Ohio gunman described himself as pro Satan 'leftist' supported Liz Warren

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yeah, this time's different.... everyone is heading for the exits..

So WHEN the Trump Recession comes, does that still make him a good president?

Do you still consider Bill Clinton a good President?

The POTUS is not in control over the entire economy, the private sector is. All a President can do is make it more or less inviting for businesses to expand, create jobs, and set wages. Will this economy last forever, of course not. It never has. The problem with Trump however is the media. The first sign of trouble, the MSM will convince people that we are headed for a recession, and that's what's likely to happen because the MSM brainwashes people with weak minds, and has reported over 90% negative on Trump in spite of the best economic times in the last few decades.

So you got a still showing that? Because I've looked at that tape, the kid is just standing there when this cop car barrels down on him, Officer McCrybaby jumps out and blows him away.

What the jury found is that his right shoulder went up as if he was pulling something out of his pants. The gun was hidden behind the police car. The officers reported that's exactly what happened, and the gun was found next to him right after the shooting. Forensic science concurred.

Or they realized they had no jurisdiction... Now, part of the problem with Holder is that he tended to run his mouth without checking what his actual legal options were, which is why he made a lot of noise about Trayvon Martin and Mike Brown when he really couldn't do anything.

If it was found an officer was guilty of anything, yes, the feds can charge the officer with a civil rights violation. That's why Racist Holder said what he did. Investigations showed no laws being broken by an officer in the Brown and Rice shootings. The Martin shooting was purely self-defense according to the jury even though he was charged with the shooting.

I've been to your city.. it doesn't look like you have the revenue for that.

Then how did they assume we had the money for a 2.5 million dollar dirt bike park?

So someone realized that you didn't have the money for something that was probably a good idea... but um, if your cops are so overworked that they can't solve murders, WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY DOING BUSTING KIDS RIDING BIKES!?!?

I guess we should be glad the mayor's grandson didn't run into Officer McCrybaby, he'd have probably shot him.

Would have been the best thing too. Afterwards, his grandson got busted with an illegal gun, pot and a scale. His main concern is that he didn't lose his government job at the water department. Gee,I wonder how he got that job??? Later, his great grandson also got busted for conceal carry. He was 13. The Mayor said in a statement that people feel the need to protect themselves.

Kids get hurt on dirt bikes Joe. We are a city, not out in the country. A good idea? Yeah, well how do you suppose those kids would have gotten to the dirt bike park? I don't know many kids with a pickup truck and a bike trailer. Furthermore by the city providing such facilities, it would have placed liability on the city in the event of a serious injury or death. Real good idea.

Well, let's look at that. Even though Cleveland is only 39% White, it's police department is 64% white... And they have to import guys like Crybaby Loehmann to keep it white, I guess.

It's tough to get good cops. Cleveland (like your city) is a dangerous job for a police officer. One of my coworkers is a retired Cleveland cop. He told me himself he'd never want to be a cop in Cleveland today. If he was stuck there, he'd probably put applications in at other cities just to get the hell out of there.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Again, anything that happened under DumBama was the result of Quantitive Easing; look it up. Furthermore is the fact that no real impact took place in our economy until the fuel prices drastically decreased which Ears had absolutely nothing to do with. It was fracking that not only gave us the energy to reduce costs, but to be the worlds largest energy supplier. Hussein and the Democrats have long stood against fracking and still do.

$3.33 at the pump today? What cheap gas?

You live in a blue area where taxes are likely most of the problem. It's about $2.80 here. In such great economic times, gasoline would normally be over $4.00 here and near $5.00 where you live.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So what damage do you speak of? The great economy, low taxes, what?

The debt increases regardless who is President, so that seems to be a problem nobody can stop. The right wants to use money to protect the country and take less from citizens, and the left wants to use the money for......yes.......socialism.

I just explained why they back up Trump, and that is Trump is attending to (or trying to) the border problem. Even the Nazi's are smart enough to see the entire Democrat plan, and that is to make whites a minority in this country for the first time in history. When they succeed in that, we will be taking the first step towards ending the Great Experiment.

I read "Free Ride, Free Ride, Free Ride" over and over again. The Debt can be take care of. Yes it takes years and decades but it can be taken care. But it has to start. The ones you insult by calling them Rinos are almost all Fiscal Conservatives. That was the main focus of the Republican Party before the Party of Trump and of course Bush Jr.. AFter the party of Trump is gone, it's going to take at least 10 years to put the Republican Party back together again where it can become a Fiscal force once again. So don't give me that crap that no one can do anything about it. That's just another free ride.

The Border Problem was created by Trump who went after the Muslims. It just so happens that it affected the southern borders as an after thought. The 2000 and 3000 person carvans didn't exist before. Before, the seekers could either make their way to the US Embassy in their respective countries or jump across to another country and apply there. About 15% were approved and there were non profit agencies that would assist them getting to the US and doing all the paperwork. But when that was ended, here they came, all of them. What was left was that they had to get into the US and apply for asylum in the US. Once more, you just gave another free ride. You will notice that the 2000 and 3000 person caravans have stopped. It isn't just Mexico putting a stop to it. They can now apply for asylum in different countries at the US Embasies like it always we before your Goon screwed the pooch. But everyone is stuck with the thousands that are already at the border now and they have no way or how to go anywhere else.

Speaking of taking less from the Citizens. My Taxes went up. My Medicare went down, my Tricare went down. yes, others benefited from it but NOT the seniors that paid into the Social Security all of their lives. And that isn't Trumps money. It's MY money and he is just stealing.

What country do you live in? The southern border has been a problem for generations. Even Reagan addressed this problem when he gave amnesty to all those illegals. The Democrats promised if he did that, they would take action on the border which they never did. This hardly started with Trump.

Invaders are using our own system against us. They know when they get here, they will never be granted asylum in most cases. But in the past, YES, THE PAST, they were given court dates which they never attended; at least not the final one where the final decision was made. But they applied for asylum because it was a way to enter the country without crossing rivers or deserts. After they applied, we let them in to wait years for their date. It has nothing to do with being able to apply elsewhere.

The slowdown is because of Mexico's actions on their southern border. Every border agent I seen being interviewed credits Trump with that. As for your Medicare or SS, if you live the average lifespan in this country, you will withdraw much, much more than you put in. That's why the system is failing.

If we want to keep these programs (and most Americans do) then we need to fund them. That's all. I haven't had a raise in SS or Medicare deductions in many years, even decades with Medicare. How is it insurance companies have to keep raising rates annually, and the government, not one cent????

It used to be a very much smaller problem when we primarily had only to deal with Mexicans illegally entering into the US. Hardly any children. The Border Patrol knew how to handle that and had the manpower, resources and training to do that job. But the refusal of the Embassies in the other countries to accept the applications for entry made the journey from the top 3 Central American Countries a necessity to those people where if they make it to the US Soil, they can apply. That was an offshoot of the Muslim game Trump dreamed up in 2017. You are still giving him a free ride.

Yes, it's a mess now and we need to temporarily fund it. And the Embassies are now able to process the applications once again. It's not all Mexican intervention and never was. That's Trump trying to make you look another direction to hide his gaff. No more free rides. We need to get a handle on it and get the Border Patrol back to patrolling the border. Even if it means increasing the funding. But we are paying for a Trump mistake. No more free rides on this one.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Asylum claims always had to be made on our land. After Trump ordered foreigners to apply at their embassies, a liberal judge stopped it, just like they stopped him from refusing asylum claims if they didn't come in at a point of entry.

Nearly all of Trump's attempts to control the border were stopped by congressional Democrats or commie activist judges. Left without resistance, the border problems would be pretty much solved today. All the great ideas to control the problem came from Trump, and stopped by Democrats, because Democrats want as many of these vermin in the country as they can get.

Trump created the problem. He stopped the asylum seekers ability to apply at "Friendly" countries US Embassies until just about a month ago. His target was to stop Muslims from the Middle East but that change in policy had a negative affect in Central America. People used to jump the border into Mexico, apply at the nearest US Embassy, get the process started, go back to their home countries and wait. About 15% of these applications were approved. There were non profits that would then assist the ones that were approved in the paperwork, transportation and financial to get to the United States and usually have a job waiting for them. The President has complete autonomy over this. When he stopped this method due to his Muslim scare, it caused thousands of people from central America to have no choice but to make the journey to the US Borders and take advantage of the Feet Dry law that a President doesn't have any control over.

To add to the disaster, there is an exerpt from a Refugee and Asylum page.
Refugees and Asylees in the United States
In 2017, the Trump administration implemented increased vetting for refugees, citing security concerns; this slowed the process of admissions. Furthermore, President Trump reduced the number of refugees the United States accepts annually—first reducing the 110,000 level originally set for FY 2017 by the Obama administration to 50,000, then to 45,000 for FY 2018, and to a record low of 30,000 for FY 2019. Approximately 15,000 refugees had been resettled during the first seven months of FY 2019 (October 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019).

So the numbers at the border continued to pile up due to the lessening of the immigration numbers. And the fact that the immigrants could no longer apply for asylum in friendly countries force then to make it to the US Borders and apply feet dry. Before, the ones that weren't approved by the US Embassies in the Friendly Countries knew that they would also not be approved at the border so they didn't make the journey. Yes, some did with the express intention of illegal crossing but the majority just went home. Trumps policies brought this into being. It became an Emergency only after the Trump Policy Changes directed at the Muslim Nations also affected the Central American Nations. Trump didn't think this one out very well and it blew up in all our faces. So don't give him another free ride on this one. You do that too much already.

Wrong. You always had to apply at our port of entry for asylum. You could never apply from an embassy. I tried to find a link to that, but unfortunately, most are from law offices and they don't have the date just like the government. However, if you do a Google search of "how do I apply for US asylum" and put the dates between 2010 and 2015, you can finds hundreds of sites supporting my claim. You have to be at a port of entry. Trump is the only one that tried to change that, and the courts are still giving him a problem because it's always been law.

Anti-Trump pro immigrant groups are responsible for the increase of immigration flow. These trips costs several thousand dollars for each immigrant, and given their poverty status, it's likely the money needed for the journey is not coming out of their pockets.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...aravans_encouraged_by_honduras_and_soros.html

Asylum seekers and refugees are two totally different subjects. They are not the same, nor handled by our government the same.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You mean that they will nominate someone with 40 years of experience in government instead of a racist game show host?

Yeah, man, that's crazy talk.

Why not? The last President of theirs was a community organizer that didn't even have a year of experience as a Senator. He never ran a business in his life.

 

[deanrd]

Could you guys please quote comments from Elizabeth Warren that match the comments of Donald Trump? And as a reminder here are a few of the more inflammatory Trump comments:

Well?

Well?



Thought so.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Could you guys please quote comments from Elizabeth Warren that match the comments of Donald Trump? And as a reminder here are a few of the more inflammatory Trump comments:

Well?

Well?



Thought so.

How about if we quote the left in general, particularly on CNN and other places where they interview commies?

 

[jc456]

So now the definition of fascism:

noun
(sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc.,and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
(sometimes initial capital letter) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
(initial capital letter) a political movement that employs the principles and methods of fascism,especially the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43.

Definition of fascism | Dictionary.com

Unless you are going to lie about it, these definitions are more left than right. Let's look at that:

A dictator having complete power, and forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism. Now who is it that sends people to opposition rallies to disrupt them? Who is it that stops rallies with threats or violence? Who is it that marches in protest at their colleges to stop conservative speakers? Who is it that sent government agencies to spy on a political opponent and even illegally submitted false documents to get surveillance warrants? Who said that you should "shout them down" anytime you are in presence of conservatives at a restaurant?

Rap Sheet: ***639*** Acts of Media-Approved Violence and Harassment Against Trump Supporters | Breitbart

Regimenting all industry and commerce. How, by lowering their taxes and removing regulations?

Who is it that "regimented" industries like Solyndara, Planned Parenthood, electric cars manufacturers, trial lawyers? Who uses taxpayer money to subsidize windmill and solar panel industries and instillation? Who closed down auto dealerships?

No one "regimented" those companies. There are all (or were) privately owned.

And the ones where Trump lowered their taxes and removed regulations were not?

Put 100 people in a room and ask them if they have gained anything at all with scum bags tax cut for the rich and they will just laugh at you. Regulations are there to protect us, not from the slime of big government but protect us from the slime of big business , These regulation cutting ding dong's on the right are here trying to convince us that big business can be trusted to take care of us , These people want a nanny state having big business take care of us. Ya sure they can be trusted, I trust government 100 times over big business, simply because of the influence of money profits in big business. Without regulations they would eat our children for their bottom line.

Those tax cuts and regulation removals are responsible for the economy we have today. Lowest unemployment in nearly 50 years, and at this pace, we are likely to beat that record as well. Consumer confidence at it's highest level. Small business confidence at record levels since polling started. Lowest unemployment for minorities since records were kept. Household income hitting a new high along with the constant stock market records.

Unless somebody is totally ignorant of tax filings, most people would say tax cuts have worked for them, especially if they filed their 2018 returns. Next year the Commie Care fine will be removed, and there will be even more of a savings for POOR AND MIDDLE-CLASS families.

Most people benefited from rich to poor with Trump's tax policies. Get with the program.

Unless you can show me ,with a chart, that shows that anything changed as far as the rate of increase in any aspects of our economy from Obama's presidency till now , then this is still Obama's economy , every chart representing all aspects of our economy show either a slowdown when scum bag came into office or staying flat , holding the same rate on increase as Obamas years in office, You can't do this because there isn't any chart that shows that scum bag contributed in any way to our economy , To repeat myself for the hundredth time , it is only Scum bags economy if he did anything at all to help in any way across the board any aspect of our economy , hell this isn't rocket science .

Son nothing we could provide will change or even have you reconsider your nonsense belief.

No objectivity

 

[Daryl Hunt]

I read "Free Ride, Free Ride, Free Ride" over and over again. The Debt can be take care of. Yes it takes years and decades but it can be taken care. But it has to start. The ones you insult by calling them Rinos are almost all Fiscal Conservatives. That was the main focus of the Republican Party before the Party of Trump and of course Bush Jr.. AFter the party of Trump is gone, it's going to take at least 10 years to put the Republican Party back together again where it can become a Fiscal force once again. So don't give me that crap that no one can do anything about it. That's just another free ride.

The Border Problem was created by Trump who went after the Muslims. It just so happens that it affected the southern borders as an after thought. The 2000 and 3000 person carvans didn't exist before. Before, the seekers could either make their way to the US Embassy in their respective countries or jump across to another country and apply there. About 15% were approved and there were non profit agencies that would assist them getting to the US and doing all the paperwork. But when that was ended, here they came, all of them. What was left was that they had to get into the US and apply for asylum in the US. Once more, you just gave another free ride. You will notice that the 2000 and 3000 person caravans have stopped. It isn't just Mexico putting a stop to it. They can now apply for asylum in different countries at the US Embasies like it always we before your Goon screwed the pooch. But everyone is stuck with the thousands that are already at the border now and they have no way or how to go anywhere else.

Speaking of taking less from the Citizens. My Taxes went up. My Medicare went down, my Tricare went down. yes, others benefited from it but NOT the seniors that paid into the Social Security all of their lives. And that isn't Trumps money. It's MY money and he is just stealing.

What country do you live in? The southern border has been a problem for generations. Even Reagan addressed this problem when he gave amnesty to all those illegals. The Democrats promised if he did that, they would take action on the border which they never did. This hardly started with Trump.

Invaders are using our own system against us. They know when they get here, they will never be granted asylum in most cases. But in the past, YES, THE PAST, they were given court dates which they never attended; at least not the final one where the final decision was made. But they applied for asylum because it was a way to enter the country without crossing rivers or deserts. After they applied, we let them in to wait years for their date. It has nothing to do with being able to apply elsewhere.

The slowdown is because of Mexico's actions on their southern border. Every border agent I seen being interviewed credits Trump with that. As for your Medicare or SS, if you live the average lifespan in this country, you will withdraw much, much more than you put in. That's why the system is failing.

If we want to keep these programs (and most Americans do) then we need to fund them. That's all. I haven't had a raise in SS or Medicare deductions in many years, even decades with Medicare. How is it insurance companies have to keep raising rates annually, and the government, not one cent????

It used to be a very much smaller problem when we primarily had only to deal with Mexicans illegally entering into the US. Hardly any children. The Border Patrol knew how to handle that and had the manpower, resources and training to do that job. But the refusal of the Embassies in the other countries to accept the applications for entry made the journey from the top 3 Central American Countries a necessity to those people where if they make it to the US Soil, they can apply. That was an offshoot of the Muslim game Trump dreamed up in 2017. You are still giving him a free ride.

Yes, it's a mess now and we need to temporarily fund it. And the Embassies are now able to process the applications once again. It's not all Mexican intervention and never was. That's Trump trying to make you look another direction to hide his gaff. No more free rides. We need to get a handle on it and get the Border Patrol back to patrolling the border. Even if it means increasing the funding. But we are paying for a Trump mistake. No more free rides on this one.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Asylum claims always had to be made on our land. After Trump ordered foreigners to apply at their embassies, a liberal judge stopped it, just like they stopped him from refusing asylum claims if they didn't come in at a point of entry.

Nearly all of Trump's attempts to control the border were stopped by congressional Democrats or commie activist judges. Left without resistance, the border problems would be pretty much solved today. All the great ideas to control the problem came from Trump, and stopped by Democrats, because Democrats want as many of these vermin in the country as they can get.

Trump created the problem. He stopped the asylum seekers ability to apply at "Friendly" countries US Embassies until just about a month ago. His target was to stop Muslims from the Middle East but that change in policy had a negative affect in Central America. People used to jump the border into Mexico, apply at the nearest US Embassy, get the process started, go back to their home countries and wait. About 15% of these applications were approved. There were non profits that would then assist the ones that were approved in the paperwork, transportation and financial to get to the United States and usually have a job waiting for them. The President has complete autonomy over this. When he stopped this method due to his Muslim scare, it caused thousands of people from central America to have no choice but to make the journey to the US Borders and take advantage of the Feet Dry law that a President doesn't have any control over.

To add to the disaster, there is an exerpt from a Refugee and Asylum page.
Refugees and Asylees in the United States
In 2017, the Trump administration implemented increased vetting for refugees, citing security concerns; this slowed the process of admissions. Furthermore, President Trump reduced the number of refugees the United States accepts annually—first reducing the 110,000 level originally set for FY 2017 by the Obama administration to 50,000, then to 45,000 for FY 2018, and to a record low of 30,000 for FY 2019. Approximately 15,000 refugees had been resettled during the first seven months of FY 2019 (October 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019).

So the numbers at the border continued to pile up due to the lessening of the immigration numbers. And the fact that the immigrants could no longer apply for asylum in friendly countries force then to make it to the US Borders and apply feet dry. Before, the ones that weren't approved by the US Embassies in the Friendly Countries knew that they would also not be approved at the border so they didn't make the journey. Yes, some did with the express intention of illegal crossing but the majority just went home. Trumps policies brought this into being. It became an Emergency only after the Trump Policy Changes directed at the Muslim Nations also affected the Central American Nations. Trump didn't think this one out very well and it blew up in all our faces. So don't give him another free ride on this one. You do that too much already.

Wrong. You always had to apply at our port of entry for asylum. You could never apply from an embassy. I tried to find a link to that, but unfortunately, most are from law offices and they don't have the date just like the government. However, if you do a Google search of "how do I apply for US asylum" and put the dates between 2010 and 2015, you can finds hundreds of sites supporting my claim. You have to be at a port of entry. Trump is the only one that tried to change that, and the courts are still giving him a problem because it's always been law.

Anti-Trump pro immigrant groups are responsible for the increase of immigration flow. These trips costs several thousand dollars for each immigrant, and given their poverty status, it's likely the money needed for the journey is not coming out of their pockets.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...aravans_encouraged_by_honduras_and_soros.html

Asylum seekers and refugees are two totally different subjects. They are not the same, nor handled by our government the same.

The one thing a person needs to come to the US is to get a Visa. And a Visa can be obtained at a friendly nation US Embassy like Mexico. That is until 2017 by order of Trump. Once you obtain that Visa, you can travel to the United States and within one year, apply for Asylum. You stay inside the US with your Visa legally while your case is being reviewed and ruled on. It might take up to 1 year. But your Visa is probably good for 5 years. If you started out in a Central American Country, travel into Mexico for about 40 miles and you come to your first US Embassy. You apply there. About 15% of those that applied before 2017 were approved and those agencies you say are sponsoring the Caravans are actually there to assist that 15% in travel, financing, jobs, etc.. Your news agencies are just taking a bit of truth and twisting it into a bunch of lies.

In 2017, Trump removed the Favorable Nations Visa program for many countries including Mexico and most Middle Eastern Countries. Almost every Western Nation in the world has a Favorable Nation Visa Program. Some, like Brazil, are very strict while others like Cambodia is just after the 40 bucks. Whether the US has one or not is strictly up to the Administration. And Trump was legal to modify it any way he wished. Congress and the Supreme Court could change that but hadn't yet. But both were very close to doing just that. Trump changed it back this year to the way it was.

Stop lying. Your boy blew it big time, it blew up in all our faces and now we have to deal with the aftermath.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What country do you live in? The southern border has been a problem for generations. Even Reagan addressed this problem when he gave amnesty to all those illegals. The Democrats promised if he did that, they would take action on the border which they never did. This hardly started with Trump.

Invaders are using our own system against us. They know when they get here, they will never be granted asylum in most cases. But in the past, YES, THE PAST, they were given court dates which they never attended; at least not the final one where the final decision was made. But they applied for asylum because it was a way to enter the country without crossing rivers or deserts. After they applied, we let them in to wait years for their date. It has nothing to do with being able to apply elsewhere.

The slowdown is because of Mexico's actions on their southern border. Every border agent I seen being interviewed credits Trump with that. As for your Medicare or SS, if you live the average lifespan in this country, you will withdraw much, much more than you put in. That's why the system is failing.

If we want to keep these programs (and most Americans do) then we need to fund them. That's all. I haven't had a raise in SS or Medicare deductions in many years, even decades with Medicare. How is it insurance companies have to keep raising rates annually, and the government, not one cent????

It used to be a very much smaller problem when we primarily had only to deal with Mexicans illegally entering into the US. Hardly any children. The Border Patrol knew how to handle that and had the manpower, resources and training to do that job. But the refusal of the Embassies in the other countries to accept the applications for entry made the journey from the top 3 Central American Countries a necessity to those people where if they make it to the US Soil, they can apply. That was an offshoot of the Muslim game Trump dreamed up in 2017. You are still giving him a free ride.

Yes, it's a mess now and we need to temporarily fund it. And the Embassies are now able to process the applications once again. It's not all Mexican intervention and never was. That's Trump trying to make you look another direction to hide his gaff. No more free rides. We need to get a handle on it and get the Border Patrol back to patrolling the border. Even if it means increasing the funding. But we are paying for a Trump mistake. No more free rides on this one.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Asylum claims always had to be made on our land. After Trump ordered foreigners to apply at their embassies, a liberal judge stopped it, just like they stopped him from refusing asylum claims if they didn't come in at a point of entry.

Nearly all of Trump's attempts to control the border were stopped by congressional Democrats or commie activist judges. Left without resistance, the border problems would be pretty much solved today. All the great ideas to control the problem came from Trump, and stopped by Democrats, because Democrats want as many of these vermin in the country as they can get.

Trump created the problem. He stopped the asylum seekers ability to apply at "Friendly" countries US Embassies until just about a month ago. His target was to stop Muslims from the Middle East but that change in policy had a negative affect in Central America. People used to jump the border into Mexico, apply at the nearest US Embassy, get the process started, go back to their home countries and wait. About 15% of these applications were approved. There were non profits that would then assist the ones that were approved in the paperwork, transportation and financial to get to the United States and usually have a job waiting for them. The President has complete autonomy over this. When he stopped this method due to his Muslim scare, it caused thousands of people from central America to have no choice but to make the journey to the US Borders and take advantage of the Feet Dry law that a President doesn't have any control over.

To add to the disaster, there is an exerpt from a Refugee and Asylum page.
Refugees and Asylees in the United States
In 2017, the Trump administration implemented increased vetting for refugees, citing security concerns; this slowed the process of admissions. Furthermore, President Trump reduced the number of refugees the United States accepts annually—first reducing the 110,000 level originally set for FY 2017 by the Obama administration to 50,000, then to 45,000 for FY 2018, and to a record low of 30,000 for FY 2019. Approximately 15,000 refugees had been resettled during the first seven months of FY 2019 (October 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019).

So the numbers at the border continued to pile up due to the lessening of the immigration numbers. And the fact that the immigrants could no longer apply for asylum in friendly countries force then to make it to the US Borders and apply feet dry. Before, the ones that weren't approved by the US Embassies in the Friendly Countries knew that they would also not be approved at the border so they didn't make the journey. Yes, some did with the express intention of illegal crossing but the majority just went home. Trumps policies brought this into being. It became an Emergency only after the Trump Policy Changes directed at the Muslim Nations also affected the Central American Nations. Trump didn't think this one out very well and it blew up in all our faces. So don't give him another free ride on this one. You do that too much already.

Wrong. You always had to apply at our port of entry for asylum. You could never apply from an embassy. I tried to find a link to that, but unfortunately, most are from law offices and they don't have the date just like the government. However, if you do a Google search of "how do I apply for US asylum" and put the dates between 2010 and 2015, you can finds hundreds of sites supporting my claim. You have to be at a port of entry. Trump is the only one that tried to change that, and the courts are still giving him a problem because it's always been law.

Anti-Trump pro immigrant groups are responsible for the increase of immigration flow. These trips costs several thousand dollars for each immigrant, and given their poverty status, it's likely the money needed for the journey is not coming out of their pockets.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...aravans_encouraged_by_honduras_and_soros.html

Asylum seekers and refugees are two totally different subjects. They are not the same, nor handled by our government the same.

The one thing a person needs to come to the US is to get a Visa. And a Visa can be obtained at a friendly nation US Embassy like Mexico. That is until 2017 by order of Trump. Once you obtain that Visa, you can travel to the United States and within one year, apply for Asylum. You stay inside the US with your Visa legally while your case is being reviewed and ruled on. It might take up to 1 year. But your Visa is probably good for 5 years. If you started out in a Central American Country, travel into Mexico for about 40 miles and you come to your first US Embassy. You apply there. About 15% of those that applied before 2017 were approved and those agencies you say are sponsoring the Caravans are actually there to assist that 15% in travel, financing, jobs, etc.. Your news agencies are just taking a bit of truth and twisting it into a bunch of lies.

In 2017, Trump removed the Favorable Nations Visa program for many countries including Mexico and most Middle Eastern Countries. Almost every Western Nation in the world has a Favorable Nation Visa Program. Some, like Brazil, are very strict while others like Cambodia is just after the 40 bucks. Whether the US has one or not is strictly up to the Administration. And Trump was legal to modify it any way he wished. Congress and the Supreme Court could change that but hadn't yet. But both were very close to doing just that. Trump changed it back this year to the way it was.

Stop lying. Your boy blew it big time, it blew up in all our faces and now we have to deal with the aftermath.

Now you are moving the goal posts. First you made claim asylum seekers could apply at an embassy for asylum, and now that you found out you're wrong, changing it to applying for a Visa.

Visa's are not easy to get. Coming to the border, applying for asylum, and being let into the country never to be seen again is much easier. That's why Trump is trying to put a stop to it.

As for Visa's, the same problem. Most of the illegals here today once had a valid Visa that expired, and they never left. So if Trump is clamping down on Visa's, I have no problem with that as most are abusing them, just like they abuse our asylum and anchor baby laws.

And actually, if it were up to me, I'd close down the southern border altogether.

 

[jbander]

No one "regimented" those companies. There are all (or were) privately owned.

And the ones where Trump lowered their taxes and removed regulations were not?

Put 100 people in a room and ask them if they have gained anything at all with scum bags tax cut for the rich and they will just laugh at you. Regulations are there to protect us, not from the slime of big government but protect us from the slime of big business , These regulation cutting ding dong's on the right are here trying to convince us that big business can be trusted to take care of us , These people want a nanny state having big business take care of us. Ya sure they can be trusted, I trust government 100 times over big business, simply because of the influence of money profits in big business. Without regulations they would eat our children for their bottom line.

Those tax cuts and regulation removals are responsible for the economy we have today. Lowest unemployment in nearly 50 years, and at this pace, we are likely to beat that record as well. Consumer confidence at it's highest level. Small business confidence at record levels since polling started. Lowest unemployment for minorities since records were kept. Household income hitting a new high along with the constant stock market records.

Unless somebody is totally ignorant of tax filings, most people would say tax cuts have worked for them, especially if they filed their 2018 returns. Next year the Commie Care fine will be removed, and there will be even more of a savings for POOR AND MIDDLE-CLASS families.

Most people benefited from rich to poor with Trump's tax policies. Get with the program.

Unless you can show me ,with a chart, that shows that anything changed as far as the rate of increase in any aspects of our economy from Obama's presidency till now , then this is still Obama's economy , every chart representing all aspects of our economy show either a slowdown when scum bag came into office or staying flat , holding the same rate on increase as Obamas years in office, You can't do this because there isn't any chart that shows that scum bag contributed in any way to our economy , To repeat myself for the hundredth time , it is only Scum bags economy if he did anything at all to help in any way across the board any aspect of our economy , hell this isn't rocket science .

It must be rocket science to you because you still can't figure it out.

How much lower can unemployment get than the lowest in 49 years? When was the last time in our country when we had several million more jobs than people to fill them?

Ya lets take a look at facts, What does this chart show , It shows that your party is totally at fault for the large unemployment in the first place, because of Bush the baby killers presidency. Then It show a brilliant piece of work by Obama to fix that problem and it shows that when Trotsky Trump came into office the rate of decline slowed To the point that we would have done better if Trotsky wasn't in office at all and in fact if nobody was in office through those year of The Trotsky dynasty. So Comrade Your remark is as always , just dumb.

 

[JoeB131]

Do you still consider Bill Clinton a good President?

The POTUS is not in control over the entire economy, the private sector is. All a President can do is make it more or less inviting for businesses to expand, create jobs, and set wages. Will this economy last forever, of course not. It never has. The problem with Trump however is the media. The first sign of trouble, the MSM will convince people that we are headed for a recession, and that's what's likely to happen because the MSM brainwashes people with weak minds, and has reported over 90% negative on Trump in spite of the best economic times in the last few decades.

Wow, Ray, making excuses already...

What the jury found is that his right shoulder went up as if he was pulling something out of his pants. The gun was hidden behind the police car. The officers reported that's exactly what happened, and the gun was found next to him right after the shooting. Forensic science concurred.

24 mutants waiting for the lunch bell to ring... they'd have said Tamir was riding a magic uniform if that meant McGinty would have let them out earlier.

Here's the problem. McGinty went into that grand jury with the intent to exonerate Officer Crybaby... This was like the EXACT OPPOSITE OF HIS JOB AS A PROSECUTOR.

Would have been the best thing too. Afterwards, his grandson got busted with an illegal gun, pot and a scale. His main concern is that he didn't lose his government job at the water department. Gee,I wonder how he got that job??? Later, his great grandson also got busted for conceal carry. He was 13. The Mayor said in a statement that people feel the need to protect themselves.

Again, whacko pointing gun as an avatar is surprised the darkies want to carry them, too.

Kids get hurt on dirt bikes Joe. We are a city, not out in the country. A good idea? Yeah, well how do you suppose those kids would have gotten to the dirt bike park? I don't know many kids with a pickup truck and a bike trailer. Furthermore by the city providing such facilities, it would have placed liability on the city in the event of a serious injury or death. Real good idea.

You don't think there would have been a liability if they got hit on the street?

Mind you, the best thing they could do to Cleveland would be to bulldoze the whole thing and start over.

 

[JoeB131]

You live in a blue area where taxes are likely most of the problem. It's about $2.80 here. In such great economic times, gasoline would normally be over $4.00 here and near $5.00 where you live.

2.80 is still really fucking expensive. I'm amazed how often you take it in the ass from big business, and they don't even give you a reach around.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You live in a blue area where taxes are likely most of the problem. It's about $2.80 here. In such great economic times, gasoline would normally be over $4.00 here and near $5.00 where you live.

2.80 is still really fucking expensive. I'm amazed how often you take it in the ass from big business, and they don't even give you a reach around.

Big business doesn't set the prices, the commodity market actually does. $2.80 is reasonable considering our new Governor put a 10 cents per gallon road tax on the fuel; 19 cents per gallon on diesel. Given our economy and prices of fuel in the past, we are not doing all that bad.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

24 mutants waiting for the lunch bell to ring... they'd have said Tamir was riding a magic uniform if that meant McGinty would have let them out earlier.

Here's the problem. McGinty went into that grand jury with the intent to exonerate Officer Crybaby... This was like the EXACT OPPOSITE OF HIS JOB AS A PROSECUTOR.

You have no idea what he did or said in that hearing. It was pretty closed up. As always, you are making assumptions and convincing yourself it is truth.

Again, whacko pointing gun as an avatar is surprised the darkies want to carry them, too.

I have no problem with anybody carrying a firearm legally. I do have a problem with hoods carrying them while selling dope. The point is that much of his family are criminals and problems. Yet the geniuses keep voting the guy in over and over again.

You don't think there would have been a liability if they got hit on the street?

Mind you, the best thing they could do to Cleveland would be to bulldoze the whole thing and start over.

Well Joe, it's like I've always said. What makes the neighborhood are the neighbors. You can bulldoze anything you like, but if the same lowlifes continue to live there, you end up with the same results.

We had a quadruple murder last month. It happened ten houses from where I grew up until the age of 7. Back then, it was the safest neighborhood anybody could imagine. We lived upstairs in a double home owned by my grandparents, and they lived downstairs. A lot of people didn't have AC back then, so my grandparents would leave the front door open in the summer and place a fan in front of the screen door. Never a problem. People used to take walks at night, never a problem. Today, you'd be nuts to live there without a gun.

Unless the city of Cleveland would permit kids with dirt bikes to ride the street, no, they are not liable for accidents and deaths.

 

[Rustic]

24 mutants waiting for the lunch bell to ring... they'd have said Tamir was riding a magic uniform if that meant McGinty would have let them out earlier.

Here's the problem. McGinty went into that grand jury with the intent to exonerate Officer Crybaby... This was like the EXACT OPPOSITE OF HIS JOB AS A PROSECUTOR.

You have no idea what he did or said in that hearing. It was pretty closed up. As always, you are making assumptions and convincing yourself it is truth.

Again, whacko pointing gun as an avatar is surprised the darkies want to carry them, too.

I have no problem with anybody carrying a firearm legally. I do have a problem with hoods carrying them while selling dope. The point is that much of his family are criminals and problems. Yet the geniuses keep voting the guy in over and over again.

You don't think there would have been a liability if they got hit on the street?

Mind you, the best thing they could do to Cleveland would be to bulldoze the whole thing and start over.

Well Joe, it's like I've always said. What makes the neighborhood are the neighbors. You can bulldoze anything you like, but if the same lowlifes continue to live there, you end up with the same results.

We had a quadruple murder last month. It happened ten houses from where I grew up until the age of 7. Back then, it was the safest neighborhood anybody could imagine. We lived upstairs in a double home owned by my grandparents, and they lived downstairs. A lot of people didn't have AC back then, so my grandparents would leave the front door open in the summer and place a fan in front of the screen door. Never a problem. People used to take walks at night, never a problem. Today, you'd be nuts to live there without a gun.

Unless the city of Cleveland would permit kids with dirt bikes to ride the street, no, they are not liable for accidents and deaths.

Lol
Don’t mind joe, he sits in his mother’s basement and plays internet tough guy, and watches Michael Jackson videos...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And the ones where Trump lowered their taxes and removed regulations were not?

Put 100 people in a room and ask them if they have gained anything at all with scum bags tax cut for the rich and they will just laugh at you. Regulations are there to protect us, not from the slime of big government but protect us from the slime of big business , These regulation cutting ding dong's on the right are here trying to convince us that big business can be trusted to take care of us , These people want a nanny state having big business take care of us. Ya sure they can be trusted, I trust government 100 times over big business, simply because of the influence of money profits in big business. Without regulations they would eat our children for their bottom line.

Those tax cuts and regulation removals are responsible for the economy we have today. Lowest unemployment in nearly 50 years, and at this pace, we are likely to beat that record as well. Consumer confidence at it's highest level. Small business confidence at record levels since polling started. Lowest unemployment for minorities since records were kept. Household income hitting a new high along with the constant stock market records.

Unless somebody is totally ignorant of tax filings, most people would say tax cuts have worked for them, especially if they filed their 2018 returns. Next year the Commie Care fine will be removed, and there will be even more of a savings for POOR AND MIDDLE-CLASS families.

Most people benefited from rich to poor with Trump's tax policies. Get with the program.

Unless you can show me ,with a chart, that shows that anything changed as far as the rate of increase in any aspects of our economy from Obama's presidency till now , then this is still Obama's economy , every chart representing all aspects of our economy show either a slowdown when scum bag came into office or staying flat , holding the same rate on increase as Obamas years in office, You can't do this because there isn't any chart that shows that scum bag contributed in any way to our economy , To repeat myself for the hundredth time , it is only Scum bags economy if he did anything at all to help in any way across the board any aspect of our economy , hell this isn't rocket science .

It must be rocket science to you because you still can't figure it out.

How much lower can unemployment get than the lowest in 49 years? When was the last time in our country when we had several million more jobs than people to fill them?

Ya lets take a look at facts, What does this chart show , It shows that your party is totally at fault for the large unemployment in the first place, because of Bush the baby killers presidency. Then It show a brilliant piece of work by Obama to fix that problem and it shows that when Trotsky Trump came into office the rate of decline slowed To the point that we would have done better if Trotsky wasn't in office at all and in fact if nobody was in office through those year of The Trotsky dynasty. So Comrade Your remark is as always , just dumb.View attachment 274941

When it comes to dumb, nobody can beat your remark. You happen to think that just because somebody is sitting in the White House, they are credited or to be blamed for all that's happening. So one more time:

DumBama did absolutely nothing for the economy. Anything he did with respect to businesses was a negative. You can't take credit for an economy you fought against. The Federal Reserve is more responsible by dumping trillions of dollars into the stock market. This is something DumBama had no control over.

In 2014, fuel prices began to plummet. This was the result of fracking which is mostly done on private land, and out of control of the federal government. Again, nothing to do with DumBama as he and the Democrats always stood against fracking. They promoted solar panels, windmills, electric cars and so on; renewable energy which was always more expensive. And speaking of businesses and jobs, coal mines across the country also closed down thanks to Democrats.

When prices dropped, people across the board had new money in which to spend; some finding hundreds of new dollars a month between their natural gas and gasoline bills. The larger home you owned and the further you had to drive to work, the more money you saved.

Not only did that help the economy greatly during DumBama's time in office, but Trump as well. However Trump never gave up, and we are now enjoying a 3.7% unemployment rate. The US record for the lowest unemployment was in the mid 50's at 2.5%. That means we are only 1.2% from the lowest unemployment rate in history thanks to Donald Trump. Furthermore is we have millions of jobs more than Americans to do them.

What did DumBama say about those jobs before Trump created them? This:

Obama said Trump didn't have a magic wand for Jobs. Looks like he was wrong! 4.1% GDP

 

[rjs330]

Those tax cuts and regulation removals are responsible for the economy we have today. Lowest unemployment in nearly 50 years, and at this pace, we are likely to beat that record as well. Consumer confidence at it's highest level. Small business confidence at record levels since polling started. Lowest unemployment for minorities since records were kept. Household income hitting a new high along with the constant stock market records.

Unless somebody is totally ignorant of tax filings, most people would say tax cuts have worked for them, especially if they filed their 2018 returns. Next year the Commie Care fine will be removed, and there will be even more of a savings for POOR AND MIDDLE-CLASS families.

Most people benefited from rich to poor with Trump's tax policies. Get with the program.

nonsense , I challenge you to bring any economical chart from the beginning of Obama's Presidency through the 3 years of scum bag, the magic turd time in office and show us scum bags massive influence on our economy , you can't because the charts ether slow down the rate of increase over Obama or are the same. He has done nothing other then lies that micro minds are controlled by.
You can't show me on any chart how something he has done has effected Obama's Market. Literally if no one was in office it would be the same or better. Your the type of commie boot licker who I can't get any more then the first sentence of your comment out and I always have to stop their because it is such bullshit. Sometimes not even a full sentence,

Commie boot lickers? Tell me, who did the US Communist Party endorse in the Hillary election? How about the Obama election? How about Sanders?

If you look at the US Communist Party manifesto, you would see very few differences between their platform and the Democrat platform. What you would also note is their utter disdain for President Bush, President Trump, and even President Reagan.

You can't name me one policy of DumBama that was responsible for the economic turn around. If you can, tell me, which one was it? Increasing business taxes? Increasing their regulations? Burdening them with Commie Care? What?????

DumBama was the most anti-business President of our lifetime. He has regulated many businesses out of existence. It's why we had the slowest post recession growth during his time in office. He was not responsible for that. The Federal reserve was with Quantitive Easing. Businesses (taking advantage of that) were also responsible.

Funny and who in the election did the Nazi party the KKK and the white supremacist endorse. The market is always sensitive to who's elected as president and know from the facts that electing a democrat is a major plus for them as investors and a total complete disaster over time electing a right winger as president. This isn't complicated, simply look at what happened literally the day Obama's was put into office.The market reversed course and flew to where it is now and now is still Obama's economy. There is no chart from the beginning of Obama's presidency till now that you can find that shows anything other then the fact that you can't see any increase in the rate of increase but does in a few charts shows a slow down when scum bag was elected. You surely can't win this argument because other then lies and distortion you have no response.
The idiots from the right that are pointing at the democrats being Socialist and communist are just straight out stupid. There is a definition of socialism and communism and there is no major tenet of them that would suggest any way that there is any communists or socialist governing any where in this country. Simple proof, there is one tenet that has to exist for theere to be either communism or socialism and that is that the means of production is owned and run by government and the sales of their products is also charged to the government. There is none of that anywhere in this country nor is their anyone on the left that is promoting it, Your party charge of us being communist or socialist is straight out stupid with a capital S.

Really? So explain how an admitted Socialist is running for the second time as the nominee for the Democrat party. Explain how the most popular Congresswoman on the left is also an admitted Socialist.

Of course they don't have the power to rule anything yet. There are not enough of them in the party. But as time progresses, so does the Democrat party. They are stepping over Socialism right into Communism.

As for Trump supporters, of course they are behind him in only one regards, and that is his tough stance on border control. Most of the immigrants are coming from the south, not Europe.

The true Nazi's are actually the Democrats in every other way. They spent nearly three years trying to overturn a fair election. Democrats feel they own this country, and anybody against their power is a threat to the state. Piglosi and the Democrats just issued a warning to the Supreme Court about their ruling on cases. A threat to the Supreme Court? This is what I'm talking about. They don't respect who the people chose, and they certainly don't respect their choices for the courts. Sorry, but we live in an elective Republic, and that's how we do things.

You can't change the fact that the Nazi Party in the US backs Trump. They have NEVER backed either the Democratic nor the Republican party. But they do back the party of Trump. Why is that? Now, you can lie out your ass like you are doing now. Or you can try and spin history where you claim the old Nazis were Socialists when in fact they were right wing fascists. Well, here is Merrian Webster's definition, not the bastarized BS you keep claiming. You will see that if Trump were left unchecked this is exactly where things would lead.

Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality

BTW, Mussolini and his government fit that same definition as did Hitler and his nazi government. Fascism fights to defeat liberal Democracy as well as any form of Socialism. It uses unfettered Capitalism to get and keep it's power. But you keep rewriting history and lying out your ass. You keep covering for your Fuehrer. You keep disregarding the damage that's being done in this extremely important time in history. But when your Fuehrer is done and the Republican Party rebuilds (should take it about 10 years) the damage that an unchecked Democratic Party and it's leftist ways without moderation will be on your butt. I probably won't be alive to see it but my Grand Kids will be. But they are going to have to pay off the debt as will their Grand Children.

So? Just cause the Nazi party backed Trump doesnt mean Trump.backs or supports the Nazi party. Any more than if the communist party supports a Democrat means the Democrats support the communist. Who by the way, killed more people than the Nazis ever did.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

nonsense , I challenge you to bring any economical chart from the beginning of Obama's Presidency through the 3 years of scum bag, the magic turd time in office and show us scum bags massive influence on our economy , you can't because the charts ether slow down the rate of increase over Obama or are the same. He has done nothing other then lies that micro minds are controlled by.
You can't show me on any chart how something he has done has effected Obama's Market. Literally if no one was in office it would be the same or better. Your the type of commie boot licker who I can't get any more then the first sentence of your comment out and I always have to stop their because it is such bullshit. Sometimes not even a full sentence,

Commie boot lickers? Tell me, who did the US Communist Party endorse in the Hillary election? How about the Obama election? How about Sanders?

If you look at the US Communist Party manifesto, you would see very few differences between their platform and the Democrat platform. What you would also note is their utter disdain for President Bush, President Trump, and even President Reagan.

You can't name me one policy of DumBama that was responsible for the economic turn around. If you can, tell me, which one was it? Increasing business taxes? Increasing their regulations? Burdening them with Commie Care? What?????

DumBama was the most anti-business President of our lifetime. He has regulated many businesses out of existence. It's why we had the slowest post recession growth during his time in office. He was not responsible for that. The Federal reserve was with Quantitive Easing. Businesses (taking advantage of that) were also responsible.

Funny and who in the election did the Nazi party the KKK and the white supremacist endorse. The market is always sensitive to who's elected as president and know from the facts that electing a democrat is a major plus for them as investors and a total complete disaster over time electing a right winger as president. This isn't complicated, simply look at what happened literally the day Obama's was put into office.The market reversed course and flew to where it is now and now is still Obama's economy. There is no chart from the beginning of Obama's presidency till now that you can find that shows anything other then the fact that you can't see any increase in the rate of increase but does in a few charts shows a slow down when scum bag was elected. You surely can't win this argument because other then lies and distortion you have no response.
The idiots from the right that are pointing at the democrats being Socialist and communist are just straight out stupid. There is a definition of socialism and communism and there is no major tenet of them that would suggest any way that there is any communists or socialist governing any where in this country. Simple proof, there is one tenet that has to exist for theere to be either communism or socialism and that is that the means of production is owned and run by government and the sales of their products is also charged to the government. There is none of that anywhere in this country nor is their anyone on the left that is promoting it, Your party charge of us being communist or socialist is straight out stupid with a capital S.

Really? So explain how an admitted Socialist is running for the second time as the nominee for the Democrat party. Explain how the most popular Congresswoman on the left is also an admitted Socialist.

Of course they don't have the power to rule anything yet. There are not enough of them in the party. But as time progresses, so does the Democrat party. They are stepping over Socialism right into Communism.

As for Trump supporters, of course they are behind him in only one regards, and that is his tough stance on border control. Most of the immigrants are coming from the south, not Europe.

The true Nazi's are actually the Democrats in every other way. They spent nearly three years trying to overturn a fair election. Democrats feel they own this country, and anybody against their power is a threat to the state. Piglosi and the Democrats just issued a warning to the Supreme Court about their ruling on cases. A threat to the Supreme Court? This is what I'm talking about. They don't respect who the people chose, and they certainly don't respect their choices for the courts. Sorry, but we live in an elective Republic, and that's how we do things.

You can't change the fact that the Nazi Party in the US backs Trump. They have NEVER backed either the Democratic nor the Republican party. But they do back the party of Trump. Why is that? Now, you can lie out your ass like you are doing now. Or you can try and spin history where you claim the old Nazis were Socialists when in fact they were right wing fascists. Well, here is Merrian Webster's definition, not the bastarized BS you keep claiming. You will see that if Trump were left unchecked this is exactly where things would lead.

Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control early instances of army fascism and brutality

BTW, Mussolini and his government fit that same definition as did Hitler and his nazi government. Fascism fights to defeat liberal Democracy as well as any form of Socialism. It uses unfettered Capitalism to get and keep it's power. But you keep rewriting history and lying out your ass. You keep covering for your Fuehrer. You keep disregarding the damage that's being done in this extremely important time in history. But when your Fuehrer is done and the Republican Party rebuilds (should take it about 10 years) the damage that an unchecked Democratic Party and it's leftist ways without moderation will be on your butt. I probably won't be alive to see it but my Grand Kids will be. But they are going to have to pay off the debt as will their Grand Children.

So? Just cause the Nazi party backed Trump doesnt mean Trump.backs or supports the Nazi party. Any more than if the communist party supports a Democrat means the Democrats support the communist. Who by the way, killed more people than the Nazis ever did.

Putin, the Commie, backs Trump. So does that mean Trump is both Commie and Nazi? Or is that just the voices in his head.

 

[busybee01]

Ohhhhhh shittttt Well lookie lookie...

The Ohio gunman described himself on social media as a pro-Satan “leftist” who wanted Joe Biden’s generation to die off, hated President Trump and law enforcement, and hoped to vote for Sen. Elizabeth Warren for president.

To be fair righties kill a lot more, they are also encouraged by the presidents rethoric.

You mean like the Ohio killer was not affected by talk of putting kids in cages, calling detention centers concentration camps,, and telling the public they make people drink out of toilets?

You noticed I said righties do it more ? FBI director appointed by trump recognizes the rise of hate crimes from white nationalists...debunk it with alt facts? Or you are a sympathizer ?

So where is this white nationalist organization at? How do we identify them? Do they wear uniforms or something?

White nationalism is a made up term by the left. Kooks are not part of any organization, they are simply kooks that kill people in large numbers just like what happened under Hussein.

During this weekend, one was a paranoid white guy who felt threatened by minorities. The other was a Satin worshiper that loves Elizabeth Warren. Neither were part of any organization. Again, just kooks. But for us on the right to assign blame to Warren is just as stupid as those on the left placing blame on Trump. In fact with the guy in El Paso, his other issues were more left than right.

White nationalists have no organization which is what makes them so deadly. They are lone wolves for the most part however they are aware of what others do. The El Paso shooter cited the New Zealand shooter wo attacked mosques.

White nationalism is not made up. The El Paso shooter was a white nationalist. He was not a kook. He went all the way to El Paso to kill Hispanics.

"Main gun: AK46 (WASR 10) – I realized pretty quickly that this isn’t a great choice since it’s the civilian version of the ak47. It’s not designed to shoot rounds quickly, so it overheats massively after about 100 shots fired in quick succession. I’ll have to use a heat-resistant glove to get around this.

8m3 bullet: The bullet, unlike pretty much any other 7.62×39 bullet, actually fragments like a pistol hollow point when shot out of an ak47 at the cost of penetration. Penetration is still reasonable, but not nearly as a normal ak47 bullet. The ak47 is definitely a bad choice without this bullet design, and may still be with it.

The other gun(if I get one): the ar15 – Pretty much any variation of this gun doesn’t heat up nearly as fast as the AK47. The round of this gun isn’t designed to fragment, but instead tumbles inside a target causing lethal wounding. This gun is probably better, but I wanted to explore different options. The ar15 is probably the best gun for military applications but this isn’t a military application.

This will be a test of which is more lethal, either it’s fragmentation or tumbling.

I didn’t spend much time preparing for this attack. Maybe a month, probably less. I have to do this before I lose my nerve. I figured that an under-prepared attack and a meh manifesto is better than no attack and no manifesto."

This is not the ramblings of a madman. This is someone who thought this out carefully. Very few mass shootings are done by kooks.

Trump is partially to blame as he has encouraged hostility towards Hispanics by using terms such as invasion, invader, animals, rapists and murderers. Please name the talking points that Warren used to make the Dayton shooter violent. For the El Paso shooter, immigration was is number 1 issue and that is why he went to El Paso.

 

[ScorpioRising007]

For the last several days all we've heard is "racist white shooter." - "This Trump's fault!"
Leftist lies, talking points that they got together with their Media whores to create that narrative..

Ohio gunman described himself as pro-Satan ‘leftist’ who supported Elizabeth Warren

This LEFTIST freak was a pathetic Lizzy Fakeass Indian supporter..

You Commies ALWAYS overplay your hand..

So he was a Satanist who happened to be a democrat and more toward the left. I have known plenty of Satanists who were republicans too and loved Trump, your point? You know most of those young kids in their rebellious stage of life who go to those Satanists clubs have no criminal records and are law abiding citizens. They do that for a few months or a few years till they mature and grow out of it, some start going to a protestant or Catholic church after they have matured a bit. Radical Islam is like 100x more dangerous then some rebellious young kids practicing Satanism to be honest.