ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
I didn't say he did. Every president since raygun has invoked executive privilege. Liability and you give all of them a pass. I guess youve never noticed until Obama did it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I too want to know what national security secrets are so important that he has to hide behind EP in this situation.
Then they wouldn't be secrets anymore.
I didn't say he did. Every president since raygun has invoked executive privilege. Liability and you give all of them a pass. I guess youve never noticed until Obama did it.
Newsflash for ClosedMindedNot all invocations of Executive Privilege are created equal. You may not CARE for the Bush claims, but they at least explained their bases. YOU cannot point to one word of "explanation" from the incumbent and his Administration for this latest claim.
But go on pretending that it's all ok.
But but but that's different.
It is diufferent to invoke it WITH an explanation compared to invoking it without an explanation.
But pretend otherwise. That oughta sooth your liberal butthurt.
But but but that's different.
It is diufferent to invoke it WITH an explanation compared to invoking it without an explanation.
But pretend otherwise. That oughta sooth your liberal butthurt.
And what explanation was good enough for you that came from every president since Raygun? You don't know, let me her you say it.
I didn't say he did. Every president since raygun has invoked executive privilege. Liability and you give all of them a pass. I guess youve never noticed until Obama did it.
Untrue, as you knew when you posted it.
I would give the President a pass, too, IF he would offer an HONEST basis for why he invoked it -- which all the other Presidents DID provide.
Buit again, pretend it's ok when your Obamessiah doesn't bother, you hack.
Key word would be honest, obamaturd and holder are anything but.On WHAT HONEST basis does the Obama Administration make the CLAIM of Executive Privilege over the Fast and Furious papers, notes and e-mails?
I don't think they HAVE any HONEST basis to invoke Executive Privilege.
Why won't the President 'splain his action, in detail?
Isn't it "curious" how little the national media seems interested in pressing him on it?
Maybe they are afraid of appearing "rude?"
Obamaturd has yet to be honest.I didn't say he did. Every president since raygun has invoked executive privilege. Liability and you give all of them a pass. I guess youve never noticed until Obama did it.
Untrue, as you knew when you posted it.
I would give the President a pass, too, IF he would offer an HONEST basis for why he invoked it -- which all the other Presidents DID provide.
Buit again, pretend it's ok when your Obamessiah doesn't bother, you hack.
Oh so you want an explanation but not any explanation an explanation that you determine to be honest. The bar has risen. Tell me what honest explanation did every president since Raygun?
Key word being honest because the bar has to be so high that Obama could never reach it. For example, no explanation from Obama will be considered honest. But he excuses all the other presidents because....because, uh...he can't explain.
Key word being honest because the bar has to be so high that Obama could never reach it. For example, no explanation from Obama will be considered honest. But he excuses all the other presidents because....because, uh...he can't explain.
Key word being honest because the bar has to be so high that Obama could never reach it. For example, no explanation from Obama will be considered honest. But he excuses all the other presidents because....because, uh...he can't explain.
Disclosure of documents and an accountability to why the DOJ lied for 10 months would work for starters.
I didn't say he did. Every president since raygun has invoked executive privilege. Liability and you give all of them a pass. I guess youve never noticed until Obama did it.
Untrue, as you knew when you posted it.
I would give the President a pass, too, IF he would offer an HONEST basis for why he invoked it -- which all the other Presidents DID provide.
Buit again, pretend it's ok when your Obamessiah doesn't bother, you hack.
Oh so you want an explanation but not any explanation an explanation that you determine to be honest. The bar has risen. Tell me what honest explanation did every president since [Reagan]?
I was just quoting JIll. it is pretty damn low innit?
and i am just quoting you. You are scum yes.
yes, you are scum. I agree
V. On July 13, less than a week after claiming executive privilege for Miers and Taylor, Counsel Fielding effectively claimed the privilege once again, this time in relation to documents related to the 2004 death of Army Ranger Pat Tillman. In a letter to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Fielding claimed certain papers relating to discussion of the friendly-fire shooting implicate Executive Branch confidentiality interests and would therefore not be turned over to the committee.
your lying againHe is dead isn't he? Yes, and Jillian doesn't care. All she cares about is giving the finger to Issa.
You wouldn't give two shits for Brian Terry's life if you still had control of your own bowels.
BTW, you lie a lot.
i think they're just giving the finger to issa.
now... do i agree with them doing that?
no.
the left are making it political, all they want is to give Issa the finger!
How about ongoing operations that could put agents in the field in jeopardy?On WHAT HONEST basis does the Obama Administration make the CLAIM of Executive Privilege over the Fast and Furious papers, notes and e-mails?
I don't think they HAVE any HONEST basis to invoke Executive Privilege.
Why won't the President 'splain his action, in detail?
Isn't it "curious" how little the national media seems interested in pressing him on it?
Maybe they are afraid of appearing "rude?"
Dick Cheney....Immediate adviser to the President. Executive Privledge covers the President and his advisers. This is so that they can give the President honest and open advice without having to worry about having to answer to charges for doing so.Flashback to 2002:
In the brewing battle over the release of Vice President Cheneys energy task force records, Cheney says hes taking a stand on principle. And he has a point: From its earliest days, the second Bush administration has demonstrated a deep ideological commitment to restoring the prerogatives of the executive branch. Right out of the box, the White House put a freeze on the release of Reagan-era records scheduled to be made public last year. Whether or not the White House has something to hide, Cheneys refusal to turn over the energy task force records is in line with this stance.
V. On July 13, less than a week after claiming executive privilege for Miers and Taylor, Counsel Fielding effectively claimed the privilege once again, this time in relation to documents related to the 2004 death of Army Ranger Pat Tillman. In a letter to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Fielding claimed certain papers relating to discussion of the friendly-fire shooting implicate Executive Branch confidentiality interests and would therefore not be turned over to the committee.
More: Executive Privilege: George W. Bush beats out Barack Obama 6 to 1 | Samuel Warde