Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
Ahh and the singularity angle rears its head again.
We aren't talking about what normalizing a grotesque and disfiguring manifestation of deep mental issues will do to just one person here or there. We are talking about what society's stamp of approval as a WHOLE on the practice means to the next few generations and where that will lead all of us.
I for one do not want to see a serious mental condition be called, held out and represented to youngsters en masse, as "normal, healthy, OK". I'm not keen to see stark mental illness become "normal" in any human society. That's how barbaric practices take root and overtake a society. Check your history books for examples.
Genetics, and Genitals, do not make Gender. The organ that works that out is the real sex organ, the brain. The body just moves it around.again, are you this upset bout plastic surgery, boob jobs, hair transplants or a lot of other things people do to themselves to not be what nature made them?
Or do you only get upset when people do surgical things to their junk?
Plastic surgery doesn't change ones gender. One's gender is determined by DNA, the presence or absence of a womb or penis & testicles at birth. The other stuff is enhancement. And for the record, no, I don't approve of vanity unless there is horrible disfiguring like a cleft palate or burn scars...things of that nature.
I am absolutely against amputation of healthy organs and the rendering thereby of a person as sexually numb and with urinary incontinence all in an assist to their delusions that they aren't what gender they were born as. Mental issues aren't solved by amputating healthy organs.
Your concerns, like your knowledge of this, are invalid.
Just one assisted mutilation of a person's healthy body parts is a crime. No psychaitrist with a hair of ethical reproach would EVER clear a person to amputate healthy body parts in order to role-play their delusion that they are the gender they aren't. Any person so doing should have their license to practice revoked and should serve jail time.Guy, get a grip. First of all, they don't approve sex-reassignment surgery after there has been a thorough evaluation by a psychiatrist.
second, only about 250 of these operations are performed in the US per year. It's not like it's an epidemic.
In this case it's my educated mind that has been following such things for 40 years now. Educated yourself.Genetics, and Genitals, do not make Gender. The organ that works that out is the real sex organ, the brain. The body just moves it around.Plastic surgery doesn't change ones gender. One's gender is determined by DNA, the presence or absence of a womb or penis & testicles at birth. The other stuff is enhancement. And for the record, no, I don't approve of vanity unless there is horrible disfiguring like a cleft palate or burn scars...things of that nature.
I am absolutely against amputation of healthy organs and the rendering thereby of a person as sexually numb and with urinary incontinence all in an assist to their delusions that they aren't what gender they were born as. Mental issues aren't solved by amputating healthy organs.
Your concerns, like your knowledge of this, are invalid.
Where are your sources?
[
Just one assisted mutilation of a person's healthy body parts is a crime. No psychaitrist with a hair of ethical reproach would EVER clear a person to amputate healthy body parts in order to role-play their delusion that they are the gender they aren't. Any person so doing should have their license to practice revoked and should serve jail time.Guy, get a grip. First of all, they don't approve sex-reassignment surgery after there has been a thorough evaluation by a psychiatrist.
second, only about 250 of these operations are performed in the US per year. It's not like it's an epidemic.
(1) Marriage equality for who and "what" have been answered over and over, so you don't "get just once more." (2) The same applies to LBGT, other than to suggest that heterosexuality is not associated with "deviant" behavior is a foolish assumption. (3) The issue of polygamy is not part of the scope of this discussion. (4) I have not said that I think that "this Court is going to saddle Utah with polygamy as a matter of law"; you have. (5) I am ever optimistic about the American experiment.Marriage equality for who exactly? What is "LGBT" and why is it limited only to these ways of deviant behaviors? What about polygamy? Is "two" a sacred word of marriage that must be preserved while all other traditional US parameters to the definition are fair game to dissolve? Why? Why the arrangement of adults and not the number? And so on. Good luck! You think this Court is going to saddle Utah with polygamy as a matter of law. My, you are optimistic
[
Just one assisted mutilation of a person's healthy body parts is a crime. No psychaitrist with a hair of ethical reproach would EVER clear a person to amputate healthy body parts in order to role-play their delusion that they are the gender they aren't. Any person so doing should have their license to practice revoked and should serve jail time.Guy, get a grip. First of all, they don't approve sex-reassignment surgery after there has been a thorough evaluation by a psychiatrist.
second, only about 250 of these operations are performed in the US per year. It's not like it's an epidemic.
250 people get sex reassignment surgery a year.
400,000 women get breast augmentation surgery a year.
Guess which one Sil is upset about.
It's idiocy to get upset about either.[
Just one assisted mutilation of a person's healthy body parts is a crime. No psychaitrist with a hair of ethical reproach would EVER clear a person to amputate healthy body parts in order to role-play their delusion that they are the gender they aren't. Any person so doing should have their license to practice revoked and should serve jail time.
250 people get sex reassignment surgery a year.
400,000 women get breast augmentation surgery a year.
Guess which one Sil is upset about.
Both. Both are pursuits of mentally ill people trying to be some icon of some stereotype they fancy themselves but are not.
It's idiocy to get upset about either.250 people get sex reassignment surgery a year.
400,000 women get breast augmentation surgery a year.
Guess which one Sil is upset about.
Both. Both are pursuits of mentally ill people trying to be some icon of some stereotype they fancy themselves but are not.
It's idiocy to get upset about either.Both. Both are pursuits of mentally ill people trying to be some icon of some stereotype they fancy themselves but are not.
It is beyond idiocy and into the realm of crime to hold out to generations of impressionable youngsters that old mistakes have now become "healthy" with the passage of time..
It's idiocy to get upset about either.
It is beyond idiocy and into the realm of crime to hold out to generations of impressionable youngsters that old mistakes have now become "healthy" with the passage of time..
Sil, frome where does your cultural fascism develop?
Now this gets interesting...THE COLORADO INDEPENDENT
Tenth Circuit judges have what they need in gay-marriage cases
The hearings are over. A decision may come by June.
The plaintiffs, two longtime lesbian couples from Tulsa — Mary Bishop and Sharon Baldwin and Susan Barton and Gay Phillips — have sued Tulsa County Clerk Sally Smith. Jim Campbell, arguing on defense of Clerk Smith, said the couples have to find someone else to sue partly because Smith has no power to address their complaint. He said Smith can’t change the law and that no couples are looking to her to recognize their out-of-state marriages.
The judges — Jerome Holmes, Paul Kelly and Carlos Lucero — took turns peppering Campbell with questions.
“But don’t we need a concrete problem to consider?” asked Judge Kelly, suggesting that a clerk who issues marriage licenses and who in 2009 denied the plaintiffs a marriage license would be the right person to sue.
Campbell cited an earlier district court ruling that said the plaintiffs should look to target some other state official. Judge Holmes’ eyes grew wide.
“Why wouldn’t the clerk be the face of the judiciary for the purpose of the case?” he asked. “This is us. The Tenth Circuit made this decision. Shouldn’t our decision [telling the plaintiffs] to sue the clerk overtake any [lower] district court’s ruling?” ...
...When the couples originally filed their suit in 2004, weeks after Oklahomans voted for a state ban on gay marriage, they targeted the governor and the state attorney general. After years of legal back and forth, the case in 2009 came to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, where an earlier three-judge panel told them, in effect, they couldn’t sue the state executives, that the governor and the attorney general had only tangential jurisdiction on marriage. They had to sue a clerk...
...Court watchers expect the Tenth Circuit panel to issue a ruling on the Utah and Oklahoma cases this summer. The circuit hears cases from a conservative middle- and mountain-west region that includes, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming.
If the panel decides in favor of the plaintiffs and against gay-marriage bans, Colorado’s 2006 ban also would be invalidated. States attorneys in Colorado as well as in the rest of the states of the Tenth Circuit would likely appeal such a decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up a final legal showdown.
Tenth Circuit judges have what they need in gay-marriage cases | The Colorado Independent
The San Diego County Clerk, Ernest J. Dronenburg, Jr., has filed what is now the third lawsuit attempting to reinstate California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage. Apparently he will be joined by suits from 19 more of the 58 county clerks, who are asking the California Supreme Court to take a very narrow reading of the federal injunction against the measure left in place after the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June.
Dronenburg is represented by Chuck LiMandri of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, which is also defending ex-gay therapy in New Jersey. One of the claims made in the petition is that Dronenburg is personally injured by having to marry same-sex couples:
Petitioner is suffering, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury and damage unless this Court requires Respondents to execute their supervisory duties, which do not include control over county clerks issuing marriage licenses, consistent with state law limitations.
Petitioner is suffering, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury and damage unless this Court issues an immediate temporary stay during the pendency of these writ proceedings (1) that orders Respondents not to enforce the State Registrar’s directive commanding county clerks to issue marriage licenses contrary to state law defining marriage as the union between one man and one woman, and (2) that direct Petitioner to refrain from issuing marriage licenses contrary to state law defining marriage as the union between one man and one woman until this Court settles the important issues raised in this Petition. http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/...county-clerk-sues-to-reinstate-proposition-8/
I had a friend who died precisely because as a child, his liberty and freedom to not be assaulted by a same-gendered adult perp led to his liberty and freedom to be free of mental illness being compromised.
I had a friend who died precisely because as a child, his liberty and freedom to not be assaulted by a same-gendered adult perp led to his liberty and freedom to be free of mental illness being compromised.
Hope you go after the hetero abusers just as hard, because there are many more of them and they cause many more casualities.
Sil, is XX female and XY male, always?
