Okay liberals want more gun control. This is a start.

[jknowgood]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

Obviously you’re unaware of how comprehensively ignorant and ridiculous this is.

An embryo/fetus is not a ‘baby,’ abortion is not ‘murder,’ and a woman exercising her right to privacy is not justification to deny her her other rights.

Americans can’t be compelled to ‘choose’ which right the state will violate and which right the state will respect; the notion is moronic idiocy.

 

[jknowgood]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

Obviously you’re unaware of how comprehensively ignorant and ridiculous this is.

An embryo/fetus is not a ‘baby,’ abortion is not ‘murder,’ and a woman exercising her right to privacy is not justification to deny her her other rights.

Americans can’t be compelled to ‘choose’ which right the state will violate and which right the state will respect; the notion is moronic idiocy.

So, your wanting her to have the right for the second amendment? So now your for gun owners?

 

[whitehall]

Call for the indictment of the A.G. and most of the ATF who were involved in the Mex gun running fiasco and the deaths of hundreds of innocent Mexican civilians and a Border Patrol Officer and then we will talk.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

That is a great beginning!

To get more firearms away from private citizens, I would ask that ALL gun control advocates surrender ALL of their firearms, plus ANYTHING that could be misconstrued as being a firearm.

The liberals should try a new tactic that they have NEVER tried before: LEADING BY EXAMPLE.

 

[hazlnut]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

I can live with that as long as we add Creationists and NASCAR fans to the banned from owning guns list.

 

[Politico]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

Obviously you’re unaware of how comprehensively ignorant and ridiculous this is.

An embryo/fetus is not a ‘baby,’ abortion is not ‘murder,’ and a woman exercising her right to privacy is not justification to deny her her other rights.

Americans can’t be compelled to ‘choose’ which right the state will violate and which right the state will respect; the notion is moronic idiocy.

So, your wanting her to have the right for the second amendment? So now your for gun owners?

No he was just pointing out how stupid the point was.

 

[skookerasbil]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

I can live with that as long as we add Creationists and NASCAR fans to the banned from owning guns list.

fAiL asshole!!!!


Gallup Poll: Support for gun control is waning, opposition to handgun ban at all-time high


Oh....how are all those progressive gun laws working out in Shitcago??! City is a snakepit!!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

Obviously you’re unaware of how comprehensively ignorant and ridiculous this is.

An embryo/fetus is not a ‘baby,’ abortion is not ‘murder,’ and a woman exercising her right to privacy is not justification to deny her her other rights.

Americans can’t be compelled to ‘choose’ which right the state will violate and which right the state will respect; the notion is moronic idiocy.

You can call it whatever you want the fact is it is a human life and ending that life is murder. Plain and simple.

 

[martybegan]

Let's start with women that get an abortion. If you have an abortion, you give up your right to own a gun. If you can kill your own baby, maybe your not okay to have a gun. That law alone would prevent millions of new gun owners. They still get to choose, so there is no war on women. Also they can choose to be a gun owner. Either way it will save children's lives!

Obviously you’re unaware of how comprehensively ignorant and ridiculous this is.

An embryo/fetus is not a ‘baby,’ abortion is not ‘murder,’ and a woman exercising her right to privacy is not justification to deny her her other rights.

Americans can’t be compelled to ‘choose’ which right the state will violate and which right the state will respect; the notion is moronic idiocy.

Just can't admit that something is dying, can ya?

 

[M14 Shooter]

The OP makes the wrong connection between the right to arms and the right to an abortion.
You have the right to take a human life in self-defense, not convenience.

 

[jknowgood]

The OP makes the wrong connection between the right to arms and the right to an abortion.
You have the right to take a human life in self-defense, not convenience.

I was trying to make a point that if a mother was okay killing her own child, then a human life couldn't mean that much to her, so maybe she shouldn't have a gun.