Pollsters Dumbfounded by Trump

[Dad2three]

People think Trump is an anomaly because he doesn't hold 100% conservative principles, nor does he have much policy knowledge, preferring instead to engage in shallow tough talk .

His anti-illegal-alien ranting is designed to appeal to the crude nativism of a republican base that has no idea how much profit margins in sectors across places like California depend on the ultra low labor costs of illegal aliens. This is partly why Reagan passed the largest amnesty bill in history, so he could flood union controlled labor markets with cheap labor.

But republican voters tend not to understand that Trump is merely manipulating their uneducated sentiments.

Trump is also appealing to the strategically created anti-government feelings of the Republican base. This strategy is old, and it's based on the marketing of yourself as a straight-talking "outsider". This is the lifeblood of talk radio, which conditions the republican voter to hate the establishment. Goldwater started it, Reagan perfected it and Republicans always fall for it.

(Why do Republicans always buy into this clearly manufactured straight talking "outsider" image? When will they learn to question their politicians? When will they realize that they are being played?)

How ironic. Did you vote for the charlatan from Kenya?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Biden beats Trump by 8 points in the polls.

No one should be dumfounded over that.

 

[Dad2three]

Biden beats Trump by 8 points in the polls.

No one should be dumfounded over that.

Hillary by 6 over Trumpster, lol

 

[NYcarbineer]

Biden beats Trump by 8 points in the polls.

No one should be dumfounded over that.

Hillary by 6 over Trumpster, lol

The only two GOPers last I looked who had a national poll beating Hillary, ever,

were Bush and Rubio, interestingly,

the two WORST candidates in the eyes of the anti-Mexican Trumpbots.

 

[Meathead]

She's a dingbat, incapable of being educated let alone educating herself.

She is a leftist, and believes that she and other leftists of wealth and privilege are the rightful rulers of the little people. No doubt has and underwater basket weaving degree from an Ivy League, but couldn't create a balance sheet, org chart, or business plan to save her life.

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

Well, the GOP did have the greatest presidency of modern times without doubt. Dems not much since JFK. Now if the Clintons weren't quite as sleazy,...

 

[Dad2three]

She's a dingbat, incapable of being educated let alone educating herself.

She is a leftist, and believes that she and other leftists of wealth and privilege are the rightful rulers of the little people. No doubt has and underwater basket weaving degree from an Ivy League, but couldn't create a balance sheet, org chart, or business plan to save her life.

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

Well, the GOP did have the greatest presidency of modern times without doubt. Dems not much since JFK. Now if the Clintons weren't quite as sleazy,...

You mean the guy who gutted revenues AS he increased the tax burden on the middle class and GUTTED it for the "job creators" AS he tripled ALL previous US Prez debt? The guy who gutted the Constitution on Iran/Contra and lie to US? The guy who funded then cut and ran from the terrorists? The guy with the most corrupt admin EVER? The "pro life" guy who signed the most liberal abortion law in the land as Cali's Guv AND never fought for abortion restrictions? That guy?


Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing

Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing


Middle Class Series: The Failure of Supply-Side Economics




Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work




Investment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Productivity growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Overall economic growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Employment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Income growth for middle-class households was lackluster under supply-side policies

Hourly earnings were flat or declined under supply-side policies

Our nation’s fiscal health deteriorated under supply-side policies


Some of the more dedicated supply-side devotees go so far as to argue that tax cuts for the rich will result in so much additional economic activity that they will actually increase government revenues, thereby “paying for themselves,” and have no negative impact on the bottom line. This assertion, as with the others, is not supported in the data.

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

 

[Zander]

I suggest the thread title be truncated as follows to more accurately portray reality:

"Pollsters dumb"

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

What?

Are you drunk?

Non sequitur.

 

[g5000]

I don't think pollsters are dumbfounded by Trump so much as grateful for Trump.

 

[Uncensored2008]

She's a dingbat, incapable of being educated let alone educating herself.

She is a leftist, and believes that she and other leftists of wealth and privilege are the rightful rulers of the little people. No doubt has and underwater basket weaving degree from an Ivy League, but couldn't create a balance sheet, org chart, or business plan to save her life.

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

Well, the GOP did have the greatest presidency of modern times without doubt. Dems not much since JFK. Now if the Clintons weren't quite as sleazy,...

You mean the guy who gutted revenues AS he increased the tax burden on the middle class and GUTTED it for the "job creators" AS he tripled ALL previous US Prez debt? The guy who gutted the Constitution on Iran/Contra and lie to US? The guy who funded then cut and ran from the terrorists? The guy with the most corrupt admin EVER? The "pro life" guy who signed the most liberal abortion law in the land as Cali's Guv AND never fought for abortion restrictions? That guy?


Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing

Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing


Middle Class Series: The Failure of Supply-Side Economics




Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work




Investment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Productivity growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Overall economic growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Employment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Income growth for middle-class households was lackluster under supply-side policies

Hourly earnings were flat or declined under supply-side policies

Our nation’s fiscal health deteriorated under supply-side policies


Some of the more dedicated supply-side devotees go so far as to argue that tax cuts for the rich will result in so much additional economic activity that they will actually increase government revenues, thereby “paying for themselves,” and have no negative impact on the bottom line. This assertion, as with the others, is not supported in the data.

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Oh look, the same old hate site spam that's been refuted hundreds of times and has no relevance to the subject...

 

[Dad2three]

Trickle-down’s middle-class massacre: Failure of conservative economics should discredit these bankrupt ideas forever

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

What?

Are you drunk?

Non sequitur.

Thanks, how about ONE policy conservatives have EVER been on the correct side of US history? EVER

The current conservatives, GOPers, don't "believe in" Gov't or Gov't regulations/regulators so when they are in office, are we surprised the "free markets" hose US (like Harding/Cooolidge great depression, Ronnie's S&L and Dubya's subprime bubble)?

 

[Dad2three]

She's a dingbat, incapable of being educated let alone educating herself.

She is a leftist, and believes that she and other leftists of wealth and privilege are the rightful rulers of the little people. No doubt has and underwater basket weaving degree from an Ivy League, but couldn't create a balance sheet, org chart, or business plan to save her life.

Yeah, BECAUSE the GOP/CONservatives have such a fine history of governing US right? lol

Well, the GOP did have the greatest presidency of modern times without doubt. Dems not much since JFK. Now if the Clintons weren't quite as sleazy,...

You mean the guy who gutted revenues AS he increased the tax burden on the middle class and GUTTED it for the "job creators" AS he tripled ALL previous US Prez debt? The guy who gutted the Constitution on Iran/Contra and lie to US? The guy who funded then cut and ran from the terrorists? The guy with the most corrupt admin EVER? The "pro life" guy who signed the most liberal abortion law in the land as Cali's Guv AND never fought for abortion restrictions? That guy?


Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing

Obama Outperforms Reagan On Jobs, Growth And Investing


Middle Class Series: The Failure of Supply-Side Economics




Three Decades of Empirical Economic Data Shows That Supply-Side Economics Doesn’t Work




Investment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Productivity growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Overall economic growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Employment growth was weaker under supply-side policies

Income growth for middle-class households was lackluster under supply-side policies

Hourly earnings were flat or declined under supply-side policies

Our nation’s fiscal health deteriorated under supply-side policies


Some of the more dedicated supply-side devotees go so far as to argue that tax cuts for the rich will result in so much additional economic activity that they will actually increase government revenues, thereby “paying for themselves,” and have no negative impact on the bottom line. This assertion, as with the others, is not supported in the data.

The Failure of Supply-Side Economics

Oh look, the same old hate site spam that's been refuted hundreds of times ans has no relevance to the subject...

Should be EASY to refute it once more right Bubs? lol

 

[Uncensored2008]

Should be EASY to refute it once more right Bubs? lol

So, you're desperate to distract from the subject?

Nah, you just can't think. You can only paste hate memes and lack the intellect to grasp whether they are relevant or not...

 

[Meathead]

Sorry Daddy, no one's buying since not that many are working. Reagan bashed the Soviets with one hand a saved the economy with the other whie Obama's getting spanked by Putin while the economy is mushy at best.

There is no comparison. Reagan was a wolf in wolf's clothing and Obama is a sheep in sheep's clothing.

See, I didn't even say black sheep, knowing how sensitive you must be.

 

[Dad2three]

Sorry Daddy, no one's buying since not that many are working. Reagan bashed the Soviets with one hand a saved the economy with the other whie Obama's getting spanked by Putin while the economy is mushy at best.

There is no comparison. Reagan was a wolf in wolf's clothing and Obama is a sheep in sheep's clothing.

See, I didn't even say black sheep, knowing how sensitive you must be.

More right wing "history" lol


Reagan was a serial tax raiser on the middle class, ran the most CORRUPT admin in modern history, but in right wing world, ST Ronnie was CREATED

 

[Dad2three]

Should be EASY to refute it once more right Bubs? lol

So, you're desperate to distract from the subject?

Nah, you just can't think. You can only paste hate memes and lack the intellect to grasp whether they are relevant or not...

You inability to refute ANYTHING, ranks you right up on the top of the list of Trumpster supporters!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sorry Daddy, no one's buying since not that many are working. Reagan bashed the Soviets with one hand a saved the economy with the other whie Obama's getting spanked by Putin while the economy is mushy at best.

There is no comparison. Reagan was a wolf in wolf's clothing and Obama is a sheep in sheep's clothing.

See, I didn't even say black sheep, knowing how sensitive you must be.

If Reagan defeated the Soviets, why has Russia had thousands of missiles pointed at us ever since?

 

[Meathead]

Sorry Daddy, no one's buying since not that many are working. Reagan bashed the Soviets with one hand a saved the economy with the other whie Obama's getting spanked by Putin while the economy is mushy at best.

There is no comparison. Reagan was a wolf in wolf's clothing and Obama is a sheep in sheep's clothing.

See, I didn't even say black sheep, knowing how sensitive you must be.

If Reagan defeated the Soviets, why has Russia had thousands of missiles pointed at us ever since?

I guess pointing out the difference between the Soviets and the Russians would be wasted on you. Remember the Doomsday clock - idiot?

 

[Dad2three]

Sorry Daddy, no one's buying since not that many are working. Reagan bashed the Soviets with one hand a saved the economy with the other whie Obama's getting spanked by Putin while the economy is mushy at best.

There is no comparison. Reagan was a wolf in wolf's clothing and Obama is a sheep in sheep's clothing.

See, I didn't even say black sheep, knowing how sensitive you must be.

If Reagan defeated the Soviets, why has Russia had thousands of missiles pointed at us ever since?

I guess pointing out the difference between the Soviets and the Russians would be wasted on you. Remember the Doomsday clock - idiot?

Good dodge Bubs

Wasn't Putin part of the Soviet Empire? lol

 

[Esmeralda]

I don't think pollsters are dumbfounded by Trump so much as grateful for Trump.

I think anyone with any sense is dumbfounded by the Right Wing support Trump is getting. However, that support clarifies for us just how dumb the RW is.