Pope Francis' Encyclical On Climate Change Leaked...

Again.........matrix dwellers really don't have the knowledge to understand whats at play. They want to go and "solve the problem" using 20th century solutions: wind and solar. That thinking red flags a serious level of naïve. The big banks, which in 2015 set the market price on everything, make big money on current renewables and the fossil fuel industry. No incentive for them to encourage innovation. Its all about profit margins my friends............it has NOTHING to do with the science........unless you're a matrix dweller.

People who are dummies on current energy technologies need to wise up >> cryptogon.com

Our technology is 50 years ahead of what we know......................duh:coffee:
 
I just lost any respect for this pope and will never listen to anything from him again.

But what I find AMAZING. is all these people who didn't BELEIVE all of a sudden have now found RELIGION.

Phony hypocrites are the most dangerous of people


Do you disrespect all Christian leaders or just the Pope?
Have you given up on Christianity???


Eastern Orthodox, Anglican Spiritual Leaders Join Pope Francis Climate Change Appeal In New York Times Op-Ed

By Lora Moftah
June 19 2015

Religious leaders of different traditions are voicing their support for Pope Francis’ climate change stance following the release of the pontiff’s highly-anticipated environmental encyclical this week. On Friday, the spiritual heads of the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican churches jointly published an op-ed in the New York Times to argue that taking action on climate change was a moral responsibility, the latest sign that the issue is becoming an increasingly important one for many faith communities.

“Because of our faith in God as creator, redeemer and sustainer, we have a mission to protect nature as well as human beings,” wrote Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople and Justin Welby, archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Anglican Communion. “This is a shared moral responsibility and urgent requirement. Civil society, governmental authorities and religious leaders have an opportunity to make a difference in a way that bridges our diverse opinions and nationalities.”

Religious leaders of different traditions are voicing their support for Pope Francis’ climate change stance following the release of the pontiff’s highly-anticipated environmental encyclical this week. On Friday, the spiritual heads of the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican churches jointly published an op-ed in the New York Times to argue that taking action on climate change was a moral responsibility, the latest sign that the issue is becoming an increasingly important one for many faith communities.

<snip>

The leaders’ joint statement solidifies their individual stances into a united front on the issue that also reinforces one of the key features of Francis’ encyclical, namely the importance of an approach to tackling climate change that includes multiple denominations of Christianity.

<snip>
.
 
I just lost any respect for this pope and will never listen to anything from him again.

But what I find AMAZING. is all these people who didn't BELEIVE all of a sudden have now found RELIGION.

Phony hypocrites are the most dangerous of people
32424_thumb.jpg
 
Resolution on Global Warming - The United Methodist Church

Now therefore, be it resolved, that as a global church community, we call on our members to reduce human-related outputs of greenhouse gases;

Be it further resolved, that members should make an effort to learn about human production and release of greenhouse gases and evaluate their own lifestyles to identify areas where reductions in production and release of greenhouse gases can be made. There are many informative resources for learning how one can reduce his/her greenhouse-gas impact;

Be it further resolved, that members should also work to make their own congregations more aware of the issue of global warming and create policies and practices which reduce greenhouse gas emissions from congregational infrastructure (church buildings, parsonages, vehicles, etc.);

Be it further resolved, that members call on the nations of the world to require reductions in greenhouse emissions using the most efficient and cost-effective mechanisms;

Resolution from 2008, United Methodist Churchs.
 
Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Statement on Global Climate Change

In the case of CO2, substantial reduction of emissions means changing the energy basis of our whole civilization. We knew that fossil fuels would not last indefinitely; but suddenly the danger is that they will last too long, that the world will not make the transition soon enough to simpler, more efficient, and renewable energy sources and technologies.

In August 1989, the United Church of Canada and eight European churches came to a "Covenantal Agreement Regarding the Threat of Global Warming." They did this in connection with the meeting in Basel, Switzerland, of Protestant and Catholic Christians from East and West Europe on the Justice, Peace, and Integrity of Creation theme of the World Council of Churches. They agreed to work together on the problem of global warming and to give particular attention to the role of energy. They have already made an important approach to governments by advocating cooperation on reduction in the use of fossil fuels by means of energy-saving technologies and the development of renewable (solar) energy supplies. They presented comments and policy statements to the October 1989 environmental meeting in Sofia, Bulgaria, of governments belonging to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

These are significant developments. An invitation has come to U.S. churches, through their representatives on the NCC Eco-Justice Working Group and through their delegates to the 1990 World Convocation on JPIC in Seoul, Korea, to participate in this international cooperative effort of churches on global warming.

Presbyterians.
 
A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change Southern Baptist Environment and Climate Initiative

Statement 3


Christian Moral Convictions and Our Southern Baptist Doctrines Demand Our Environmental Stewardship.

While we cannot here review the full range of relevant Christian convictions and Baptist doctrines related to care of the creation, we emphasize the following points:

  • We must care about environmental and climate issues because of our love for God—“the Creator, Redeemer, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe” (BFM 2000)—through whom and for whom the creation was made. This is not our world, it is God’s. Therefore, any damage we do to this world is an offense against God Himself (Gen. 1; Ps. 24; Col. 1:16). We share God’s concern for the abuse of His creation.
  • We must care about environmental issues because of our commitment to God’s Holy and inerrant Word, which is “the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds and religious opinions should be tried” (BFM 2000). Within these Scriptures we are reminded that when God made mankind, He commissioned us to exercise stewardship over the earth and its creatures (Gen. 1:26-28). Therefore, our motivation for facing failures to exercise proper stewardship is not primarily political, social or economic—it is primarily biblical.
Southern Baptists. Looks to me like those espousing the teachings of Christ are united in their concern that we are damaging the environment by the emission of GHGs.
 
I just lost any respect for this pope and will never listen to anything from him again.

But what I find AMAZING. is all these people who didn't BELEIVE all of a sudden have now found RELIGION.

Phony hypocrites are the most dangerous of people


Do you disrespect all Christian leaders or just the Pope?
Have you given up on Christianity???


Eastern Orthodox, Anglican Spiritual Leaders Join Pope Francis Climate Change Appeal In New York Times Op-Ed

By Lora Moftah
June 19 2015

Religious leaders of different traditions are voicing their support for Pope Francis’ climate change stance following the release of the pontiff’s highly-anticipated environmental encyclical this week. On Friday, the spiritual heads of the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican churches jointly published an op-ed in the New York Times to argue that taking action on climate change was a moral responsibility, the latest sign that the issue is becoming an increasingly important one for many faith communities.

“Because of our faith in God as creator, redeemer and sustainer, we have a mission to protect nature as well as human beings,” wrote Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople and Justin Welby, archbishop of Canterbury and head of the Anglican Communion. “This is a shared moral responsibility and urgent requirement. Civil society, governmental authorities and religious leaders have an opportunity to make a difference in a way that bridges our diverse opinions and nationalities.”

Religious leaders of different traditions are voicing their support for Pope Francis’ climate change stance following the release of the pontiff’s highly-anticipated environmental encyclical this week. On Friday, the spiritual heads of the Eastern Orthodox and Anglican churches jointly published an op-ed in the New York Times to argue that taking action on climate change was a moral responsibility, the latest sign that the issue is becoming an increasingly important one for many faith communities.

<snip>

The leaders’ joint statement solidifies their individual stances into a united front on the issue that also reinforces one of the key features of Francis’ encyclical, namely the importance of an approach to tackling climate change that includes multiple denominations of Christianity.

<snip>
.

don't feed me that BS. we've watched you on the left DISRESPECT everyone who don't BOW TO YOUR THINKING. and I've never had respect for you or your leftist ilk

and YOUR ALLS conversion to religion over climate change IS a Miracle, miracle I say...

Praise be Hallelujah

no go sit down leave us alone
 
[
The Blue Pope™ was a chemist prior to entering the seminary. So he probably has a leg up on Santorum, science-wise. And several legs up on Santorum, holiness-wise.

Although I will give Santorum the prize for sanctimony.

Since AlGore is Pope of the Church of Gaea of the Holy Global Warming, er Global Cooling, er Climate Change, does this hone in on his position. or will the church have two Popes now?
 
[
The Blue Pope™ was a chemist prior to entering the seminary. So he probably has a leg up on Santorum, science-wise. And several legs up on Santorum, holiness-wise.

Although I will give Santorum the prize for sanctimony.

Since AlGore is Pope of the Church of Gaea of the Holy Global Warming, er Global Cooling, er Climate Change, does this hone in on his position. or will the church have two Popes now?

These same people preaching to us today couldn't STAND the last pope
these two faced hypocrites are a danger to us all
 
No, Ms. Stephanie, we will not leave you alone. You see, we will make laws that at least mitigate the damage already done. And laws that prevent further damage. The moral support of those that believe in the Christ is very welcome, and in line with the Parable of the Good Steward.

As far as disrespect for you goes, what do you expect? You show willful ignorance concerning this and virtually every other subject. Why should we respect that?
 
WAKE THE HELL up people

SNIP:
This was a comment from the article with Mother earthly Jone rag I posted above:
snip:
The UN/IPCC is not a scientific organization, it is a propagands organ of the UN. As Ottmar Edenhofer, Co-Chairman of the IPCC’s Working Group 3 has stated on the record:

"One must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/201...

from:
Global Warming Is Now a Medical Emergency That Could Wipe Out 50 Years of Global Health Gains Mother Jones

OH, look what else I ran across:
Chuck Schumer: Carbon tax has a chance if Clinton wins
By
ELANA SCHOR

6/23/15 7:28 PM EDT

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) outlined a path Tuesday for Hillary Clinton to enact a carbon tax if the Democrats prevail in the 2016 elections.

Schumer, the Senate Democrats’ leader-in-waiting, said that a Clinton presidency and the return of his party to the Senate majority in 2017 could pave the way for lawmakers to enact a carbon tax to help fund the government.



Read more:
Chuck Schumer Carbon tax has a chance if Clinton wins - Elana Schor - POLITICO
 
[
The Blue Pope™ was a chemist prior to entering the seminary. So he probably has a leg up on Santorum, science-wise. And several legs up on Santorum, holiness-wise.

Although I will give Santorum the prize for sanctimony.

Since AlGore is Pope of the Church of Gaea of the Holy Global Warming, er Global Cooling, er Climate Change, does this hone in on his position. or will the church have two Popes now?
Mr. Uncensored, you are getting your ass thourghly kicked. For it is not only the Catholic Church, but most of the major Protestant branches that are also stating that we have a moral obligation to take care of the planet that we live on. Your position is morally unacceptable to most of the Christian world.
 
Dear Ms. Stephanie, we don't need a carbon tax. The renewables are now less costly for producing electricity than coal or natural gas. And will continue to get cheaper. And as the grid scale batteries come online, they will be 24/7.
 
These same people preaching to us today couldn't STAND the last pope
these two faced hypocrites are a danger to us all

The Catholic Church always lends the stamp of credibility to science - just ask Galileo...
It is far more than just the Catholic Church, it is most of the major Protestant Denominations, also. For, as the Southern Baptists point out, the reason for taking care of our environment is spelled out in the Bilble.
 
No, Ms. Stephanie, we will not leave you alone. You see, we will make laws that at least mitigate the damage already done. And laws that prevent further damage. The moral support of those that believe in the Christ is very welcome, and in line with the Parable of the Good Steward.

As far as disrespect for you goes, what do you expect? You show willful ignorance concerning this and virtually every other subject. Why should we respect that?

You would like to make laws that put your political enemies in forced labor/death camps - but you lack the power to do so. So you and the Khmer Rouge democrats will make few laws and will be content with robbing the public treasury on behalf of technocrats who ape the message that plutocrats want disseminated.
 
No, Ms. Stephanie, we will not leave you alone. You see, we will make laws that at least mitigate the damage already done. And laws that prevent further damage. The moral support of those that believe in the Christ is very welcome, and in line with the Parable of the Good Steward.

As far as disrespect for you goes, what do you expect? You show willful ignorance concerning this and virtually every other subject. Why should we respect that?

You would like to make laws that put your political enemies in forced labor/death camps - but you lack the power to do so. So you and the Khmer Rouge democrats will make few laws and will be content with robbing the public treasury on behalf of technocrats who ape the message that plutocrats want disseminated.
My, my, Mr. Uncensored, you are such a silly ass. No, that is your way, not ours. We will simply make laws concerning how much pollution you can put into the atmosphere. And, since it is allready cheaper to produce electricity with wind, and soon will be the same with solar, all these laws will do will be to hasten the demise of the very dirty coal fired plants.
 

Forum List

Back
Top