Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More word games and you haven't answered the question. If no one doubted the word of the Director of the CIA why was a law EVER created? Or rather why doesn't the law just say "ask the Director"
I think she falls under the legal definition of covert as well. As I can recall, it does not say that an agent has to be "stationed" outside of the US within five years, but only that they need to have "served" outside of the US within the last five years.
I served on several tours in the med and in westpac, but was always stationed in conus.
now.... tell me why you think you know more than the director of central intelligence.
What are you talking about SGT?More word games and you haven't answered the question. If no one doubted the word of the Director of the CIA why was a law EVER created? Or rather why doesn't the law just say "ask the Director"
I bet that the people refusing to acknoledge Plame's status would still refuse and hide behind a strawman even if jesus personally showed them his "She was a Covert Agent" tattoo on the small of his back...
Answer my question. As to this new question, I recall your insistance that anyone voting for war had abdicated their responsibility by doing so, The Law exists and is quite plain, anyone simply accepting the "word" of the CIA is abdicating their responsibility under the law.
(4) The term “covert agent” means—
(A) a present or retired officer or employee of an intelligence agency or a present or retired member of the Armed Forces assigned to duty with an intelligence agency—
(i) whose identity as such an officer, employee, or member is classified information, and
(ii) who is serving outside the United States or has within the last five years served outside the United States; or
(B) a United States citizen whose intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information, and—
(i) who resides and acts outside the United States as an agent of, or informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency, or
(ii) who is at the time of the disclosure acting as an agent of, or informant to, the foreign counterintelligence or foreign counterterrorism components of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; or
I answered your question....I understand that there is a law...by my reading of the text of that law, Plame falls under the umbrella of covert status..... I am not suggesting that we take the DCI's opinion alone. I do not, however, understand the reason for your unwillingness to take his opinion AT ALL nor your unwillingness to discuss the "stationed" versus "served" issue.
Here is the Definition under us code 50 section 426 of the identities protection Act:
you don't even need to use the word "served" outside of the USA, because Plame fits the second definition too.
Armitage was not charged because he reported his comments right away and was shown not to realise she was covert.
To be charged with a crime it has to be proven you did it knowingly.
Fitzgerald has already said Libbys lies have shut down the attempt at getting to the facts of the case.
If they accept that she was a covert agent then they will have to accept the Veep being a traitor imo.
And they will NEVER do that.... sadly, they'd rather risk our national security and an agent's life and the security of other CIA agents than to admit or even contemplate this.... imo
January 20 2009 can not get here quick enough as far as I am concerned.
If they accept that she was a covert agent then they will have to accept the Veep being a traitor imo.
And they will NEVER do that.... sadly, they'd rather risk our national security and an agent's life and the security of other CIA agents than to admit or even contemplate this.... imo
January 20 2009 can not get here quick enough as far as I am concerned.
I am aware that Armitage leaked this info too, that does not negate that Libby and Rove ALSO leaked the information to the Press regarding Valerie Plame. One does not negate the other.Another bald face lie. I repeat , are you aware that Armitage "outed" Plume? That Armitage is not a croony of the Vice President? That there is ZERO evidence to support your lie that the Vice President is a Traitor?
LOL, if Armitage "outed" her and has ADMITTED it, why are you and others insisting it was a nefarious plot by the White House? And you have JUST admitted Libby was prosecuted in an attempt to scare him into rolling over on someone more important.
Did you even consider that he couldn't roll on someone because the charge was incorrect?
Another bald face lie. I repeat , are you aware that Armitage "outed" Plume? That Armitage is not a croony of the Vice President? That there is ZERO evidence to support your lie that the Vice President is a Traitor?