Obama's post-Paris attack message...he is committed to supporting, freeing, and re-homing terrorists

koshergrl

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2011
81,129
14,025
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris
 
He's actually only going to accept those with beheading experience.
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
Yep. Too bad one wasn't done on obuthole, we would be far better off.
You white boys didnt do your job did you? I bet that burns your ass everytime you realize your taxes will got to support the POTUS in retirement?
I bet it burns your black ass every time you look in the mirror and find obuthole looks as retarded as you?
Since I dont look retarded then he must be as handsome as I am. However that has nothing to do with your frustration that a Black man is in the white house now does it?
laugh.gif
 
"Obama's post-Paris attack message...he is committed to supporting, freeing, and re-homing terrorists"

The thread premise is a ridiculous lie.
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
Yep. Too bad one wasn't done on obuthole, we would be far better off.
You white boys didnt do your job did you? I bet that burns your ass everytime you realize your taxes will go to support the POTUS in retirement?
Impeach him and try him after he leaves office. He will get the same support as any other criminal.
Why would I impeach him? I think he is doing a great job even with racist white repubs trying to block him.
 
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris

Obama want to LEAVE HIS MARK
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris

Obama want to LEAVE HIS MARK
Like, pissing on parking meters?
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris

Obama want to LEAVE HIS MARK
Like, pissing on parking meters?

something like that
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
Yep. Too bad one wasn't done on obuthole, we would be far better off.
You white boys didnt do your job did you? I bet that burns your ass everytime you realize your taxes will go to support the POTUS in retirement?
Impeach him and try him after he leaves office. He will get the same support as any other criminal.
Why would I impeach him? I think he is doing a great job even with racist white repubs trying to block him.

I think he is doing a marvy job too------he is letting things go to hell to the
point that intensive backlash in inevitable
 
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris
Frothing at the mouth again are we, Kosherkunt. LOL.

list the reasons you want syrian "refugees" in america.
 
Detailed background checks? :laugh:
Yep. Too bad one wasn't done on obuthole, we would be far better off.
You white boys didnt do your job did you? I bet that burns your ass everytime you realize your taxes will go to support the POTUS in retirement?
Impeach him and try him after he leaves office. He will get the same support as any other criminal.
Why would I impeach him? I think he is doing a great job even with racist white repubs trying to block him.

I think he is doing a marvy job too------he is letting things go to hell to the
point that intensive backlash in inevitable
Sorry to inform you he is not letting things go to hell. Either way racists were going to have a backlash. That was expected and really of no importance to be honest. Just a lot of noise.
 
So..in a nutshell...

He will continue to take Syrian refugees without doing detailed background checks (and in fact specifically accepting terrorists who can give a good enough *reason* to come to the US that it pasts muster), and he is going to continue to empty out Gitmo (including bin Laden's bodyguard) no matter what the people, or Congress, say.

He's a criminal and a traitor. He deserves the death penalty.

"
As Katie Pavlich notes, this move comes not just hours after the Paris attacks, but just days after Congress overwhelmingly passed a defense spending authorization that forbids any resources being used for closing Gitmo. Obama obviously intends this as a signal to Congress over his steadfastness in closing Gitmo. Given the proximity of the release to the attacks in Paris, it looks more like a signal of the Obama administration’s steadfast desire to disentangle itself from the fight against ISIS, a fight that the administration insists needs no changes to its current strategy of pinpricks and wheedling of others to fight instead.
"The time to release prisoners in the war on terror is when it has been concluded. That depends in large part on the allies of these terrorists still in detention. We didn’t start the war, and it hasn’t ended; in fact, in the past two-plus years, the Obama administration sat on the sidelines while the threat escalated into a quasi-state, which has expanded into a failed state in Libya created by Obama and Hillary Clinton. We have no obligation to bolster the ranks of those enemies while the fight is escalating, and the signal it sends is one of dangerous weakness and short-sightedness. "

It's not weakness or short sightedness. It's treason.

Suspected OBL bodyguard, four others released from Gitmo two days after Paris
Frothing at the mouth again are we, Kosherkunt. LOL.

list the reasons you want syrian "refugees" in america.
list the reasons anyone should think you are smart enough to understand.
 

Forum List

Back
Top