"privately describing some of the claims of election fraud as "crazy,"

[Lisa558]

I expect the election will come down to PA, where the Dems will say they need more time to count ballots until they can dredge up enough Democrat ones to take the state.

And I bet the SCOTUS will take the case this time.

 

[berg80]

View attachment 1021743

Yet another creation of right wing media swallowed whole by the rubes.

City officials and residents say there is no Venezuelan gang “takeover” in Aurora, Colorado​

Claims spread about migrant gang activity in Colorado

Surveillance video showing what appears to be a group of Spanish-speaking armed men entering an Aurora, Colorado, apartm

www.politifact.com

 

[berg80]

I expect the election will come down to PA, where the Dems will say they need more time to count ballots until they can dredge up enough Democrat ones to take the state.

And I bet the SCOTUS will take the case this time.

The US does not have a problem with voter fraud. It has a problem with those liars who insist it does.

 

[berg80]

This just sounds like the judge allowed to be published the charges Smith is alleging, without the defense’s rebuttal to them - which of course hasn’t happened yet.

More nasty politics from the Dems.

When the defendant lost the 2020 presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try to stay in office. With private co-conspirators, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in seven states that he had lost—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (the “targeted states”). His efforts included lying to state officials in order to induce them to ignore true vote counts; manufacturing fraudulent electoral votes in the targeted states; attempting to enlist Vice President Michael R. Pence, in his role as President of the Senate, to obstruct Congress’s certification of the election by using the defendant’s fraudulent electoral votes; and when all else had failed, on January 6, 2021, directing an angry crowd of supporters to the United States Capitol to obstruct the congressional certification. The through line of these efforts was deceit: the defendant’s and co-conspirators’ knowingly false claims of election fraud.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf

 

[berg80]

The whole “filing” is complete nonsense. They are trying to argue Trump has a “criminal state of mind”. In other words they have zero evidence of any actual crime and just want to convict him because of his opinions.



.


View attachment 1021401

Turn to page 7.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf

 

[ColonelAngus]

Which case was it where the evidence was reviewed and the judge determined there was no fraud?

 

[Lisa558]

Which case was it where the evidence was reviewed and the judge determined there was no fraud?

Here’s the thing: The majority of the justices decided not to hear the case because they thought the upheaval and chaos created by revealing just how extensive the Democrat cheating apparatus was that it was better to just let Biden take the presidency.

But other than the 3 leftists, the others know that a Harris presidency would be MORE damaging than revealing how the Democrats suppress the will of the people. I predict that if it comes down to PA, and they claim it will take a week or more to count ballots - once they know how many they need to overcome Trump’s lead - the SCOTUS will step in.

There is no reason to halt the count at midnight while they truck in Harris-marked ballots if they know they have a week to do so after the election.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Here’s the thing: The majority of the justices decided not to hear the case because they thought the upheaval and chaos created by revealing just how extensive the Democrat cheating apparatus was that it was better to just let Biden take the presidency.

But other than the 3 leftists, the others know that a Harris presidency would be MORE damaging than revealing how the Democrats suppress the will of the people. I predict that if it comes down to PA, and they claim it will take a week or more to count ballots - once they know how many they need to overcome Trump’s lead - the SCOTUS will step in.

There is no reason to halt the count at midnight while they truck in Harris-marked ballots if they know they have a week to do so after the election.

We have a winner!

There has not been a case where all the evidence of fraud was presented and adjudicated.

There was always a dismissal prior to evidence.

As always, the left wing cult fucks lie.

 

[Faun]

We have a winner!

There has not been a case where all the evidence of fraud was presented and adjudicated.

There was always a dismissal prior to evidence.

As always, the left wing cult fucks lie.

In some cases, dismissed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit.

 

[ColonelAngus]

In some cases, dismissed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit.

You are nothing but the echo of the voices of your thoughtmasters. You have no mind of your own.

Left wing cult fucks refuse to remove dead people from voter rolls or make someone show ID to vote because THEY CHEAT.

 

[Lisa558]

We have a winner!

There has not been a case where all the evidence of fraud was presented and adjudicated.

There was always a dismissal prior to evidence.

As always, the left wing cult fucks lie.

Thank you.

It seems most people don’t remember, but at the Amy Coney Barrett hearing, she was asked whether the impact on America of taking a case could enter into the decision to take or decide a case. She said “yes.”

This is what happened when they decided to just let Biden ascend the throne. They didn’t realize how damaging his policies would be to the country at the time, but now that they see what happens when you block the will of the people and let an incompetent person, or one who places the interests of foreigners ahead of Americans, take over the presidency, they will not let a questionable election proceed without hearing the evidence.

People like Kavanaugh and Barrett will side with Thomas and Alito (the two who wanted to hear the case), and there you have it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I expect the election will come down to PA, where the Dems will say they need more time to count ballots until they can dredge up enough Democrat ones to take the state.

And I bet the SCOTUS will take the case this time.

PA is the lynchpin.

Expect MASSIVE FRAUD in Philly. Defintiely delays for the Dems to figure out how many votes they need to stuff.

 

[Faun]

You are nothing but the echo of the voices of your thoughtmasters. You have no mind of your own.

Left wing cult fucks refuse to remove dead people from voter rolls or make someone show ID to vote because THEY CHEAT.

Aww, you poor nut.

Here's an example...

Nevada Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Trump lawsuit to overturn Nevada election result

Documents filed Monday ask the high court to reverse Judge James Todd Russell's finding on Friday that the legal team for six Republican electors failed to prove the Nov. 3 election was swayed by fraudulent or illegal votes.

www.rgj.com

"Contestants' claims fail on the merits ... or under any other standard," the judge said in his 35-page ruling.​

... so then the plaintiff filed an appeal... ALL 6 Justices ruled unanimously against them and upheld the lower court's ruling.

“To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court,” the six justices said. “We are not convinced they have done so.”​

That's 7 judges in 2 courts ALL reaching the same conclusion... the plaintiff's evidence failed to demonstrate fraud.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anyone? Link to the case where all the evidence was presented and a judge or jury determined there was no fraud after reviewing the evidende.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Aww, you poor nut.

Here's an example...

Nevada Supreme Court unanimously dismisses Trump lawsuit to overturn Nevada election result

Documents filed Monday ask the high court to reverse Judge James Todd Russell's finding on Friday that the legal team for six Republican electors failed to prove the Nov. 3 election was swayed by fraudulent or illegal votes.

www.rgj.com

"Contestants' claims fail on the merits ... or under any other standard," the judge said in his 35-page ruling.​

... so then the plaintiff filed an appeal... ALL 6 Justices ruled unanimously against them and upheld the lower court's ruling.

“To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court,” the six justices said. “We are not convinced they have done so.”​

That's 7 judges in 2 courts ALL reaching the same conclusion... the plaintiff's evidence failed to demonstrate fraud.

Dismissed, not a case brought to a decision.

You sem unable to grasp this concept.

The evidence was not reviewed in total and determined there was no fraud.

Why do Dems not want dead people off voter rolls? Why no ID to vote? Why do Dems want illegals to vote?

 

[berg80]

The majority of the justices decided not to hear the case because they thought the upheaval and chaos created by revealing just how extensive the Democrat cheating apparatus was that it was better to just let Biden take the presidency.

You become completely detached from reality.

 

[Faun]

Dismissed, not a case brought to a decision.

You sem unable to grasp this concept.

The evidence was not reviewed in total and determined there was no fraud.

Why do Dems not want dead people off voter rolls? Why no ID to vote? Why do Dems want illegals to vote?

I didn't say it went to a decision. Try reading for clarity. I said some cases were dismissed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit. Such cases shouldn't make it to a decision.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Why do Dems want illegals to vote? Why no ID? Why are dead people intentionally kept on voter rolls?

No good answers….we know why. So do commies.