and with Obama, it will be Carter 2.0
we will survive it, and more than likely, will come out the better for it
i'd rather not have to, but if McCain doesnt win it is not the end of the world

Certainly not the end of the world or the US, but I think you are being optimistic regarding the outcome. There is no doubt in my mind that if things go the way they look, substantive change is coming.
 
Certainly not the end of the world or the US, but I think you are being optimistic regarding the outcome. There is no doubt in my mind that if things go the way they look, substantive change is coming.
if you look in the data of most of these polls(the ones that actually let you) you will see they are all over sampoling democrats
of course most of the libs will claim they are adjusting for that, but you can not fix faultly data to not be faulty
 
if you look in the data of most of these polls(the ones that actually let you) you will see they are all over sampoling democrats
of course most of the libs will claim they are adjusting for that, but you can not fix faultly data to not be faulty

If look at most of your posts, they don't contain capitalization or punctuation.
 
if you look in the data of most of these polls(the ones that actually let you) you will see they are all over sampoling democrats
of course most of the libs will claim they are adjusting for that, but you can not fix faultly data to not be faulty

I don't really care about polls, Nov 4 will do it. On the other hand, inevitable does become likely.
 

Forum List

Back
Top