Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It clearly says one reason is because of militia which means weapons usuable by the military and the Supreme court agrees the 39 case stated a weapon must be of use in use or previously used by the military to be protected.IMHO...if the GOV says you can only have a one shot at a time...they have fulfilled their obligation to the 2nd Amen.
No where does it say you can have a extended MAG.
opinions dont count,,
it is specific that the government has no authority to dictate what we can or cant have,,
The 2nd protects the right to own and use "all bearable arms"IMHO...if the GOV says you can only have a one shot at a time...they have fulfilled their obligation to the 2nd Amen.
"Extended"?No where does it say you can have a extended MAG.
2023The fact of this matter is......
It is extremely rare that weapons are used in mass killings. Even more so with bump stocks.
Then let’s get rid of the nuts and thugs. You know what’s a great tool to use for that… a gun.I don't know what to say other than those items have become tools of nuts and thugs...way to much
It clearly says one reason is because of militia which means weapons usuable by the military and the Supreme court agrees the 39 case stated a weapon must be of use in use or previously used by the military to be protected.
one reason is you said you supported the 2nd A and then you said it should be violated in favor of the government against the people,,I read the Constitution all the time and get emails from a website about it and cases / test. And I don't ever remember reading that !
Why are all you guys pile'n on me ? You sound like the far left when you talk about regulating ABs...more.
I have a "bell gun" and a shotgun...personally that is all I need.
The Los Angeles Koreans who defended their homes and businesses from the rioters would disagree with you.You don't need high capacity mags and an extreme rate of fire to protect your home. The fact remains, a shotgun does a wonderful job and, trust me on this one, the jacking of a shotgun shell into a chamber really makes anyone up to no good to consider making his peace with Jesus.
I find your comment highly doubtful. The ruling in US v Miller is well known, as is their reasoning to outlaw the sawed off shotgun because they could not envision them having "any forseeable military purpose".I read the Constitution all the time and get emails from a website about it and cases / test. And I don't ever remember reading that !
Why are all you guys pile'n on me ? You sound like the far left when you talk about regulating ABs...more.
I have a "bell gun" and a shotgun...personally that is all I need.
Read:I read the Constitution all the time and get emails from a website about it and cases / test. And I don't ever remember reading that !
But the constitution protects my right to them.You don't need high capacity mags and an extreme rate of fire to protect your home.
An AR/AK carbine / pistol in 9mm/40/45/10mm is better than a shotgun for most home defense situations.The fact remains, a shotgun does a wonderful job...
IMHO...if the GOV says you can only have a one shot at a time...they have fulfilled their obligation to the 2nd Amen.
No where does it say you can have a extended MAG.
No where does it say you don't have to pay a Poll Tax and pass a Literacy test to vote.....
The police have no legal responsibility to defend you. their legal responsibility is to defend society at large from criminals. If you can't or are unwilling to defend yourself, you are a victim in waiting for any criminal who wants to harvest you or your goods.I support the 2nd Amend but I am also all for sensible guns.
I think only LEO should have that stuff...it is not practical for target shooting and if you need that bullets; you need the police more.
They always have been. Pirates took legal weapons from their victims to arm their ships, criminals have always stripped weapons form their armed victims.I don't know what to say other than those items have become tools of nuts and thugs...way to much.
Your opinion is wrong, but you are entitled to it. DON'T apply your OPINION to me.IMHO...if the GOV says you can only have a one shot at a time...they have fulfilled their obligation to the 2nd Amen.
No where does it say you can have a extended MAG.
Don't try to ENFORCE his opinion on us, is what you meant to say.Your opinion is wrong, but you are entitled to it. DON'T apply your OPINION to me.
No I don't want his opinion even applied to me, let alone enforced which is what he would like to do.Don't try to ENFORCE his opinion on us, is what you meant to say.
Actually if you're a good marksman you don't even need that. All it takes is one bullet in the right place.Do you really need another reason?
Wrong again tojo. There are multiple cases where bad guys have been shot multiple times, all critical wounds, and they keep on fighting.Actually if you're a good marksman you don't even need that. All it takes is one bullet in the right place.
