Palestine Today

[Shazoomx4]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

"Battery against a police officer involves causing injury to a law enforcement officer (or, in some states, attempting to or threatening to cause injury). It is treated as a very serious crime. Many states have specific and harsh penalties that apply to battery against a police officer."

Meet Ahed Tamimi, 17-Year-Old West Bank Activist Jailed 8 Months for Slapping Israeli Soldier

(COMMENT)

It was not a "soldier." It was an Israeli Border Police Officer ("MAGAV").

The "MAGAV" [a form of Gendarme (sometimes the ranks are augmented by members of the IDF)] have duties in Area C of the West Bank, and in such territory where Israeli civilian control has been established.

Arab Palestinian arguments that claim that "AhedTamimi" had the right to assault the Police Officer, is a clear acknowledgment that the Arab Palestinian are above the law and bare no consequences for their criminal actions. Not only do they have no understanding for the Rule of Law, but - forgot what law and order are.

Most Respectfully,
R

It was not an activist, it was more a terror supporter

Ahh, Israel's old terrorist canard again.

Is name calling all you got?

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

 

[rylah]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

"Battery against a police officer involves causing injury to a law enforcement officer (or, in some states, attempting to or threatening to cause injury). It is treated as a very serious crime. Many states have specific and harsh penalties that apply to battery against a police officer."

Meet Ahed Tamimi, 17-Year-Old West Bank Activist Jailed 8 Months for Slapping Israeli Soldier

(COMMENT)

It was not a "soldier." It was an Israeli Border Police Officer ("MAGAV").

The "MAGAV" [a form of Gendarme (sometimes the ranks are augmented by members of the IDF)] have duties in Area C of the West Bank, and in such territory where Israeli civilian control has been established.

Arab Palestinian arguments that claim that "AhedTamimi" had the right to assault the Police Officer, is a clear acknowledgment that the Arab Palestinian are above the law and bare no consequences for their criminal actions. Not only do they have no understanding for the Rule of Law, but - forgot what law and order are.

Most Respectfully,
R

It was not a "soldier." It was an Israeli Border Police Officer

Same shit different platter.

Foreigners who defend and engage in criminal activities. Calling them law enforcement is a big joke.

Talking about foreigners,
have the Tamimis relinquished their claim to the lands of Qatar in favor of Nabi Saleh?

The Tamimi Tribe Baghdad 1939

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

"Battery against a police officer involves causing injury to a law enforcement officer (or, in some states, attempting to or threatening to cause injury). It is treated as a very serious crime. Many states have specific and harsh penalties that apply to battery against a police officer."

(COMMENT)

It was not a "soldier." It was an Israeli Border Police Officer ("MAGAV").

The "MAGAV" [a form of Gendarme (sometimes the ranks are augmented by members of the IDF)] have duties in Area C of the West Bank, and in such territory where Israeli civilian control has been established.

Arab Palestinian arguments that claim that "AhedTamimi" had the right to assault the Police Officer, is a clear acknowledgment that the Arab Palestinian are above the law and bare no consequences for their criminal actions. Not only do they have no understanding for the Rule of Law, but - forgot what law and order are.

Most Respectfully,
R

It was not an activist, it was more a terror supporter

Ahh, Israel's old terrorist canard again.

Is name calling all you got?

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

 

[rylah]

It was not an activist, it was more a terror supporter

Ahh, Israel's old terrorist canard again.

Is name calling all you got?

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Ahh, Israel's old terrorist canard again.

Is name calling all you got?

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

Another voice to the mantra.

 

[rylah]

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

Another voice to the mantra.

So how is that Your every argument against the Israeli side ends with this insistence to deny the Israeli voice by default?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

Another voice to the mantra.

So how is that Your every argument against the Israeli side ends with this insistence to deny the Israeli voice by default?

Israel has been shoveling the same shit for decades.

Give it a rest.

 

[rylah]

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

Another voice to the mantra.

So how is that Your every argument against the Israeli side ends with this insistence to deny the Israeli voice by default?

Israel has been shoveling the same shit for decades.

Give it a rest.

It's something people, say to deflect from the weeds in their backyard.
What are You talking about?

 

[Shazoomx4]

It was not an activist, it was more a terror supporter

Ahh, Israel's old terrorist canard again.

Is name calling all you got?

I called her what she was.. she is a terror support.
when she annoys IDF in action they can miss a terrorist come.
So, by definition, she terror supporter...

IDF in action

Like stealing land and shooting unarmed protestors.

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

You came for the same just for the Palestinians

 

[rylah]

More like protecting on land and shooting on armed terrorist?

Did you come here just to spout Israeli talking points?

We have plenty of those already.

So Your main argument is that Israelis should be blocked by default from expressing their views?

This is an infantile impotency,
symptom of most anti-Israeli arguments.

Another voice to the mantra.

So how is that Your every argument against the Israeli side ends with this insistence to deny the Israeli voice by default?

Israel has been shoveling the same shit for decades.

Give it a rest.

Well, the Jihadis are not too inventive, have been doing the same shit and failing for decades.
Run to Your safe space.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

The crisis in Islamic terrorism.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Students For Justice in Palestine NYC: The One State Solution

 

[Shazoomx4]

Students For Justice in Palestine NYC: The One State Solution

One state solution not going to happen.
It is worse than the two state solution..

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Neither is going to happen, at least I don't think. The sides are too far apart and there are those pesky religious differences.

 

[rylah]

Students For Justice in Palestine NYC: The One State Solution

And in short please?

 

[Shazoomx4]

Students For Justice in Palestine NYC: The One State Solution

And in short please?

In short? what is happening in Syria? Egypt? Lebanon? any Arab state? not include a state with a lot of oil.... just die, poverty, killing and primitive Islamic rules...

 

[rylah]

Neither is going to happen, at least I don't think. The sides are too far apart and there are those pesky religious differences.

Religious difference can be a key, what many are afraid to deal with should be dealt with most readiness and openly. Israel has a potential of motivating the religious solution, or some sort of secular reformation in the Arab world.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Neither is going to happen, at least I don't think. The sides are too far apart and there are those pesky religious differences.

Religious difference can be a key, what many are afraid to deal with should be dealt with most readiness and openly. Israel has a potential of motivating the religious solution, or some sort of secular reformation in the Arab world.

I don't see how? Would you mind elanborating on this please?

 

[rylah]

Neither is going to happen, at least I don't think. The sides are too far apart and there are those pesky religious differences.

Religious difference can be a key, what many are afraid to deal with should be dealt with most readiness and openly. Israel has a potential of motivating the religious solution, or some sort of secular reformation in the Arab world.

I don't see how? Would you mind elanborating on this please?

By being a leading player in the middle east, the one that has the most to offer.
By steadily developing one's own worth and building bridges with past enemies.
By organizing mediums for long - term direct exchange between leaders of local communities, including those with opposing and most critical voices.
By balancing liberalism with religious heritage.

To talk about theological aspects of the conflict would require a whole thread.
From my point of view, with real learned scholars of Islam, there can be reached more agreement on those issues, rather than with purely political attitude.
There's debate between Christianity, Judaism and Islam separately, but everyone is supposed to be afraid of an open discussion between Judaism and Islam. So we're especially obligated to engage in that exchange on a more vocal and clear level.

But basically there're 2 trends I'm referring to -. Israeli Jews are becoming more traditional while Israeli Arabs, ad as a whole in the west and middle east are becoming more secular. In my view the situation is reaching a new equilibrium in 2-3 generations when the ideological distance between the 2 civilizations is less apparent.