Police offices involved in G. Floyd's death were suspended the next day--aftermorethan a month we still do not know who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt

Bud, if this is the best you've got, you should have stayed on the sidelines. She tried to force her way into a secure corridor and she got shot. She was participating in a violent insurrection.
Being a veteran of 14 years, she should have known the dangers.

She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.

Let's try this: He was a man of the streets from birth. He should have known the risks of a police interaction. How does that sit moron.

Did this man take an oath to defend his country from all enemies both foreign and domestic? If not, it doesn't sit at all. In fact, it isn't relevant.
She was a veteran. She participated in a violent insurrection aimed at overturning the results of a free and fair election. She got what she deserved.
 
The officer who shot her won't be facing charges. Again, she was a 14 year Air Force veteran. She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And then ended up pissing all over that oath by participating in a violent insurrection. She became that domestic enemy. I hate seeing people die like this..but again, she should have known better.

1612744028021.png


Was she in uniform?

Was she armed?

Had an insurrection been declared by the president or congress?

Sounds more like you just lining people up against the wall...

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
The officer who shot her won't be facing charges. Again, she was a 14 year Air Force veteran. She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And then ended up pissing all over that oath by participating in a violent insurrection. She became that domestic enemy. I hate seeing people die like this..but again, she should have known better.
She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic.
And that's exactly what she died attempting to do, dumpass. Her murderer needs to be held responsible for his actions. Her family and friends deserve to see justice done.

No she wasn't. She had become just another Q believing lemming. Look at this ladies social media presence over the last year and you'll see EXACTLY what kind of shit that the cult of Trump hath wrought.
Again, when she went into the service, did she raise her right hand and swear an oath to this county? That is the ONLY question you need to answer.
I swore the same oath. To protect and defend the Constitution (not the government or whatever you decide to call "this country") against all enemies foreign and domestic which may include you and traitorous members of the government (or-in this case- claiming to be members of the government). How can you ignore her Constitutional Right to free speech, assembly, and due process? Your willingness to overlook her rights in furtherance of your selfish totalitarian agenda labels you an enemy of the Constitution as well.

A storm of the Capitol in an attempt to overturn the results of a free and fair election. Treason. Sedition.
Free speech and assembly? Would have been hanging out on the perimeter of the Capitol grounds and protesting..not storming it.
 
The officer who shot her won't be facing charges. Again, she was a 14 year Air Force veteran. She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And then ended up pissing all over that oath by participating in a violent insurrection. She became that domestic enemy. I hate seeing people die like this..but again, she should have known better.

View attachment 454396

Was she in uniform?

Was she armed?

Had an insurrection been declared by the president or congress?

Sounds more like you just lining people up against the wall...

*****SMILE*****



:)


Dude I like Pink Floyd too but you need to get a life. She was a veteran of 14 years. She should have known the risks.
Trump called for a march to the Capitol and to fight like hell. But sure..it was meant to be peaceful. :)
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
 
Bud, if this is the best you've got, you should have stayed on the sidelines. She tried to force her way into a secure corridor and she got shot. She was participating in a violent insurrection.
Being a veteran of 14 years, she should have known the dangers.

She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.

Let's try this: He was a man of the streets from birth. He should have known the risks of a police interaction. How does that sit moron.

Did this man take an oath to defend his country from all enemies both foreign and domestic? If not, it doesn't sit at all. In fact, it isn't relevant.
She was a veteran. She participated in a violent insurrection aimed at overturning the results of a free and fair election. She got what she deserved.

Again you defend an execution. Clearly you're crazy.
 
And that's exactly what she died attempting to do
No. She died disgracefully violating her oath.
She died with more grace and honor than you can ever hope to have.
Sorry kid, she died a terrible, disgraceful death attacking the very democracy she swore an oath to uphold. No Valhalla for her. Most likely no benefits for her survivors or military honors at the funeral either.
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
When police officers are clearly doing their duty there is rarely a trial. A short internal investigation and back to duty.
 
The officer who shot her won't be facing charges. Again, she was a 14 year Air Force veteran. She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And then ended up pissing all over that oath by participating in a violent insurrection. She became that domestic enemy. I hate seeing people die like this..but again, she should have known better.
She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic.
And that's exactly what she died attempting to do, dumpass. Her murderer needs to be held responsible for his actions. Her family and friends deserve to see justice done.

No she wasn't. She had become just another Q believing lemming. Look at this ladies social media presence over the last year and you'll see EXACTLY what kind of shit that the cult of Trump hath wrought.
Again, when she went into the service, did she raise her right hand and swear an oath to this county? That is the ONLY question you need to answer.
I swore the same oath. To protect and defend the Constitution (not the government or whatever you decide to call "this country") against all enemies foreign and domestic which may include you and traitorous members of the government (or-in this case- claiming to be members of the government). How can you ignore her Constitutional Right to free speech, assembly, and due process? Your willingness to overlook her rights in furtherance of your selfish totalitarian agenda labels you an enemy of the Constitution as well.

A storm of the Capitol in an attempt to overturn the results of a free and fair election. Treason. Sedition.
Free speech and assembly? Would have been hanging out on the perimeter of the Capitol grounds and protesting..not storming it.
You say storming, but what does the law say, otherwise in a court of law ? Has trials been conducted yet, and if not how do you make claims as to what happened, and make those claims against certain individuals before they've been to court ??
 
Bud, if this is the best you've got, you should have stayed on the sidelines. She tried to force her way into a secure corridor and she got shot. She was participating in a violent insurrection.
Being a veteran of 14 years, she should have known the dangers.

She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.

Let's try this: He was a man of the streets from birth. He should have known the risks of a police interaction. How does that sit moron.

Did this man take an oath to defend his country from all enemies both foreign and domestic? If not, it doesn't sit at all. In fact, it isn't relevant.
She was a veteran. She participated in a violent insurrection aimed at overturning the results of a free and fair election. She got what she deserved.
And exactly who are you to decide she "participated in a violent insurrection"? You are just one more pathetic sheltered individual who wouldn't know a protest from an insurrection from a rotten cucumber Mr. JackOff. By law it requires a court to make that decision. But her day in court was stolen from her, wasn't it?
 
The officer who shot her won't be facing charges. Again, she was a 14 year Air Force veteran. She did raise her hand and swear an oath to protect this country from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And then ended up pissing all over that oath by participating in a violent insurrection. She became that domestic enemy. I hate seeing people die like this..but again, she should have known better.

View attachment 454396

Was she in uniform?

Was she armed?

Had an insurrection been declared by the president or congress?

Sounds more like you just lining people up against the wall...

*****SMILE*****



:)


Dude I like Pink Floyd too but you need to get a life. She was a veteran of 14 years. She should have known the risks.
Trump called for a march to the Capitol and to fight like hell. But sure..it was meant to be peaceful. :)

1612744601934.png


You didn't answer my questions.

So it appears that the right to due process and habeas corpus must be suspended for all.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
When police officers are clearly doing their duty there is rarely a trial. A short internal investigation and back to duty.
And you think shooting down unarmed non-threatening innocent women was his duty? You need to be locked up yourself.
 
She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.
ANYONE attempting to breach a secured area in order to gain access to the individuals contained within, after they are already unlawfully on the property AND after having gained access to the property by breaching external barriers, closed and/or locked windows/doors should expect nothing less.

The fact that she was the only fatality on the mob's side speaks volumns.

She was not "executed", she suffered a fatal gunshot would while she was in the commission of a federal crime.
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
When police officers are clearly doing their duty there is rarely a trial. A short internal investigation and back to duty.
Oh really ??? So why does that not work the same when it's Drug cartels, street robbers, looters, anarchist, gangs, rioters, domestic terrorist, and other such groups identifying with the left or leftist culture's when apprehended ??
 
She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.
ANYONE attempting to breach a secured area in order to gain access to the individuals contained within, after they are already unlawfully on the property AND after having gained access to the property by breaching external barriers, closed and/or locked windows/doors should expect nothing less.

The fact that she was the only fatality on the mob's side speaks volumns.

She was not "executed", she suffered a fatal gunshot would while she was in the commission of a federal crime.
Without a trial, all your assertion's are meaningless.
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
When police officers are clearly doing their duty there is rarely a trial. A short internal investigation and back to duty.
And you think shooting down unarmed non-threatening innocent women was his duty? You need to be locked up yourself.
Violent insurrectionists. I'm shocked only one was shot. If I'd been in charge it would have been different.
 
She was not violent. You are simply defending an execution of an unarmed woman.
ANYONE attempting to breach a secured area in order to gain access to the individuals contained within, after they are already unlawfully on the property AND after having gained access to the property by breaching external barriers, closed and/or locked windows/doors should expect nothing less.

The fact that she was the only fatality on the mob's side speaks volumns.

She was not "executed", she suffered a fatal gunshot would while she was in the commission of a federal crime.
Without a trial, all your assertion's are meaningless.
There won't be a trial. There's no reason for one.
 
Nothing less than outrageous. The American people deserve better than this.

The democrats preach coming together but they practice nothing more than hatred for their political opponents.

Such hypocrites.

The person in question was killed in the process of completing a treasonous act of insurrection. The officer in question was doing. Nothing more than his duty.

This is not a similar situation.
You keep claiming that the lady was killed in the process of committing a treasonous act of insurrection, yet no trial has been conducted, and no verdicts have been rendered in such a trial that would either clear the officer's name, and therefore finalize the verdict of guilty or innocent in regards to the victims intention's or motives in the case. It's amazing how the trials by social media just take legs and walk like they do now. How evil is that ?

Everyone including the innocent should have their day in court, but for some reason the system isn't working anymore, so we get these internet wanta be lawyers convicting people, and condemning them without any conclusive evidence to go on (i.e. a trial that renders the innocent as innocent, and the perps as perps).
When police officers are clearly doing their duty there is rarely a trial. A short internal investigation and back to duty.
Oh really ??? So why does that not work the same when it's Drug cartels, street robbers, looters, anarchist, gangs, rioters, domestic terrorist, and other such groups identifying with the left or leftist culture's when apprehended ??
Just how fuckin' stupid are you? Drug cartels, domestic terrorists, street robbers, identifying with the left?

Get lost, moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top