Police Scanner...All Hell Breaking Loose in Ferguson!!!

Looting has started.

35bd16x.png
 
All this because a white officer defended himself. If I was the chief of police I'd pull all my officers off the street for a week.

See how these assholes need us.

A white man defended himself against an unarmed black kid. LOL.
 
That unarmed black kid was huge. I woulda shot him full of holes too, if he came running at me.
 
"The midnight curfew is now in effect in #Ferguson. Last night, 7 were arrested after curfew. County police told us not one was from Ferguson" -@RobertDEdwards
 
He did go overboard with shooting him. That I agree with.

4 of the shots were in his arm...He was shot in the head twice and all at far range sounds like he was rushing toward the officer. It pretty much proves he wasn't shot in the back with his hands up and he wasn't shot "struggling" for the officers gun!
 
A cop with a gun has the upper hand. He didn't have to shoot.

So what is he supposed to do? Run? Pahlease.

Not shoot about half a dozen times, that is for sure.

Read this and see if you want to revise your assessment of the situation.

A previously unnoticed detail in a background conversion of a video taken minutes after the Ferguson shooting could change the course of the investigation into Mike Brown’s death.

The original video poster appears sympathetic to the narrative that Mike Brown was shot unarmed with his hands in the air. But he unknowingly picks up conversation between a man who saw the altercation and another neighbor.

An approximate transcription of the background conversation, as related by the “Conservative Treehouse ” blog, who originally discovered the conversation:
@6:28/6:29 of video

#1 How’d he get from there to there?
#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck
{crosstalk}
#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him
{crosstalk}
#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –
[there is dispute here whether he says "doubled back" or "coming back."]
#1. Oh, the police got his gun
#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him
{crosstalk}
#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing
#1 The Police?
#2 The Police shot him
#1 Police?
#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)

This is terribly important because if Mike Brown had been shot, and he advanced towards the cop instead of surrendering, it would substantiate the narrative that the policeman shot in self-defense due to the fact that he was being threatened with severe bodily harm. This corroborates an account of the event given by a friend of Officer Darren Wilson:

Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And, Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So, he stands up and yells, “Freeze!” Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. And, he just kept coming. And, so he really thinks he was on something.”​

It’s far too unlikely that these two accounts are similar accidentally, having been from such disparate sources. The apparent witness in the background conversation is speaking with detail about the tragic shooting, and in a manner that runs contrary to the widespread version. Those who watch the video need to judge for themselves if the witness sounds reliable (but he would seemingly have nothing to gain by telling such a story.)

A third piece of the puzzle would be the toxicology report. If there happens to be anything found that might explain how Mike Brown might have been shot and kept advancing toward the officer, then the defense becomes even more believable. Unless someone is emotionally invested in an alternative narrative to the extent that one might ignore plain facts.

A Witness Conversation Unknowingly Captured at the Scene of the Ferguson Shooting is a Game-Changer
 
BREAKING

CNN just said the Gov has signed an order for the NATIONAL GAURD to go in!!!!!

Good. Maybe they can do something so innocent people can be safe in their own homes and businesses without fear of some thugs making them pay for another thugs idiocy.

With that said..this whole thing has pissed me off enough to be thinking and acting like I normally don't. So....Ferguson and it's lowlifes can suck ass and I hope they get worse than they have dished out.

/unsub
 
Wow, all hell breaking loose!!!!!


BUT BUT BUT........the MOST important thing to remember...........make sure the men we are tasking with going into that chaos to restore order....are NOT wearing camo pants and carrying big guns.

We're gonna need them to wear khaki pants, polo shirts, carry 6-shooter revolvers, and drive a nice Dodge Stratus into the hotzone please.

We want riot control and all....but looking tactical while doing so is just SOOOOO offensive.
 
They don't NEED the National Guard. But, they are doing it because for some damn reason, people are OK with THOSE men with guns in camo....but not THESE men with guns and camo. Just bizarre thinking.

A man with camo and a big ass gun....is the same no matter who signs his check.

That said....God Bless the cops and soon-to-be-arriving Guard troops who are willing to go into that shithole and try to restore order.
 

Forum List

Back
Top