On Refugees, Federal Law Requires Government To ‘Take Into Account Recommendations Of The State’

[ShootSpeeders]

Every state needs to say NO WAY we want obozo to dump 100,000 welfare bums on us.

On Refugees, Federal Law Requires Government To ‘Take Into Account Recommendations Of The State’

nov 17 2015 As dozens of governors voice opposition to resettling Syrian refugees into their states in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris, there is pushback against the concept of states having a say in that process. But federal law does leave room for states to have input, in spite of what some are saying.

The liberal activist group ThinkProgress has a piece entitled “No, State Governors Can’t Refuse To Accept Syrian Refugees,” states:

But the issue is not as cut and dry as progressives would make it seem.

Section 412 (B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states clearly, “With respect to the location of placement of refugees within a State, the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1) shall, consistent with such policies and strategies and to the maximum extent possible, take into account recommendations of the State.”

 

[TheOldSchool]

Every state needs to say NO WAY we want obozo to dump 100,000 welfare bums on us.

On Refugees, Federal Law Requires Government To ‘Take Into Account Recommendations Of The State’

nov 17 2015 As dozens of governors voice opposition to resettling Syrian refugees into their states in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris, there is pushback against the concept of states having a say in that process. But federal law does leave room for states to have input, in spite of what some are saying.

The liberal activist group ThinkProgress has a piece entitled “No, State Governors Can’t Refuse To Accept Syrian Refugees,” states:

But the issue is not as cut and dry as progressives would make it seem.

Section 412 (B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states clearly, “With respect to the location of placement of refugees within a State, the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1) shall, consistent with such policies and strategies and to the maximum extent possible, take into account recommendations of the State.”

I'll "take into account" the recommendations of your post.

 

[jwoodie]

What if it doesn't? By filibustering the Senate, the Dems can let Obama do (or not do) anything he wants.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

 

[BULLDOG]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

So now you think you are a constitutional scholar...........The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[.The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

Prolly right but they have a very good argument for saying no to all these welfare bums/democrat voters that obozo wants to dump on them

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Okay, States, thanks for your input, they arrive on Monday.

Fuck the states. And by the way, you don't shit where you eat, you don't bomb where you live. Keep that in mind.

 

[the_human_being]

I wonder if by April following the election, they will be finished counting all the Trump votes?

 

[Skylar]

Every state needs to say NO WAY we want obozo to dump 100,000 welfare bums on us.

On Refugees, Federal Law Requires Government To ‘Take Into Account Recommendations Of The State’

nov 17 2015 As dozens of governors voice opposition to resettling Syrian refugees into their states in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris, there is pushback against the concept of states having a say in that process. But federal law does leave room for states to have input, in spite of what some are saying.

The liberal activist group ThinkProgress has a piece entitled “No, State Governors Can’t Refuse To Accept Syrian Refugees,” states:

But the issue is not as cut and dry as progressives would make it seem.

Section 412 (B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states clearly, “With respect to the location of placement of refugees within a State, the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1) shall, consistent with such policies and strategies and to the maximum extent possible, take into account recommendations of the State.”

None of the factors cited in the actual law have a thing to do with what the Governors are complaining about.

 

[koshergrl]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

So now you think you are a constitutional scholar...........The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

I doubt it, lol.

 

[Skylar]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

So now you think you are a constitutional scholar...........The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

I doubt it, lol.

The Right To Travel is well established. On what basis would a State deny it to legal residents of the US?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

So now you think you are a constitutional scholar...........The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

I doubt it, lol.

Dumbass, they don't have a choice. It's a Federal issue. They got their asses handed to them last time, and this will be no different.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

By the tenth amendment, the whole refugee issue is a state matter. All the constitution grants the feds is the authority "to establish a uniform rule for naturalization" and no one is talking about giving theses unvetted syrians instant citizenship.

So now you think you are a constitutional scholar...........The states can whine all they want, but in this case, they will do what they are told.

I doubt it, lol.

The Right To Travel is well established. On what basis would a State deny it to legal residents of the US?

They can no more stop that than they can stop the buses bringing them in for resettlement.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

The Right To Travel is well established. On what basis would a State deny it to legal residents of the US?

The 5 million americans on parole or probation are restricted on travel

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Dumbass, they don't have a choice. It's a Federal issue. They got their asses handed to them last time, and this will be no different.

The constitution says refugee settlement is a state issue. THINK

 

[BULLDOG]

Dumbass, they don't have a choice. It's a Federal issue. They got their asses handed to them last time, and this will be no different.

The constitution says refugee settlement is a state issue. THINK

Where does it say that?

 

[guno]