🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

"Porno" Rick Perry and his "Sexy" past.

The bootom line for the fucking Obamarrhoidals is this:

If the VERY BEST HAPPENS to the Obamarrhoidal Swine, and Perry goes down the tubes ..... and, btw, that's not a foregone conclusion........a ROMNEY/BACHMANN ticket will STILL whack them to hell.

Deal with THAT !!!

With oibama you got 4 more years of bush with Romeny you get 4 more years of both
 
So now liberals are against Porn?

Or do they just think that on the way from cashing Larry Flynt's check, they think they can make a big deal out of nothing?

flynt is no hypocrite ....he doesnt have the army of god behind him...now does he?

come on dont be dense.....you are comparing apples and oranges

Flynt is no hypocrite, but he is a convicted rapist. (14 just ain't old enough!)

Not that you leftists have a problem with that.
 
Maybe Porno Perry should have listened to this song!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uP6u9FG5DQ&feature=fvst]Mark Wynter - Go Away Little Girl - YouTube[/ame]

$teensperry_.png
 
"Sallow; Another poster put this up..but I did a little digging and what do ya know?"


Be honest Sallow. If Perry picked you up in a bar, you would follow him in your car to his place.
 
Last edited:
Romney/Bachmann? What are you high?

No arsehole, just giving you the irrefutable fact that Romney/Bachmann (my choice) ....... or, Romney/Daffy Duck, will kick the semi-black Political Charlatan's arse outa the WH ....and, probably back to ACORN, or a facsimile thereof, as a RABBLE ROUSER .....ahem...."COMMUNITY FUCKING ORGANIZER", where the FREAK has the experience !!!
 
So now liberals are against Porn?

Or do they just think that on the way from cashing Larry Flynt's check, they think they can make a big deal out of nothing?

flynt is no hypocrite ....he doesnt have the army of god behind him...now does he?

come on dont be dense.....you are comparing apples and oranges

I was just asking the question. After years of defending not only porn and vulgarity, but demanding that the taxpayer pay for it through the NEA and such, Democrats are now claiming that it was a bad thing that a company that produces porn found it more economical to work in Texas than California?

Really?

Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
 
flynt is no hypocrite ....he doesnt have the army of god behind him...now does he?

come on dont be dense.....you are comparing apples and oranges

I was just asking the question. After years of defending not only porn and vulgarity, but demanding that the taxpayer pay for it through the NEA and such, Democrats are now claiming that it was a bad thing that a company that produces porn found it more economical to work in Texas than California?

Really?

Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.

Except in order for their to be hypocrisy, there has to be intentional action. If you say it's wrong to murder people and someone jumps out in front of your car and you kill them, that's not hyprocritical. In that situation, you'd be saying he was hypocritical for driving the fucking car. There is nothing in there that comes anywhere close to indicating Perry actually knew he was investing in a company that made money off of pornography.
 
flynt is no hypocrite ....he doesnt have the army of god behind him...now does he?

come on dont be dense.....you are comparing apples and oranges

I was just asking the question. After years of defending not only porn and vulgarity, but demanding that the taxpayer pay for it through the NEA and such, Democrats are now claiming that it was a bad thing that a company that produces porn found it more economical to work in Texas than California?

Really?

Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
Stop with the fucking dishonesty, and address what Bachmann is actually stating.

Without serious reforms, there will be no Medicare. The money will not be there to fund it.

And, who really gives a shit if Perry invested in a company, whose one small part of its business distributes porn?

Do you clowns really think this BS has traction. That those out there who have been completely screwed over by Obama's ineptness are really going to give a shit about Perry investing in the company?

LMAO!

Lets just face the facts....You clowns fear Perry because he actually has a record to run on. Obama doesn't.....Perry isn't economically illiterate. Obama is......Perry has a record of economic success. Obama has a record of abject economic failure.
 
Last edited:
I was just asking the question. After years of defending not only porn and vulgarity, but demanding that the taxpayer pay for it through the NEA and such, Democrats are now claiming that it was a bad thing that a company that produces porn found it more economical to work in Texas than California?

Really?

Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.

Except in order for their to be hypocrisy, there has to be intentional action. If you say it's wrong to murder people and someone jumps out in front of your car and you kill them, that's not hyprocritical. In that situation, you'd be saying he was hypocritical for driving the fucking car. There is nothing in there that comes anywhere close to indicating Perry actually knew he was investing in a company that made money off of pornography.

Oh..what about this?

Rick Perry Sought State Profits From Teacher Life Insurance Scheme

How many of these "one off" things does Perry get a write off on in the eyes of Conservatives?
 
Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.

Except in order for their to be hypocrisy, there has to be intentional action. If you say it's wrong to murder people and someone jumps out in front of your car and you kill them, that's not hyprocritical. In that situation, you'd be saying he was hypocritical for driving the fucking car. There is nothing in there that comes anywhere close to indicating Perry actually knew he was investing in a company that made money off of pornography.

Oh..what about this?

Rick Perry Sought State Profits From Teacher Life Insurance Scheme

How many of these "one off" things does Perry get a write off on in the eyes of Conservatives?

JoseFuck already started a thread on that bullshit...

Already being laughed at in that thread....:lol:

Do pay attention so that you 0bama fluffers can sync up your talking points...
 
So now liberals are against Porn?

Or do they just think that on the way from cashing Larry Flynt's check, they think they can make a big deal out of nothing?

It doesn't matter if liberals are for or against porn, many social conservatives are against it.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-glb-_heEg]The internet is for porn- Avenue Q - YouTube[/ame]
 
Nice dodge. Just can't admit flaws in your own? I understand. You're just like the Libs that way.
The point here is very simple: Perry's campaign is largely centered around him being a Conservative Christian. Now if he was campaigning solely on being a fiscal Conservative, there would be no story here. It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.
It's similar to Whackmann voluntarily choosing to receives over $600K from Medicare. That's all fine, I don't care and so what? - Except that part of her campaign has been going around claiming that Medicare will result in the end of the country, is morally objectionable etc.... It's the obvious hypocrisy that makes it a story.

Except in order for their to be hypocrisy, there has to be intentional action. If you say it's wrong to murder people and someone jumps out in front of your car and you kill them, that's not hyprocritical. In that situation, you'd be saying he was hypocritical for driving the fucking car. There is nothing in there that comes anywhere close to indicating Perry actually knew he was investing in a company that made money off of pornography.

Oh..what about this?

Rick Perry Sought State Profits From Teacher Life Insurance Scheme

How many of these "one off" things does Perry get a write off on in the eyes of Conservatives?
Huffpost?.....Get the fuck outta here!:cuckoo:

You people are so desperate to avoid running your beloved Ineptness In Chiefs failure on all fronts of the economy against Perry's record of economic success, that it's become friggin' laughable.

Desperate times call for desperate measures, eh?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top