Poll: What should we do with guns?

[bigrebnc1775]

That is your wrongful misinterpretation of SCOTUS opinions.

Otherwise, you could stroll into Dick's Sporting Goods and pick up a mortar section, shells, plates, gears, and tools. Can you?

I have every right to tell you the court decides not you, bigrebnc.

You don't like, tuff.

You have the right but I don't?
You have the right just as I do. but what you do is misinform
I gave the facts with Lewis and Miller you cannot show any evidence to debunk those court rulings.

321................................................
Jake response blather blather blather.

I cut and paste the exact words from the rulings those are not my interpretation but the courts.
5......4......3.....2.............

 

[JakeStarkey]

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Talking about being delusional when I say I cut and paste the courts rulings it's their interpretation not mine and jakes only come back is this^^^^^^^^^^^ Seems since jake can't make a point he's failed.

 

[GuyPinestra]

3million Americans, 2million guns

what does anyone expect there CAN be done?

~S~

I think it's 330 million Americans and 270 million guns, or thereabouts.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

3million Americans, 2million guns

what does anyone expect there CAN be done?

~S~

I think it's 330 million Americans and 270 million guns, or thereabouts.

I think those numbers have went up drastically since obama's re-election.

 

[JakeStarkey]

It's the ruling out of context, and controverted by Heller 1(F). You know it.

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Talking about being delusional when I say I cut and paste the courts rulings it's their interpretation not mine and jakes only come back is this^^^^^^^^^^^ Seems since jake can't make a point he's failed.

 

[GuyPinestra]

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Jake, are the Court's own word not good enough?

Quit while you're behind, kid...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Jake, are the Court's own word not good enough?

Quit while you're behind, kid...

He's a liberal that is more delusional than truth don't matter is.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The words are out of context for what he is insinuating. And Heller and the next ruling will put the far right's militia-weapons' theory down forever.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's the ruling out of context, and controverted by Heller 1(F). You know it.

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Talking about being delusional when I say I cut and paste the courts rulings it's their interpretation not mine and jakes only come back is this^^^^^^^^^^^ Seems since jake can't make a point he's failed.

Jeeeeezus flocking Christ son nothing has been taken out of context.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Will be put down forever.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The words are out of context for what he is insinuating. And Heller and the next ruling will put the far right's militia-weapons' theory down forever.

No they aren't out of context.
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
.......The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time......

 

[JakeStarkey]

A mere historical narrative of militia, which does not apply today, and is invalidated by the power of Heller 1(F), which permits the legislature to restrict certain types of weapons to civilians.

End of story. No mortar for you son.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

A mere historical narrative of militia, which does not apply today, and is invalidated by the power of Heller 1(F), which permits the legislature to restrict certain types of weapons to civilians.

End of story. No mortar for you son.

Miller is dealing with FIREARMS not mortars FAIL

 

[JakeStarkey]

And that is why you can't go out in your civilian capacity and buy mortars.

Move along, bigreb.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And that is why you can't go out in your civilian capacity and buy mortars.

Move along, bigreb.

Jake failed and now uses straw men to build his argument on.
Only you are talking about mortars.

 

[FA_Q2]

I see Jake ignored the fact that gun control laws are not effective in the first place. All this blatherng about passing gun controls is not going to positively affect anything at all and yet it will limit our freedoms. That is a piss poor excuse for a law.


Further, the courts have spoken and I note that you have not put that ruling 'in context' while you consistently demand that others are taking it out of context. The test is rather simple, banned weapons must both be dangerous AND unusual. Your mortar example (besides not even being an 'arm' in the first place) is both dangerous AND very unusual. Hence its legal banning. AR-15, M4, the bushmaster in question are all examples of very common arms and simply not legal to ban. If that is a misinterpretation then you are going to have to cite something that contradicts that in the most current court case.

I await for your insight on that (as well as facing the fact that more gun control laws are simply ineffective).

 

[JakeStarkey]

The point that you can't buy in your civilian capacity military weapons for private use as military weapons is the heart of the matter.

And that is why you can't go out in your civilian capacity and buy mortars.

Move along, bigreb.

Jake failed and now uses straw men to build his argument on.
Only you are talking about mortars.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The test is very simple, FAQ. Show me where I as a civilian in my private capacity can buy military weapons to use as such. Show me that vendor or store.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

It's the ruling out of context, and controverted by Heller 1(F). You know it.

In other words, no, you can't. End of discussion, bigreb fail again.

Talking about being delusional when I say I cut and paste the courts rulings it's their interpretation not mine and jakes only come back is this^^^^^^^^^^^ Seems since jake can't make a point he's failed.

How does Heller controvert the public use clause of the constitution?