Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

Do you support the "violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"?

  • I'm a GOP voter and NO I do NOT support the attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 35 33.3%
  • I'm a GOP voter and YES I do support the attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 11 10.5%
  • I'm a democrat and I condemn the 1/6 attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 22 21.0%
  • Other, see my post

    Votes: 37 35.2%

  • Total voters
    105
But believed she was righteous.
The tyranny of a soft brain
she was doing what she fought for her rights to do as a soldier. Liberty! She didn't need to die as an unarmed civilian, especially after fighting in Harm's way as a soldier. Disgraceful.
It's true that she didn't have to die a traitor like she did. Too bad she chose to commit suicide by cop.
 
I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?
Do you believe cops should be able to gun down people in cold blood because they are crawling through a window?
As part of a violent overwhelming mob to get at members of Congress in order to prevent them from performing their constitutional duties of certifying an election they idiotically believe was stolen from them?

Absofuckinglutely.
Spewing obvious horseshit doesn't improve your credibilty
LOLOL

Thankfully, the retards recorded themselves. It's all on video, fucking moron. You appear dumber than ever denying what the whole world witnessed.
You must be doing drugs. There's no "recording" that shows what you claim.
:cuckoo:
<YAWN!>
Save exercising your mouth muscles for your boyfriend, fucking moron.
 
it seems clear he supports Capitol police officers being beat with a metal pole flying that American flag?
something that never happened. fake news.
LOLOL

It cracks me up to see you rightards are sooo mentally deranged, you even deny what's been captured on video.

Peter-Stager.jpg
More...​
You can't determine what is happening in that photo, turd.
 
But believed she was righteous.
The tyranny of a soft brain
she was doing what she fought for her rights to do as a soldier. Liberty! She didn't need to die as an unarmed civilian, especially after fighting in Harm's way as a soldier. Disgraceful.
It's true that she didn't have to die a traitor like she did. Too bad she chose to commit suicide by cop.
It's too bad your brain transplant was a failure.
 
it seems clear he supports Capitol police officers being beat with a metal pole flying that American flag?
something that never happened. fake news.
LOLOL

It cracks me up to see you rightards are sooo mentally deranged, you even deny what's been captured on video.

Peter-Stager.jpg
More...​
You can't determine what is happening in that photo, turd.
It's on video, ya fucking moron. He (and others) beat that cop who was begging for his life until the cop fell unconscious.

I would say it's disturbing how you deny even what's plainly visible, but then, you are mentally deranged and certifiably insane; so there's that.
 
An Armed Insurrection must actually have armed people preforming the act of overthrowing the Government. The rioters were not armed and they had no possibility of overthrowing the US Government by their actions.
Dumbfuck, show me where the definition of "insurrection" means "overthrowing the government"

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
By that definition every damn blm riot was an insurrection,
 
...
I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.
Agreed. At about 6' from the target anyone competent to use a pistol should have been able to put one in her shoulder instead of her heart.
At the very least that was manslaughter.
She was shot in the shoulder from what I have read on it?


Babbitt was shot once in the shoulder by an unidentified Capitol police lieutenant while attempting to crawl through a broken window leading to the Speaker's Lobby outside the US House of Representatives' chamber. The shooting was captured on video and went viral for the world to see. The lieutenant has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing
.

 
An Armed Insurrection must actually have armed people preforming the act of overthrowing the Government. The rioters were not armed and they had no possibility of overthrowing the US Government by their actions.
Dumbfuck, show me where the definition of "insurrection" means "overthrowing the government"

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
By that definition every damn blm riot was an insurrection,
but_blm-png.439534
 
An Armed Insurrection must actually have armed people preforming the act of overthrowing the Government. The rioters were not armed and they had no possibility of overthrowing the US Government by their actions.
Dumbfuck, show me where the definition of "insurrection" means "overthrowing the government"

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
By that definition every damn blm riot was an insurrection,
but_blm-png.439534
it is either insurrection ot=r it isn't you dont get to ignore 12 months of riots to fixate on one single event.
 
An Armed Insurrection must actually have armed people preforming the act of overthrowing the Government. The rioters were not armed and they had no possibility of overthrowing the US Government by their actions.
Dumbfuck, show me where the definition of "insurrection" means "overthrowing the government"

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
By that definition every damn blm riot was an insurrection,
but_blm-png.439534
it is either insurrection ot=r it isn't you dont get to ignore 12 months of riots to fixate on one single event.
LOLOL

Or.... maybe you're just an idiot who doesn't understand what insurrection means. As evidenced by it being necessary for the definition to be shown to you.
 
Am independent in my vote, the best person not my preferred political party. the attack was just plan crazy. look at the level of intelligent thought of those who attacked Our capital building.
 
She was shot in the shoulder from what I have read on it?


Babbitt was shot once in the shoulder by an unidentified Capitol police lieutenant while attempting to crawl through a broken window leading to the Speaker's Lobby outside the US House of Representatives' chamber. The shooting was captured on video and went viral for the world to see. The lieutenant has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing.


Babbitt, an unarmed, petite, white, female, military veteran and US citizen was shot and killed by a police officer who either shot blindly, indiscriminately into a crowd or who who chose his target and intentionally shot this unarmed citizen who posed no serious threat, as she had several officers directly behind her.

One tactic used by those on the left is to attempt to drag the conversation down into the microscopic weeds, to focus discussion on 'red versus blue' minutia that does not matter rather than focus on the big picture.

Whwre exactly Babbitt was shot does not matter. What matters is that Capitol Police chose to use lethal force against an unarmed female guilty of trespassing in the Capitol.
 
She was shot in the shoulder from what I have read on it?


Babbitt was shot once in the shoulder by an unidentified Capitol police lieutenant while attempting to crawl through a broken window leading to the Speaker's Lobby outside the US House of Representatives' chamber. The shooting was captured on video and went viral for the world to see. The lieutenant has been cleared of criminal wrongdoing.


Babbitt, an unarmed, petite, white, female, military veteran and US citizen was shot and killed by a police officer who either shot blindly, indiscriminately into a crowd or who who chose his target and intentionally shot this unarmed citizen who posed no serious threat, as she had several officers directly behind her.

One tactic used by those on the left is to attempt to drag the conversation down into the microscopic weeds, to focus discussion on 'red versus blue' minutia that does not matter rather than focus on the big picture.

Whwre exactly Babbitt was shot does not matter. What matters is that Capitol Police chose to use lethal force against an unarmed female guilty of trespassing in the Capitol.
:cuckoo:
 
still defending blm by your chosen definition every riot against a city state or fed is an insurrection. Pretty simple concept actually.
Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.
Protesting for equal rights under the law is not.

Being dumb is a choice. Choose better.
 
To prove a point, we need to clarify how many GOP posters support the "violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6/21".
As opposed to the many of us who supported the 1/6 protest, but NOT the attack on the Capital Building and the threats to Mike Pence and the injuries and deaths and property damage.

Please vote in the poll honestly.
You’re not asking the right question.

my vote….

Not a democrat. Oppose the atrack
 
Armed means with guns
So, prevent I'm coming at you with a baseball bat.

Am I unarmed?
View attachment 503691

Unarmed people according to kyzr.
The 1/6 protesters were unarmed, i.e. no guns.
Ashli Babbitt was unarmed when she was shot in the neck by a black guy wearing a mask.
They were armed. Bear spray, flag poles, knives and other hand held weapons. They also took tasers from the police and used them.

Stop lying.
Compare those "weapons" to guns. You are lying saying that they were armed.
As soon as the SWAT teams showed up with ARs the party was over. No contest. No insurrection.

What did I lie about?

Sure, the insurrectionists had only been ripping up and shitting (literally) in the Capital for hours and yeah, their courage came in crowd form and when finally challenged by a deadly force they left.

Why are you defending them?
I'm not defending the rioters. I'm defending the insurrection charge.

You claimed they weren't armed. They were, you just don't like the definition. You're downplaying how dangerous a mob they were.
It was NOT an insurrection, which by definition requires the insurrectionists to be armed.

Nope, that's not true. The definition of an insurrection has nothing to do with being armed or not.
The lie I'm saying you made is saying that the rioters were "armed".

They were. Carrying weapons is called being armed. bear mace, knives, clubs, flagpoles, stolen tasers. They were armed.

They did not all have guns. as would be needed to have a real insurrection.

Some did, they were caught outside but being armed simply means carrying weapons. That's more than just firearms.

They trespassed, they got arrested, they were NOT charged with insurrection, QED.

Almost no one in our history has ever been charged with insurrection, even during insurrections.
ok, looks like we're going to agree to disagree.
1. The rioters had no intention of overthrowing the US government and taking over, i.e. an insurrection. They were unarmed, protesting voter fraud, and a stolen election.

What are you talking about? Of course they did. They were trying to delay and/or stop the peaceful transition of power by force. They threatened to hang Pence because his role was to oversee the certification of electoral votes.

2. I showed you a definition that had the word armed. You showed me one that had "open revolt", I like mine better.
I showed you one that didn't, so what? They were armed anyway so I'm not sure exactly what point you're trying to make other than demonstrate you also aren't familiar with the definition of 'armed'.

3. A few having primitive weapons when the SWAT teams had ARs and the Capital Police had pistols is not apples to apples viz weapons needed for an insurrection.
So, according to you each side has to have an equal amount of force in order for an insurrection to be called an insurrection? Again, why are you making shit up to defend these idiots?

4. I disagree that it was an armed insurrection. If it was, why weren't the trespassers charged with insurrection? Got you there. QED.

Already answered, rarely has anybody in our history been charged with insurrection, even during an insurrection.

5. Bullshit by any other name. It was not an insurrection because there were no insurrection charges, period. The FBI were the ones who instigated the Capital riot anyway.

That's made up.

I don't have time for this today, but I had to respond.
 
What are you talking about? Of course they did. They were trying to delay and/or stop the peaceful transition of power by force. They threatened to hang Pence because his role was to oversee the certification of electoral votes.
disagree,
 

Forum List

Back
Top