Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

Court of public opinion

Court of law

Dave, you got rabid and fell on your face again
It'd be awesome if someday, for once in your life, you could take responsibility for your mistakes.

d754fbcefc60b04a7510e20e8f29df27.jpg
 
It'd be awesome if someday, for once in your life, you could take responsibility for your mistakes.

d754fbcefc60b04a7510e20e8f29df27.jpg
I didn't make any.

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law simple does not apply in the court of public opinion.

It's the sole reason you are having this embarrassing tantrum.
 
Last edited:
Moving on from the squirming fool....

Not one Trumper has been able to.present a single defense against a single criminal charge.

Not one.

Nor has anyone been able to debunk any statement of fact from the indictment.

Not one.

So naturally, these tantrums are what we see.
 
In other words, politics.

You must be new to this.



Voting is due process.

A criminal case proceeding to trial is due process.

You don't have a leg to stand on, here.



So what? Blame the orange rapist charity thief for going on crime sprees.

Your jealousy is not well hidden.

In other words, politics.

You must be new to this.m
Name another candidate who they said, before they were elected, that they were going to impeach them, and go after them. Name another candidate who has the opposing party hound them for 9 years, and use lawfare against them to hinder their candidacy.

What has happened to trump truly is unprecedented.

Voting is due process.

It’s not due process of law. The people don’t get to decide who is innocent or guilty under law, only the courts can. That why what Chutkan did was wrong. She wasn’t interested in due process of law, she was only interested in public opinion.

You don't have a leg to stand on, here

That would be you who doesn’t have a leg to stand on. You know what her goal was, though you don’t dare admit it.


So what? Blame the orange rapist charity thief for going on crime sprees.

What does that have to do with this case? Nothing….
 
Name another candidate who they said, before they were elected, that they were going to impeach them, and go after them.
Who said that, specifically? Did you forget you were making a case about all democrats?

Another weasel half truth.

Name another candidate who has the opposing party hound them for 9 years, and use lawfare against them to hinder their candidacy.
I don't have to acknowledge or account for your lies, sorry. You always forget this simple principle.

Your word was "unfair".

Now argue what is unfair about the criminal cases. You often forget what your own assertions were, minutes later.

And, go.


See you in never. You're not going to succeed where Trump's 8-figure cost legal team has utterly failed.

By the way, that's two points you tried to make, resulting in two instance of me having to remind you of your own words from just minutes ago. This is your typical, bad faith posting.
 

Forum List

Back
Top