OffensivelyOpenMinded
Gold Member
- Apr 13, 2016
- 9,612
- 1,085
We have people that will troll the public in the worst way, Hutch. It's quite possible that picture is bullshit. Why was his wife telling him"Don't you do that!" ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You skipped where she was yelling at her husband to "don't do it" over and over.Wife to police:
Don't shoot him
He has no weapon
He didn't do anything
He doesn't have a gun. He has a TVI. He just took his medicine.
(to her husband) get out of the car. Don't let them break the window.
Get out of the car.
(four or five shoots fired)
Don't you do it.
Did you shoot him?
He better not be fucking dead.
Yep, he better live.
I'm not coming over there.
I'm video taping you.
He better not be dead
he better not be dead fuckers
did you call an ambulance?
He better not be dead
(officers said drop the gun 12 times
So far no evidence of gun
she told them he had a brain injury)
But get this. In the police picture, it looks like there is a gun on the ground. But in the family video, there is NO object that looks like a gun. No object at all. Nothing.
-----------------
This is going to be a trip.
That's my point.Do you have time stamped evidence to back your suspicion? If you do....show me it.
Dude, the entirety of the shooting and the immediate aftermath is on the video and there is nothing at his feet.
The photo has to be sometime after the video. Does it not?
The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.
View attachment 90800
Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott
We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.
A "throw down" gun would be far easier to add to a video.
I just watched it on FOX. Pretty crappy wife, looks like suicide by cop and Incan see why.Turn on your news station fool. Don't turn on Fox. I bet they won't show it.So where's the video?
First Obamaphones didn't exist, now they go back to the Wilson Administration.You're an idiot. I mean, you really really are stooopid. It was started as far back at President Wilson's administration. Why can't you RWNJ traitors ever learn?
Who knew?!
Watch the video idiot. The cops were crawling all over the place, all had their guns out, all just waiting and hoping for the chance to blow away a man who was just sitting him his car, minding his own business.
She can be clearly seen answering orders to stay away. There is little doubt they would have gunned her down too.
We need to make sure all blacks have video cameras.
Obamaphones help people deal drugs more efficiently thus helping the economy. Seriously, it's not like most these people are actually looking for jobs. Why would they? Free housing, food, phones, spending money and they can pimp, deal drugs and loot in their ample free time.Don't Obamaphones have cameras?Watch the video idiot. The cops were crawling all over the place, all had their guns out, all just waiting and hoping for the chance to blow away a man who was just sitting him his car, minding his own business.
She can be clearly seen answering orders to stay away. There is little doubt they would have gunned her down too.
We need to make sure all blacks have video cameras.
Wouldn't it be great if "ObamaPhones" were real? RWNJ traitors are too stupid to know they're not but its time we made sure all blacks videoed cops.
No, it's tragic that "ObamaPhones" ARE real. When did we get into the business of giving phone service to everyone??? Government can do more to help people, but not give everyone a phone.
Maybe this will help.I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.
That's my point.Dude, the entirety of the shooting and the immediate aftermath is on the video and there is nothing at his feet.
The photo has to be sometime after the video. Does it not?
The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.
View attachment 90800
Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott
We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.
A "throw down" gun would be far easier to add to a video.
A video the wife took?
Explain how that happened when there is no gun in her video.
" He bet' not be dett! Now I gots to be on dem food stamps! He bet' not! We gots bills tuh pay!"I just watched it on FOX. Pretty crappy wife, looks like suicide by cop and Incan see why.Turn on your news station fool. Don't turn on Fox. I bet they won't show it.So where's the video?
She kept this hidden and let the rioting and burning and looting continue? One man was murdered by the protestors, others they tried to set on fire, others were beaten by gangs and the wife sat on this? Jesus H Christ!Wife to police:
Don't shoot him
He has no weapon
He didn't do anything
He doesn't have a gun. He has a TVI. He just took his medicine.
(to her husband) get out of the car. Don't let them break the window.
Get out of the car.
(four or five shoots fired)
Don't you do it.
Did you shoot him?
He better not be fucking dead.
Yep, he better live.
I'm not coming over there.
I'm video taping you.
He better not be dead
he better not be dead fuckers
did you call an ambulance?
He better not be dead
(officers said drop the gun 12 times
So far no evidence of gun
she told them he had a brain injury)
But get this. In the police picture, it looks like there is a gun on the ground. But in the family video, there is NO object that looks like a gun. No object at all. Nothing.
-----------------
This is going to be a trip.
That's my point.Do you have time stamped evidence to back your suspicion? If you do....show me it.OK.
There is nothing at his feet during the video.
The photo is sometime after the video.
It seems odd to me that the police would later place a gun on the ground rather than render it safe and secure it as evidence.
Dude, the entirety of the shooting and the immediate aftermath is on the video and there is nothing at his feet.
The photo has to be sometime after the video. Does it not?
The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.
View attachment 90800
Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott
We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.
No she is telling the POLICE, don't do it, don't shoot him.Why would the officers be yelling "drop the gun" repeatedly if he didnt have a gun?
And the women was telling her husband "dont do it" so what exactly was she referring to?
So, now that we've acknowledged that Obamaphones do indeed exist and every black should have one, unless ID is required I guess, then we can assume that most blacks have cameras, right?First Obamaphones didn't exist, now they go back to the Wilson Administration.You're an idiot. I mean, you really really are stooopid. It was started as far back at President Wilson's administration. Why can't you RWNJ traitors ever learn?
Who knew?!
http://www.regulatorystaff.sc.gov/Documents/Lifeline/Revised History of Lifeline.pdf
Lifeline Facts
History of the Lifeline Assistance Program
Somebody photoshopped it maybe, dipshit?That's my point.Do you have time stamped evidence to back your suspicion? If you do....show me it.
Dude, the entirety of the shooting and the immediate aftermath is on the video and there is nothing at his feet.
The photo has to be sometime after the video. Does it not?
The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.
View attachment 90800
Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott
We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.
Can you read?
The only officer in a red shirt is bent over Scott in the photo. If you watch the video, he never does that. Therefore, it must be sometime after the video. If that is indeed a gun in the photo, how did it get there?
Maybe this will help.I watched the video and cant see a damn thing, please be specific and explain how it proves he didn't have a firearm. Just because she is saying he doesn't have one doesn't prove anything. And on the video you can not see anything.
Photo released by police claiming gun on ground.
![]()
Still from video right after shooting showing no throw down gun on the ground yet.
![]()
No she was not, you imbecile. She says his name multiple times. God damn youre stupid.No she is telling the POLICE, don't do it, don't shoot him.Why would the officers be yelling "drop the gun" repeatedly if he didnt have a gun?
And the women was telling her husband "dont do it" so what exactly was she referring to?
That's my point.The guy was already on the ground with cops around him when she came around the car and got a clear shot.
The very first thing the cops are going to do is remove the weapon so there is no chance the suspect can gain access to it.
This would be done immediately so she wouldnt have caught it in the video.
Then where did the photo come from?
Also the officer in red is bending over Scott in the photo with the purported gun. He never does that in the video. The photo has to be sometime after the video.
View attachment 90800
Video here
Video Emerges From Scene Of Charlotte Police Shooting Of Keith Scott
We dont know where the pic originated.
And I find it highly unlikely that the cops would take a still from her video and photo shop a gun into it.
A "throw down" gun would be far easier to add to a video.
A video the wife took?
Explain how that happened when there is no gun in her video.
EXACTLY! Now you get it..heh heh heh!
We have people that will troll the public in the worst way, Hutch. It's quite possible that picture is bullshit. Why was his wife telling him"Don't you do that!" ?
Don't you do it was to her husband. Police just wanted to arrest him.No she is telling the POLICE, don't do it, don't shoot him.Why would the officers be yelling "drop the gun" repeatedly if he didnt have a gun?
And the women was telling her husband "dont do it" so what exactly was she referring to?