Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Always funny when the left tries to do what they preach against.It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Judge? What about the people who sued to change the Constitutional direction for the EC you so stridently defend when it opposes the popular vote? You see no irony there? Of course not!Always funny when the left tries to do what they preach against.It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Irony here is when the gop candidate could gain the left can always find a left leaning judge..
Lol. My great-grandkids can get 'cuter' than that!Sorry...but I didn't get passed "ok I need help..."
Because I know that already and I really dislike redundancy.
No, each state electors do not HAVE to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in the State....It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
I sure hope your great grand kids are cuter than me.Lol. My great-grandkids can get 'cuter' than that!Sorry...but I didn't get passed "ok I need help..."
Because I know that already and I really dislike redundancy.
Thank you, care. I needed that. I never knew the original intent.No, each state electors do not HAVE to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in the State....It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Only 28 states have written laws to STOP the electors from choosing the President...
the other State electors are unbound....at least as far as penalties the states have issued like a fine if they vote for someone other than what their State dictates.
My State of Maine, and Nebraska, have our electors set up as the FOUNDERS intended and also as electors were for our Nation in the first 4 Presidential elections...
Each elector given to each state for each congressmen that they have, vote in the manner that supports their own congressional district...states get 1 elector for each congressional voting district, and all states get 2 electors, representing their 2 Senators which is what gives the small states more power and favors the small states, because a small state has the exact same power as the large state who also only gets 2 electors to represent their senators.
Basically, the problem with the electoral college now, BECAUSE States have manipulated it and changed it from our founders day and intent, have set up WINNER TAKES ALL electors, and THAT is what is WRONG.....electors should vote individually...if the district they represent voted for Hillary, then their vote should go to Hillary, if the district the elector represents voted for Donald Trump, then their vote goes to Donald, THEN whomever won the State's Popular vote, gets the vote of the 2 extra electors the State gets to represent their Senators.
this way, voters in the election won't feel shafted and disenfranchised...it's also how democrats do their delegates in the Primary, winner does not take all delegates, each candidate gets the delegates they won, proportionally in the citizen vote.
Anyway, I want the electoral college, they just should go back to each elector voting for who their citizens wanted...
In my state of Maine, we have 2 congressional voting districts....yes, we are a low populated state...
one district's popular vote went to Trump, and the other district's popular vote went to Clinton.
So clinton got one elector, and Trump got one elector,
Clinton won the popular vote overall in the State
So she got the 2 extra electors representing two US senators
-----------------------------------------
Now, back to this in Colorado
electors are suppose to vote for who they feel and think and know, would be the best President for the NATION...the popular vote is suppose help the electors in their choice, but ultimately, when the electors vote on the 19th, the founders wanted them to be able to vote, individually, their conscience.
When will you thank me for informing you of the truth, every stinking day?Thank you, care. I needed that. I never knew the original intent.No, each state electors do not HAVE to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in the State....It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Only 28 states have written laws to STOP the electors from choosing the President...
the other State electors are unbound....at least as far as penalties the states have issued like a fine if they vote for someone other than what their State dictates.
My State of Maine, and Nebraska, have our electors set up as the FOUNDERS intended and also as electors were for our Nation in the first 4 Presidential elections...
Each elector given to each state for each congressmen that they have, vote in the manner that supports their own congressional district...states get 1 elector for each congressional voting district, and all states get 2 electors, representing their 2 Senators which is what gives the small states more power and favors the small states, because a small state has the exact same power as the large state who also only gets 2 electors to represent their senators.
Basically, the problem with the electoral college now, BECAUSE States have manipulated it and changed it from our founders day and intent, have set up WINNER TAKES ALL electors, and THAT is what is WRONG.....electors should vote individually...if the district they represent voted for Hillary, then their vote should go to Hillary, if the district the elector represents voted for Donald Trump, then their vote goes to Donald, THEN whomever won the State's Popular vote, gets the vote of the 2 extra electors the State gets to represent their Senators.
this way, voters in the election won't feel shafted and disenfranchised...it's also how democrats do their delegates in the Primary, winner does not take all delegates, each candidate gets the delegates they won, proportionally in the citizen vote.
Anyway, I want the electoral college, they just should go back to each elector voting for who their citizens wanted...
In my state of Maine, we have 2 congressional voting districts....yes, we are a low populated state...
one district's popular vote went to Trump, and the other district's popular vote went to Clinton.
So clinton got one elector, and Trump got one elector,
Clinton won the popular vote overall in the State
So she got the 2 extra electors representing two US senators
-----------------------------------------
Now, back to this in Colorado
electors are suppose to vote for who they feel and think and know, would be the best President for the NATION...the popular vote is suppose help the electors in their choice, but ultimately, when the electors vote on the 19th, the founders wanted them to be able to vote, individually, their conscience.
Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
My friend, when you actually come up with some truth, I'll thank you...every stinking time.When will you thank me for informing you of the truth, every stinking day?Thank you, care. I needed that. I never knew the original intent.No, each state electors do not HAVE to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in the State....It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Only 28 states have written laws to STOP the electors from choosing the President...
the other State electors are unbound....at least as far as penalties the states have issued like a fine if they vote for someone other than what their State dictates.
My State of Maine, and Nebraska, have our electors set up as the FOUNDERS intended and also as electors were for our Nation in the first 4 Presidential elections...
Each elector given to each state for each congressmen that they have, vote in the manner that supports their own congressional district...states get 1 elector for each congressional voting district, and all states get 2 electors, representing their 2 Senators which is what gives the small states more power and favors the small states, because a small state has the exact same power as the large state who also only gets 2 electors to represent their senators.
Basically, the problem with the electoral college now, BECAUSE States have manipulated it and changed it from our founders day and intent, have set up WINNER TAKES ALL electors, and THAT is what is WRONG.....electors should vote individually...if the district they represent voted for Hillary, then their vote should go to Hillary, if the district the elector represents voted for Donald Trump, then their vote goes to Donald, THEN whomever won the State's Popular vote, gets the vote of the 2 extra electors the State gets to represent their Senators.
this way, voters in the election won't feel shafted and disenfranchised...it's also how democrats do their delegates in the Primary, winner does not take all delegates, each candidate gets the delegates they won, proportionally in the citizen vote.
Anyway, I want the electoral college, they just should go back to each elector voting for who their citizens wanted...
In my state of Maine, we have 2 congressional voting districts....yes, we are a low populated state...
one district's popular vote went to Trump, and the other district's popular vote went to Clinton.
So clinton got one elector, and Trump got one elector,
Clinton won the popular vote overall in the State
So she got the 2 extra electors representing two US senators
-----------------------------------------
Now, back to this in Colorado
electors are suppose to vote for who they feel and think and know, would be the best President for the NATION...the popular vote is suppose help the electors in their choice, but ultimately, when the electors vote on the 19th, the founders wanted them to be able to vote, individually, their conscience.
Apparently you didn't know that Cankles supported Jill's recount effort.Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
Why do you leftards call the facts a RANT when you're exposed?Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
Where is my thank you???????Apparently you didn't know that Cankles supported Jill's recount effort.Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
Get informed before posting...PLEASE.
Hillary Clinton’s Team to Join Wisconsin Recount Pushed by Jill Stein
By DAVID E. SANGERNOV. 26, 2016
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
My friend, when you actually come up with some truth, I'll thank you...every stinking time.When will you thank me for informing you of the truth, every stinking day?Thank you, care. I needed that. I never knew the original intent.No, each state electors do not HAVE to vote for the candidate that won the popular vote in the State....It's back to the drawing board for me! I thought each State's Electoral College HAD to vote according to the State's popular vote. Now I see some are suing to change the process. I guess I need a primer reset on the EC all over again.
Judge orders Colorado electors to vote for Hillary Clinton
Only 28 states have written laws to STOP the electors from choosing the President...
the other State electors are unbound....at least as far as penalties the states have issued like a fine if they vote for someone other than what their State dictates.
My State of Maine, and Nebraska, have our electors set up as the FOUNDERS intended and also as electors were for our Nation in the first 4 Presidential elections...
Each elector given to each state for each congressmen that they have, vote in the manner that supports their own congressional district...states get 1 elector for each congressional voting district, and all states get 2 electors, representing their 2 Senators which is what gives the small states more power and favors the small states, because a small state has the exact same power as the large state who also only gets 2 electors to represent their senators.
Basically, the problem with the electoral college now, BECAUSE States have manipulated it and changed it from our founders day and intent, have set up WINNER TAKES ALL electors, and THAT is what is WRONG.....electors should vote individually...if the district they represent voted for Hillary, then their vote should go to Hillary, if the district the elector represents voted for Donald Trump, then their vote goes to Donald, THEN whomever won the State's Popular vote, gets the vote of the 2 extra electors the State gets to represent their Senators.
this way, voters in the election won't feel shafted and disenfranchised...it's also how democrats do their delegates in the Primary, winner does not take all delegates, each candidate gets the delegates they won, proportionally in the citizen vote.
Anyway, I want the electoral college, they just should go back to each elector voting for who their citizens wanted...
In my state of Maine, we have 2 congressional voting districts....yes, we are a low populated state...
one district's popular vote went to Trump, and the other district's popular vote went to Clinton.
So clinton got one elector, and Trump got one elector,
Clinton won the popular vote overall in the State
So she got the 2 extra electors representing two US senators
-----------------------------------------
Now, back to this in Colorado
electors are suppose to vote for who they feel and think and know, would be the best President for the NATION...the popular vote is suppose help the electors in their choice, but ultimately, when the electors vote on the 19th, the founders wanted them to be able to vote, individually, their conscience.
Gipper, FYI I have been against the recount from the gitgo. I do believe we should take another look at the EC, as care4all has suggested, for more clarity on the process and how to handle the popular vote, since the popular vote has lost the office twice in this century. But not post-election. This election is done, over, ended, final. The Clinton team that joined the recount expects no changes either, but the data could be of use in future clarification. The team has accepted the results as they now stand.Apparently you didn't know that Cankles supported Jill's recount effort.Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
Get informed before posting...PLEASE.
Hillary Clinton’s Team to Join Wisconsin Recount Pushed by Jill Stein
By DAVID E. SANGERNOV. 26, 2016
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
Thank you, gipper!Where is my thank you???????Apparently you didn't know that Cankles supported Jill's recount effort.Why did you have to turn a sincere question into a RW rant? Hillary conceded on election night, Stein started the recounts and you just gotta keep turning 1/2 this country into demons to make yourself look good. What is so lacking in your life that you have to do this?I remember Hitlery saying she was "HORRIFIED" that Trump wouldn't unconditionally accept the election results if "SHE" won.
Now look at the dems. The hypocrisy is mind numbing. They are truly, the SHIT PILE of America.
Get informed before posting...PLEASE.
Hillary Clinton’s Team to Join Wisconsin Recount Pushed by Jill Stein
By DAVID E. SANGERNOV. 26, 2016
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
