🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama stimulus is failed

Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.

Well in 1920 Coolidge and SecTres Mellon had 12% unemployment, they cut taxes and government spending and in 18 months unemployment was 4%. A year later you could not find an unemployed person in the USA.

I wonder how deleveraging after a war differs from the aftermath of a financial crisis.

Also, if cutting taxes is such a magic bullet, why didn't the economy boom over the last decade?

It makes it harder as vets are returned to the job market and dislocations of goods and services are rationalized back into the peacetime economy.

The economy did boom, relatively speaking, in the aftermath of the BUsh tax cuts. A lot of bad policy on both sides of the aisle prevented it from doing really well.
 
And to compare how much better of we could have been by now if we had proper economic policies:

In terms of jobs, the Reagan recovery of 1982-1984 stands in sharp contrast to the Obama recovery of 2009-2011. The recession that started in July 1981 lasted almost as long as the downturn that began in December 2007 (16 months vs. 18 months), and produced higher peak unemployment (10.8% vs. 10.1%). However, during the first two years of the Reagan recovery, total employment increased by 7.2 million. The unemployment rate fell from 10.8% to 7.2%, even though labor force participation increased from 64.2% to 64.5%.

President Obama Authors The Economic Recovery That Isn’t - Louis Woodhill - Unconventional Logic - Forbes
 
Actually the stimulus worked great.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

If trillion dollar deficits, 9% unemployment, and GDP growth of under 2% is working Id hate to see your definition of failure.

Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.


OFGFS...:lol:

we know where they aren't...

unemployment-romerchart-0710.jpg
 
Last edited:
Actually the stimulus worked great.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

If trillion dollar deficits, 9% unemployment, and GDP growth of under 2% is working Id hate to see your definition of failure.

Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.


Here you go: without the Stimulus Plan, Obama said unemployment would be @ 8%.

boedicca-albums-mo-more-boedicca-s-stuff-picture3612-updated-unemployment-stimulus-graph.png



That sounds much better than the current 9.1%.
 
The 2009 GDP was $14.119 tril. The Deficit was $1.4 tril. Take that away then 2009 GDP would have been a Depression Level, 20% less at $12.16 tril. The following year, with the the $.1.3 tril. federal deficit of that year, then A Greatest Depression Ever would have been a GDP of $10.34 tril. It would have been cratering, of course, a lot faster than that!

At Last, the U.S. Begins a Serious Fiscal Debate

The Greatest Depression Ever is what the Party of Boehner/Cantor/McConnell/Romney/Santorum/Huntsman/Roemer/Cain/Palin/Bachman/Paul-Paul, et. al.--and Pinochio--are all really for, even now.

It's on their permanent records!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Abraham Lincoln already famous for taking human life and prosperity away--and bailing out bankers, instead. Now Many want the current GDP at $10.0 tril, taking $4.0 tril. away!)
 
If trillion dollar deficits, 9% unemployment, and GDP growth of under 2% is working Id hate to see your definition of failure.

Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.


OFGFS...:lol:

we know where they aren't...

unemployment-romerchart-0710.jpg



Oh, I see. The New Plan is to get unemployment down to 8% in time for the election. The problem with the original projections was that they were inverted! Instead of unemployment peaking at 8%, the minimum dip should have been down to 8%.

Well...if 4M more people drop out of the labor force, they just might be able to pull it off.
 
Last edited:
The 2009 GDP was $14.119 tril. The Deficit was $1.4 tril. Take that away then 2009 GDP would have been a Depression Level, 20% less at $12.16 tril. The following year, with the the $.1.3 tril. federal deficit of that year, then A Greatest Depression Ever would have been a GDP of $10.34 tril. It would have been cratering, of course, a lot faster than that!

At Last, the U.S. Begins a Serious Fiscal Debate

The Greatest Depression Ever is what the Party of Boehner/Cantor/McConnell/Romney/Santorum/Huntsman/Roemer/Cain/Palin/Bachman/Paul-Paul, et. al.--and Pinochio--are all really for, even now.

It's on their permanent records!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Abraham Lincoln already famous for taking human life and prosperity away--and bailing out bankers, instead. Now Many want the current GDP at $10.0 tril, taking $4.0 tril. away!)




What a stupid analysis. You are assuming that the rest of the equation would have stayed static if government hadn't gobbled up such a big chunk of the economy.
 
The Cratering effect That all Republicans now want done to all of USA is not, in fact, completely factored in.

People with increase of nothing create an accelerated, increase of nothing.

It would clearly and actually be far worse, instead of the Labor Market turnaround of increase of 1.0 mil. jobs per month: Thanks only to the Democrats. The Republicans Almost entirely said, "No!" and even to the auto industry.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Half-Wit Father in Washington: Not send rotted corn and poison blankets, even to Detroit!)
 
If trillion dollar deficits, 9% unemployment, and GDP growth of under 2% is working Id hate to see your definition of failure.

Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.

Unemployment would have been about 9% at the height of the recession. Today it would be about 7%. GDP growth would be about 4%.
This is based on past recoveries. The evidence is pretty strong. The '86 recession was about this severe and those are the numbers we got then.

What evidence? All you did was make up numbers.
 
Well in 1920 Coolidge and SecTres Mellon had 12% unemployment, they cut taxes and government spending and in 18 months unemployment was 4%. A year later you could not find an unemployed person in the USA.

I wonder how deleveraging after a war differs from the aftermath of a financial crisis.

Also, if cutting taxes is such a magic bullet, why didn't the economy boom over the last decade?

It makes it harder as vets are returned to the job market and dislocations of goods and services are rationalized back into the peacetime economy.

I know. It was a rhetorical question, illustrating that the two scenarios are not comparable.


[quote
The economy did boom, relatively speaking, in the aftermath of the BUsh tax cuts. A lot of bad policy on both sides of the aisle prevented it from doing really well.[/QUOTE]

If the aughts were a boom time, I'd hate to see your definition of bust.
 
Actually the stimulus worked quite well.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

And it saved our auto industry, our banking system, and our real estate industry.
 
Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.


OFGFS...:lol:

we know where they aren't...

unemployment-romerchart-0710.jpg



Oh, I see. The New Plan is to get unemployment down to 8% in time for the election. The problem with the original projections was that they were inverted! Instead of unemployment peaking at 8%, the minimum dip should have been down to 8%.

Well...if 4M more people drop out of the labor force, they just might be able to pull it off.

No, the problem with the original projections is that they were based on estimates of GDP loss in Q4 2008. Actual loss turned out to be much higher than the projections.
 
Once again job numbers are out. The results are dismal. We now have 9.1% unemployment, not counting those who have given up. Economists expected job creation to be 160k. We got just 54k. Manufacturing lost jobs for the first time in 7 months.
This isn't a recovery. IN a recovery jobs are stable, overtime increases, temporary work increases and then permanent employment increases. We are seeing continued job losses.
So the promise of Obama's stimulus to add however many jobs to the economy is a lie. It is a total failure.
In a British style parliamentary system they would stage a no-confidence vote in Obama. They would win.

You never understood the point.
 
Actually the stimulus worked quite well.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

And it saved our auto industry, our banking system, and our real estate industry.

I thought you were against corporate welfare? Or is it just when a black man does it?
 
Tell us where unemployment and GDP would been at the end of 2009, at the end of 2010, and today, if there had not been a stimulus bill.

Be specific, and tell us exactly how you know your numbers are correct.

Unemployment would have been about 9% at the height of the recession. Today it would be about 7%. GDP growth would be about 4%.
This is based on past recoveries. The evidence is pretty strong. The '86 recession was about this severe and those are the numbers we got then.

What evidence? All you did was make up numbers.

I gave the evidence. It is historical fact. We should be seeing much better numbers than we've seen. Especially given the unprecedented intervention by the gov't in the economy.

Unless, of course that intervention is actually the problem...hmm.....
 
Unemployment would have been about 9% at the height of the recession. Today it would be about 7%. GDP growth would be about 4%.
This is based on past recoveries. The evidence is pretty strong. The '86 recession was about this severe and those are the numbers we got then.

What evidence? All you did was make up numbers.

I gave the evidence. It is historical fact. We should be seeing much better numbers than we've seen. Especially given the unprecedented intervention by the gov't in the economy.

Unless, of course that intervention is actually the problem...hmm.....

Right the first time...
 
Actually the stimulus worked quite well.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

And it saved our auto industry, our banking system, and our real estate industry.

I thought you were against corporate welfare? Or is it just when a black man does it?

When an economy is going into a deflationary spiral, the government has to be the demand of last resort.

Bush, Obama, and Congress all understood that and to their credit prevented another Great Depression.
 
Actually the stimulus worked quite well.

It saved us from another Great Depression.

And it saved our auto industry, our banking system, and our real estate industry.

I thought you were against corporate welfare? Or is it just when a black man does it?

When an economy is going into a deflationary spiral, the government has to be the demand of last resort.

Bush, Obama, and Congress all understood that and to their credit prevented another Great Depression.

This idiotic theory was debunked 70 years ago with the Great Depression. Gov't turned a severe recession into a Great Depression by its actions. It looks like we are headed the same direction today.
 
I thought you were against corporate welfare? Or is it just when a black man does it?

When an economy is going into a deflationary spiral, the government has to be the demand of last resort.

Bush, Obama, and Congress all understood that and to their credit prevented another Great Depression.

This idiotic theory was debunked 70 years ago with the Great Depression. Gov't turned a severe recession into a Great Depression by its actions. It looks like we are headed the same direction today.

Wrong.

Corporate fear and greed created the Great Depression.

"We have nothing to fear except fear itself."

And we have had 15 straight months of job growth, plus the economy is growing.
 
Last edited:
When an economy is going into a deflationary spiral, the government has to be the demand of last resort.

Bush, Obama, and Congress all understood that and to their credit prevented another Great Depression.

This idiotic theory was debunked 70 years ago with the Great Depression. Gov't turned a severe recession into a Great Depression by its actions. It looks like we are headed the same direction today.

Wrong.

Corporate fear and greed created the Great Depression.

"We have nothing to fear except fear itself."

And we have had 15 straight months of job growth, plus the economy is growing.

Gov't policy created the Great Depression.
We have record high unemployment that appears to be growing and a slowing economy, from a not very brisk expansion to begin with.
The stimulus is a gross failure by the very standards of those who proposed it. Its authors have scurried away to safer environs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top