Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling

[Moonglow]

Wrong as usual the Supreme Court is the final word in what is legal and Constitutional.

Show me where they have the legal ability to overstep their bounds just as they did with Roe VS Wade.

 

[martybegan]

The states have the right to make their own election laws.

Same as Abortion laws right?

 

[westwall]

Does this increase or decrease citizens faith in elections? Will your DOJ get involved?

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling

Pennsylvania election officials have been instructed to count ballots arriving in undated envelopes despite a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling​

A top election official in Pennsylvania says the state will disregard the U.S. Supreme Court's guidance on counting mail-in ballots arriving in envelopes with typos or incorrect dates, saying that the state's Commonwealth Court has already established the practice as licit.

Pennsylvania's election laws have historically required voters to include a signature and date on the outside of return envelopes when voting by mail.

However, acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman announced that Pennsylvania election officials should continue counting ballots that arrive with improperly filled-out envelopes, in accordance with the Commonwealth Court's previous ruling on the matter.

Oh, decreases, of course. Don't you just love people who feel they are above the law?

 

[BlindBoo]

Gee, I wonder who put them up to it.

Does it matter? Taking it to a court is a legal way to object and effect a change.

Shit's getting old.

Don't you have anything else?

Never stop fighting the Fascist!

 

[ClaireH]

What does that state's legislature say about that?

Good question Duke, and certainly relevant since PA (and WI) violated its own state’s legislative election laws in 2020 about changing rules.

“The universal mail-voting law violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. The commonwealth’s Constitution requires a person to vote on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. Changing the mail-balloting laws in Pennsylvania would require a constitutional amendment. ”

In 2020, the Wisconsin Elections Commission authorized “municipal clerks and local elections officials to establish ballot drop boxes” and said that people acting on behalf of the voter could deliver his or her ballot to these drop boxes.

Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg gave millions of dollars to election offices to change election procedures and fuel vote-by-mail efforts. The Capital Research Center uncovered that the Center for Technology and Civic Life, the non-profit Zuckerberg funneled his money through, gave Wisconsin election offices at least $6.7 million in 2020.
Much of this $6.7 million was used to set up drop boxes, which fueled ballot harvesting. Ballot harvesting refers to a person returning ballots that are not their own. For example, you go to a drop box and return your ballot, your husband’s, and your two neighbors’.”

Courts Rule States Did Not Follow Their Own Election Laws In 2020

Pennsylvania and Wisconsin violated their own laws in 2020, emphasizing the necessity of the rule of law in elections.

thefederalist.com

Election integrity? Not in those swing states.

 

[BlindBoo]

Pennsylvania's mail-in voting law is upheld by the state's Supreme Court

All voters in the key swing state can continue casting ballots by mail now that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld a law that was challenged by some GOP state lawmakers who helped pass it.

www.npr.org

But the beat goes on....

"Last month, the group of Republican legislators in this case filed another lawsuit over Act 77, opening another front in the legal fight over the law's mail-in voting provisions.

In a court filing, they present a different argument for why Act 77 should be struck down, based on a ruling in a separate but related federal lawsuit, which the U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to review."

 

[Cellblock2429]

Does this increase or decrease citizens faith in elections? Will your DOJ get involved?

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling

Pennsylvania election officials have been instructed to count ballots arriving in undated envelopes despite a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com

Pennsylvania to count undated ballots, election official says, despite US Supreme Court ruling​

A top election official in Pennsylvania says the state will disregard the U.S. Supreme Court's guidance on counting mail-in ballots arriving in envelopes with typos or incorrect dates, saying that the state's Commonwealth Court has already established the practice as licit.

Pennsylvania's election laws have historically required voters to include a signature and date on the outside of return envelopes when voting by mail.

However, acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman announced that Pennsylvania election officials should continue counting ballots that arrive with improperly filled-out envelopes, in accordance with the Commonwealth Court's previous ruling on the matter.

/——-/ Well, Hell’s Bells. How do you expect democrats to stay in power if they don’t cheat?

 

[DGS49]

All you need to know: Pennsylvania Supreme Court - 5 Democrats, 2 Republicans.

USSC will not even consider cases that the PA SC has ruled on, when the question is PA laws or the PA Constitution.

Any questions?

 

[scruffy]

Not according to the Constitution, the USSC over ruled a valid action, which shows the conservative led court is stepping over it's boundaries.

28 days

 

[scruffy]

Show me where they have the legal ability to overstep their bounds just as they did with Roe VS Wade.

Oh shut up, stupid DNC lemming.

Go fly a kite or something.

 

[jc456]

The states have the right to make their own election laws.

The Secretary of State is not the state

 

[OldFlame]

The democrats in Pa don’t give a good shit about what the law says. They want the right to rig any election they want and I predict they will be able to get away with that. Democrats are above any rule of law.

Yep, it's 2020 all over again with rules being changed on the fly right before an election. It's totally disgusting and corrupt.

 

[notmyfault2020]

But PA law does not say so.

I like how you defend election theft

what a creep

 

[OldFlame]

We all know what this is about…This is about the democrat SOS, the democrat governor, and the democrat 3rd circuit saying ‘we’re going to cheat’ to install another brain addled Marxist.

The PA attorney general, Shapiro, who is running for governor, is being rewarded for his work in 2020. Can't let him lose. Just so happens to be a tight race (God knows why.. ) between Oz and Fetterman (Another leftist lackey), the Senate is up for grabs. So just like in 2020, we'll see all kinds of bullshit going on in close races, just like the swing states did back then.

 

[OldFlame]

Good question Duke, and certainly relevant since PA (and WI) violated its own state’s legislative election laws in 2020 about changing rules.

“The universal mail-voting law violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. The commonwealth’s Constitution requires a person to vote on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. Changing the mail-balloting laws in Pennsylvania would require a constitutional amendment. ”

In 2020, the Wisconsin Elections Commission authorized “municipal clerks and local elections officials to establish ballot drop boxes” and said that people acting on behalf of the voter could deliver his or her ballot to these drop boxes.

Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg gave millions of dollars to election offices to change election procedures and fuel vote-by-mail efforts. The Capital Research Center uncovered that the Center for Technology and Civic Life, the non-profit Zuckerberg funneled his money through, gave Wisconsin election offices at least $6.7 million in 2020.
Much of this $6.7 million was used to set up drop boxes, which fueled ballot harvesting. Ballot harvesting refers to a person returning ballots that are not their own. For example, you go to a drop box and return your ballot, your husband’s, and your two neighbors’.”

Courts Rule States Did Not Follow Their Own Election Laws In 2020

Pennsylvania and Wisconsin violated their own laws in 2020, emphasizing the necessity of the rule of law in elections.

thefederalist.com

Election integrity? Not in those swing states.

Exactly, and those that perpetrated this are going to be rewarded with a governor and senator seat, using the same tactics.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Show me where they have the legal ability to overstep their bounds just as they did with Roe VS Wade.

They have no bounds in regards the Constitution stupid moron THEY are the final arbiter of what is and is not Constitutional.

 

[BlindBoo]

They have no bounds in regards the Constitution stupid moron THEY are the final arbiter of what is and is not Constitutional.

If this highly partisan court proves nothing else, it is that no precedent is final.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If this highly partisan court proves nothing else, it is that no precedent is final.

No precedent was ever final.... or will you now admit that Plessy should never have been overturned or separate but equal?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Cheating is the lifeblood of the democrat Party

 

[The Duke]

Show me where they have the legal ability to overstep their bounds just as they did with Roe VS Wade.

That goes back to the 10th amendment. It's up to the States as to how they want to handle abortion.

On that note, Planned Parenthood should be dissolved as a Federal entity.