Obama's Approval Rating...Sad news for right wingers

There has to be some sane qualified female GOP candidates out there somewhere. One wonders why none of them are stepping up to the plate and making a name for themselves. This could be a golden opportunity for them.

The smarter ones probably know that the majority of the males in her party and in power have a bad case of misogyny.
 
2014 must have been a real bitch for you, feel free to get a retroactive self abortion when Ted Cruz is elected in 2016. The best thing a parasite like you will ever become is fertilizer.


Now, now blueballs.......I thought it was the so-called libs who stole elections with aliens and dead people......So, how did YOU guys win?? Don't tell me you too cheated? LOL
 
Last edited:
Interesting. So females are voting for a vagina much like blacks voted skin color. You guys are deep thinkers.


Not quite there, snowball.....If such were the case, we'd have a WH full of Palins and Carsons or that [999] guy who sold pizzas.....
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president

Obama will NEVER be forgiven by them for being a Kenyan, Muslim, communist who kept on beating them.......Such seemed so.......so......so, [oh, what is the word].....so, Un-American.
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.

Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?
 
LOL One of your fellow left loons started this thread and obsessing


Actually, no, dingbat....If you didn't have ADD, you would have noticed that there was a question at the end of the O/P.... THAT was the intent and objective of the post.
 
LOL One of your fellow left loons started this thread and obsessing


Actually, no, dingbat....If you didn't have ADD, you would have noticed that there was a question at the end of the O/P.... THAT was the intent and objective of the post.

You started the obsessing. Again with the childish and overused "dingbat"? Get some new material, macrame instructor
 
Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?

They're still obsessed with making Obama a one-termer....maybe they haven't noticed that.......oh well.
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.
Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?
How do you arrive at that? I remember the Reagan years very well. Were you in diapers?
 
Obama's approval rating...40 seat GOP majority in the House, GOP Senate majority, 31 GOP Governors man what a bitch slapping the GOP put on the hapless Democrats.
 
It's a ridiculous manifestation of ODS for conservatives to obsess over the president's approval ratings, or what they perceive to be his legacy.

The GOP and its presidential candidates need to focus on the republican message and what they want to accomplish, not engage in pointlessly attacking Obama.

Of course, republicans have little or nothing new to offer, hence the pointless, inane attacks on the president.
Then again the Republicans can't exactly run on their track record of stellar governing and successful economies so what option do they have?
How do you arrive at that? I remember the Reagan years very well. Were you in diapers?

St Redink Reagan left office more than a quarter century ago.

If that is all you have then you just proved my point.
 
The question is this:

IF YOU WERE ADVISING HILLARY CLINTON, WOULD YOU SUGGEST FOR HER TO INDEED RUN AS AN "OBAMA 3rd TERM".....OR ON HER OWN PROGRESSIVE AGENDA?

History has shown that the best political strategy for electing another person of the same party after eights years of a member of that party being President is to campaign on continuity, not a change in direction.

So expect Clinton to pump up the volume on ObamaCare, immigration reform, and taxing the rich more.
 
They're obsessed with saving the country and putting an actual president in the WH.

Again, you're "correct".....Want to buy one of these T-shirts?

85
 
History has shown that the best political strategy for electing another Democrat after eights years of a Democrat is to campaign on continuity, not a change in direction.

So expect Clinton to pump up the volume on ObamaCare, immigration reform, and taxing the rich more.

Well, thank goodness.....yet another apropos response. Thank you and I agree.
 

Forum List

Back
Top