It's a sport. Cheating in sports is to be lambasted, not defended.How about if we just talk about every close game the Patriots had this year. You know the ones where the advantage would have made a significant difference. This not to even involve discussions regarding momentum of small victories have to the overall games, given that most games are tossups decided based on said momentum.The pats were not the best team in the league. They were the best cheaters. Sure they won the super bowl, sure they were better than the other team in that game, but the only reason they got to the super-bowl in the first place is because they got away with cheating the better teams.The saying around New England goes something like this...
They only hate us...because they ain't us!
Stop your whining about cheating and go get yourselves coaches that work hard and players that play hard. As the second half of the AFC Championship game and the Super Bowl proved...the Patriots don't need to "cheat" to win.
You know...that claim might be valid if the Patriots hadn't crushed the Colts in the second half of their playoff game playing with conforming footballs. Are you making the claim that the Patriots "cheated" the Ravens the week before that? Because even John Harbaugh came out and admitted that nothing the Patriots did was illegal...it was simply something the Ravens weren't ready for and didn't respond well to. You'll have to explain how it is you think the Patriots "cheated" the Seahawks. It was a great game between two great teams and the Patriots won on a fantastic play at the finish.
Out of curiosity, do you care about things like this for any team, or is it just when the Patriots supposedly do it?
Before you "lambaste"...don't you think you should first prove that someone actually cheated? You haven't done so in any way at all...yet you still seem to feel that it's OK to find the Patriots guilty without doing so.
Your accusations are all so vague, RKM...is that on purpose?