Question for gun enthusiast.

[BULLDOG]

Banning a gun regulates it.

You didn't read the party platform?
You choose to remain ignorant?
Tsk.

"Democrats will ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high capacity magazines"

There you go.

You're confused. That's just regulation. Machine gun manufacture was banned in 86. Did that ban your guns?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Lots of talk about bump stocks and high rate of fire rifles. I understand there is a constitutional right to bear arms, but on a practical level, is there any reason for high rate of fire for anything other than self-defense? Obviously, if you are defending your home from attackers, you need that high rate of fire, and extended capacity, but are there any other circumstances where a high rate of fire and extended capacity are required?

The Second Amendment protects the right to arms, it doesn't protect the right to ALL ARMS.

You can't get SAMs, tanks etc etc.

It doesn't say "small arms", it says "arms", which is all military weaponry.

As long as you have reasonable access to "arms", they can ban many things, and do.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You're confused. That's just regulation.

You're lying.
The text of the platform, literally, uses the term "ban".

 

[BULLDOG]

You're lying.
The text of the platform, literally, uses the term "ban".

link?

 

[DukeU]

Why not have common sense regulations for the top cause of death for children?

We do.

 

[progressive hunter]

Bullshit. There is no credible effort for a prohibition on guns. We have regulations to limit unsafe use of alcohol. You can't drive while drunk. Why not have common sense regulations for the top cause of death for children?

and we have the same for guns in that you cant just shoot people with them because you want to,,

and like drinking and driving those laws dont work because criminals dont obey the laws,,,

 

[DukeU]

Bullshit. There is no credible effort for a prohibition on guns. We have regulations to limit unsafe use of alcohol. You can't drive while drunk. Why not have common sense regulations for the top cause of death for children?

Looking at the false claim that firearms are the leading cause of death …

 

[2aguy]

Bullshit. There is no credible effort for a prohibition on guns. We have regulations to limit unsafe use of alcohol. You can't drive while drunk. Why not have common sense regulations for the top cause of death for children?

Guns are not the top cause of death for children….that is a lie

 

[BULLDOG]

and we have the same for guns in that you cant just shoot people with them because you want to,,

and like drinking and driving those laws dont work because criminals dont obey the laws,,,

Do you think any laws work?

 

[progressive hunter]

Do you think any laws work?

our prisons are filled with proof they dont,,

only law abiding people care about the laws,, and they arent the ones doing all the killing now are they??

what they do do is give the people a baseline to work from for a civil society,,

enforcing the laws is to punish the ones that dont follow them, not stop them,,

 

[BULLDOG]

our prisons are filled with proof they dont,,

only law abiding people care about the laws,, and they arent the ones doing all the killing now are they??

what they do do is give the people a baseline to work from for a civil society,,

enforcing the laws is to punish the ones that dont follow them, not stop them,,

Just to be clear, you oppose all laws, right?

 

[eagle1462010]

Just to be clear, you oppose all laws, right?

OMFG

You pulling these arguments from your ass

 

[progressive hunter]

Just to be clear, you oppose all laws, right?

incorrect,,,

as I said,, they give us a baseline for a civil society so we are all on the same page,,

 

[progressive hunter]

OMFG

You pulling these arguments from your ass

for her, her ass and mouth are the same thing,,

 

[BULLDOG]

OMFG

You pulling these arguments from your ass

Progressive Dumb ass just said prison population proves laws don't work. Perhaps you should rummage around in his ass for your answer.

 

[BULLDOG]

incorrect,,,

as I said,, they give us a baseline for a civil society so we are all on the same page,,

Did someone hack your account and say

 

[progressive hunter]

Did someone hack your account and say
View attachment 972019

do you have a point??
just because criminals dont follow the law doesnt mean they arent a good baseline for civil society,,

and what the laws actually do is allows us to punish criminals and remove the dangerous ones from society,,

 

[eagle1462010]

Progressive Dumb ass just said prison population proves laws don't work. Perhaps you should rummage around in his ass for your answer.

Laws punish crime. Doesnt stop anyone from breaking them.

Which was the point moonbat

 

[BULLDOG]

do you have a point??
just because criminals dont follow the law doesnt mean they arent a good baseline for civil society,,

and what the laws actually do is allows us to punish criminals and remove the dangerous ones from society,,

You're the one that said laws don't work.

 

[progressive hunter]

You're the one that said laws don't work.

no I said criminals dont obey laws,,,

this is the 3rd time I have said they do great for a baseline for a civil society and a way to punish criminals when they do break the law,,

you have a reading problem,,