One more example of congressional right wingers' HYPOCRISY...

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,965
1,870
The chair of the House Select Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes (R-CA) just a few days ago assured reporters that there was "a lot of nothing" in the reports of National Security Adviser Mike Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador weeks before the Trump administration was a thing. There was so much nothing there, Nunes said, Flynn was sure to keep his job.

What's he saying now that Flynn has resigned? He's following popular vote loser Trump's lead. It's not about Flynn and how Russia has compromised the administration. It's NOW about the leaks that Flynn and his Russian connections have compromised the White House.

In other words attack the leaks (forget about Russian hackers and Wikileaks) BUT NOT THE ESSENCE of what those leaks reveal.

The investigations MUST be independent.....can't trust these partisan morons.
 
The chair of the House Select Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes (R-CA) just a few days ago assured reporters that there was "a lot of nothing" in the reports of National Security Adviser Mike Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador weeks before the Trump administration was a thing. There was so much nothing there, Nunes said, Flynn was sure to keep his job.

What's he saying now that Flynn has resigned? He's following popular vote loser Trump's lead. It's not about Flynn and how Russia has compromised the administration. It's NOW about the leaks that Flynn and his Russian connections have compromised the White House.

In other words attack the leaks (forget about Russian hackers and Wikileaks) BUT NOT THE ESSENCE of what those leaks reveal.

The investigations MUST be independent.....can't trust these partisan morons.

Nat, have you been professionally diagnosed yet?
You need to be seen bud.
You're 100% a schizophrenic.
 
The chair of the House Select Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes (R-CA) just a few days ago assured reporters that there was "a lot of nothing" in the reports of National Security Adviser Mike Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador weeks before the Trump administration was a thing. There was so much nothing there, Nunes said, Flynn was sure to keep his job.

What's he saying now that Flynn has resigned? He's following popular vote loser Trump's lead. It's not about Flynn and how Russia has compromised the administration. It's NOW about the leaks that Flynn and his Russian connections have compromised the White House.

In other words attack the leaks (forget about Russian hackers and Wikileaks) BUT NOT THE ESSENCE of what those leaks reveal.

The investigations MUST be independent.....can't trust these partisan morons.

Nat, have you been professionally diagnosed yet?
You need to be seen bud.
You're 100% a schizophrenic.
What qualifies you to diagnose?
 
PissOffLibs.jpg
 
Oh, shut up!!! Look at all the 0bama scandals, where were you?
Look at the Democrats who hired 3 Muslim Brotherhood spies who hacked their servers and gained access to SECRET information as well as their files....the Libs are quietly trying to make that story go away.
 
Is that hypocrisy better or worse than the stupid SHIT that OP posted prior to the election. Including stating that obstruction strategy within government is committing TREASON, as is anyone interfering with the peaceful transfer of power.
 
Last edited:
Is that hypocrisy better or worse than the stupid SHIT that OP posted prior to the election. Including stating that obstruction strategy within government is committing TREASON, as is anyone interfering with the peaceful transfer of power.
Remember that with the amount of Dope the left takes in daily, their memory is about as long as a pinhead. That is why they call for hypocrisy, which their side always does.
 
chair of the House Select Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes (R-CA) just a few days ago assured reporters that there was "a lot of nothing" in the reports of National Security Adviser Mike Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador

The hypocrisy of it is the least of my concerns.

That the man stated the matter is "a lot of nothing," indicates he either...
  • didn't know the full scope of what happened and was going on, or
  • didn't understand the full scope of what happened and was going on, or
  • flat out lied....
None of those things is as insignificant as the hypocrisy of it. The ignorance, stupidity, or dishonesty he exhibited is far more disconcerting to me.
 
Right wingers on here are scared shit-less that the entire Trump "house of cards" may be starting to tumble....
Poor babies.
 
The chair of the House Select Intelligence Committee Devin Nunes (R-CA) just a few days ago assured reporters that there was "a lot of nothing" in the reports of National Security Adviser Mike Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador weeks before the Trump administration was a thing. There was so much nothing there, Nunes said, Flynn was sure to keep his job.

What's he saying now that Flynn has resigned? He's following popular vote loser Trump's lead. It's not about Flynn and how Russia has compromised the administration. It's NOW about the leaks that Flynn and his Russian connections have compromised the White House.

In other words attack the leaks (forget about Russian hackers and Wikileaks) BUT NOT THE ESSENCE of what those leaks reveal.

The investigations MUST be independent.....can't trust these partisan morons.
let sessions step down recuse himself
 

Forum List

Back
Top