🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Politicians in sanctuary cities / states - 'We must offer sanctuary so illegals will report crime but we need to defund the police.'....WTF?

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
40,418
22,720
2,615
MEXIFORNIA
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
 
After reading the link, Jesus Christ they are going for complete chaios

You get in a car crash and they won't send a cop now? You could be high or drunk as heck and get away with it
 
After reading the link, Jesus Christ they are going for complete chaios

You get in a car crash and they won't send a cop now? You could be high or drunk as heck and get away with it

Democrat strongholds have always been the most dangerous places in America.

I think it's about to get exponentially more so.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?

Not at all. Crime rates are all dropping. As municipal budgets have dropped for every type of government agency, police budgets have been rising. But police officers raises and promotions are based on the numbers of tickets they issue and their arrests and convictions. What this has created is a scenario where more and more police officers are chasing fewer and fewer criminals.

Notice how all of these police killings of unarmed blacks always involve 4 or 6 cops on one unarmed man, and a crime so petty it's unbelievable the police are devoting this level of resources to it. Eric Garner - 6 cops to deal with a crime of selling cigarettes on the corner. 4 cops to investigate a counterfeit $20 bill in the George Floyd case. Michael Brown was killed over a chocolate bar. And that poor man whose car broke down on the highway, about a half a dozen cops were involved in his murder.

When families are dealing with mental health problems, their loved ones need to be subdued and taken to hospital. Not wrestled to the ground and smothered until they stop breathing. Armed police should be not sent out on such calls. And they shouldn't be demanding paramedics dispense drugs to their victims.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

All those programs accomplish is to keep the criminal element and the whack-jobs on the streets.

"Ignorance is strength." is not a good life model.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?

Not at all. Crime rates are all dropping. As municipal budgets have dropped for every type of government agency, police budgets have been rising. But police officers raises and promotions are based on the numbers of tickets they issue and their arrests and convictions. What this has created is a scenario where more and more police officers are chasing fewer and fewer criminals.

Notice how all of these police killings of unarmed blacks always involve 4 or 6 cops on one unarmed man, and a crime so petty it's unbelievable the police are devoting this level of resources to it. Eric Garner - 6 cops to deal with a crime of selling cigarettes on the corner. 4 cops to investigate a counterfeit $20 bill in the George Floyd case. Michael Brown was killed over a chocolate bar. And that poor man whose car broke down on the highway, about a half a dozen cops were involved in his murder.

When families are dealing with mental health problems, their loved ones need to be subdued and taken to hospital. Not wrestled to the ground and smothered until they stop breathing. Armed police should be not sent out on such calls. And they shouldn't be demanding paramedics dispense drugs to their victims.


"Crime rates" are based upon the number of crimes reported- not committed. If people see that it is pointless to report a crime, they won't do it. If the police avoid crime scenes because they don't want to mess with BLM thugs and face possible criminal charges, the citizens won't have an opportunity to report a crime.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

All those programs accomplish is to keep the criminal element and the whack-jobs on the streets.

"Ignorance is strength." is not a good life model.

There is little criminal element on the street. Whack jobs are kept on the streets by a lack of health insurance and no universal single payer care.

"Ignorance is strength" is the motto on your family coat of arms.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

All those programs accomplish is to keep the criminal element and the whack-jobs on the streets.

"Ignorance is strength." is not a good life model.

There is little criminal element on the street. Whack jobs are kept on the streets by a lack of health insurance and no universal single payer care.

"Ignorance is strength" is the motto on your family coat of arms.


There is a huge criminal element, especially in the huge, failed cities. Legions of drug pushers, pimps, hoes, armed robbers, rapists out there. Most of your criminals are covered by medicaid. No visible means of support, they just ask for, and have, the taxpayers pick up their medical bills.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?

Not at all. Crime rates are all dropping. As municipal budgets have dropped for every type of government agency, police budgets have been rising. But police officers raises and promotions are based on the numbers of tickets they issue and their arrests and convictions. What this has created is a scenario where more and more police officers are chasing fewer and fewer criminals.

Notice how all of these police killings of unarmed blacks always involve 4 or 6 cops on one unarmed man, and a crime so petty it's unbelievable the police are devoting this level of resources to it. Eric Garner - 6 cops to deal with a crime of selling cigarettes on the corner. 4 cops to investigate a counterfeit $20 bill in the George Floyd case. Michael Brown was killed over a chocolate bar. And that poor man whose car broke down on the highway, about a half a dozen cops were involved in his murder.

When families are dealing with mental health problems, their loved ones need to be subdued and taken to hospital. Not wrestled to the ground and smothered until they stop breathing. Armed police should be not sent out on such calls. And they shouldn't be demanding paramedics dispense drugs to their victims.
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

Cool, let’s go with that retarded bullshit...
So you’re ready to revoke the sanctuary status then...right?
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

1608179763155.png


Yes I can see how sending an unarmed social worker into a possibly highly volatile situation will work out well for the social worker.

*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
Last edited:
That's nothing, Joe Biden said "we owe" illegals this free shit Democrats are promising them. There you have it American tax payers are indebted to f'ing illegals so says the next POTUS

Biden will strike out on this one as the majority of Americans want illegals out of America. We already spend billions on their illegal asses. In fact tax payers will be sick of the Biden/Harris shit show if dumbass does what he says he will do.
 
Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?
More bizarre contradictory philosophy from Demorcats....OR were they lying along?
“Doesn't defunding the police mean less crime will be addressed and fewer cases will be solved?”

No.

In fact, it will help facilitate more crime being addressed and increase cases being solved.

By investing in social service programs, mental health programs, and addressing the problems related to homelessness, police officers can stop being social workers and mental health counselors and focus instead on combating crime.

All those programs accomplish is to keep the criminal element and the whack-jobs on the streets.

"Ignorance is strength." is not a good life model.

There is little criminal element on the street. Whack jobs are kept on the streets by a lack of health insurance and no universal single payer care.

"Ignorance is strength" is the motto on your family coat of arms.
"whack jobs" are kept on the street because society can't forcibly incarcerate them in mental institutions anymore. Since they are rarely, if ever, gainfully employed Medicaid covers all their medical expenses. So they DO have singlepayer (taxpayer) paid medical coverage.
 

Forum List

Back
Top