Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
Evidently you know nothing about the law. One is a unproven cannibal and the other possessed child pornography. Pick 2 cases where they are both breaking the law by harming children and maybe I would get your weird point that no one asked you about.
The first is not an unproven cannibal, it is fantasy. The second did not posses child pornography because no children were involved in making the movies. That, according to SCOTUS, makes the images legal fantasy.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Virtual Child Pornography Law : Silha Center : University of Minnesota