Obama's Approval Rating...Sad news for right wingers

It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president

Obama will NEVER be forgiven by them for being a Kenyan, Muslim, communist who kept on beating them.......Such seemed so.......so......so, [oh, what is the word].....so, Un-American.
No, it's none of that.

They'll never forgive him for being a democrat who 'took' the WH from republicans in 2008 and 'kept it from them' in 2012 – this is nothing more than petty partisan politics.
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.
Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?
How do you arrive at that? I remember the Reagan years very well. Were you in diapers?

St Redink Reagan left office more than a quarter century ago.

If that is all you have then you just proved my point.
It isn't all I have, I disputed your point. You don't follow too well.
 
They're obsessed with saving the country and putting an actual president in the WH.

Again, you're "correct".....Want to buy one of these T-shirts?

85
Want to buy some used toilet paper?
 
The question is this:

IF YOU WERE ADVISING HILLARY CLINTON, WOULD YOU SUGGEST FOR HER TO INDEED RUN AS AN "OBAMA 3rd TERM".....OR ON HER OWN PROGRESSIVE AGENDA?

History has shown that the best political strategy for electing another person of the same party after eights years of a member of that party being President is to campaign on continuity, not a change in direction.

So expect Clinton to pump up the volume on ObamaCare, immigration reform, and taxing the rich more.

Good luck with running Shrillary for pres lmao :laugh:
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.
Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?
How do you arrive at that? I remember the Reagan years very well. Were you in diapers?

St Redink Reagan left office more than a quarter century ago.

If that is all you have then you just proved my point.
It isn't all I have, I disputed your point. You don't follow too well.

Yes, you "disputed" my point by proving that it was accurate!

:rofl:
 
Yes, you "disputed" my point by proving that it was accurate!

:rofl:
How so? I picked the best example I know of, not the solitary one. Accuracy doesn't exist in your little bubble world.

Your one and only example was more than a quarter of a century ago. Since then the GOP track record on both the economy and governing has been worse than abysmal. You don't even have a candidate of St Redink Reagan's stature to run in 2016 either.

Now prove that Bush sr's massive tax hike and lousy economy was something to brag about. Or Bush jr's miserable job growth record and collapsed economy was something to be proud of.

Oh wait, you can't!

Nevermind!
 

Forum List

Back
Top