RhodyPatriot
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2022
- 13,429
- 18,534
- Thread starter
- #81
You brought up Pence, not me.
Yes dude.
In a contemporaneous sense.
The argument from 2016.....when he was the VP candidate.
Jesus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You brought up Pence, not me.
What’s laughable is a guy that is upset the courts are getting on the way of locking up someone talking about anything in regards to our democracy.Sure. Your so called concern for the "rule of law" is laughable considering your adoration of someone like Trump & his crew who rampaged thru the capital on J6.
Do you post that bullshit with a straight face?
What’s laughable is a guy that is upset the courts are getting on the way of locking up someone talking about anything in regards to our democracy.
You are a clear and present danger
Pence made it clear he's not endorsing Trump, which is historic for a former vp to not endorse his president.Pence hasn’t publicly endorced trump but made clear he won’t back xiden.
Xiden is trying to kill our country after all
Pence made it clear he's not endorsing Trump, which is historic for a former vp to not endorse his president.
Ok, but he made it clear he’s not supporting xidenPence made it clear he's not endorsing Trump, which is historic for a former vp to not endorse his president.
Anarchy in the universities. Jewish students beaten. Illegal immigration off the charts and the president's mental capacity deteriorating every day. Meanwhile TDS lefties spend their time reading anti Trump propaganda generated by the British media. No surprise here.
Being right and all? I agree. The former President is indeed presidential material.Wow. Real presidential material there.....
tRump can't give a SOTU address. He isn't president.You must be referring to the "Old Man Yells At Cloud" state of the Union last March.
Taz prefers Biden and the swamp.Being right and all? I agree. The former President is indeed presidential material.
That’s why he was referring to the senile fucktard, Potato. You dope.tRump can't give a SOTU address. He isn't president.
LMAO!!!No he will pretend to in order to signify how boring the procedures against him are and you lib loons will incorrectly gobble it up and spew it back
It means you support a party that touts itself as the 'law and order' party whose members can't keep from being indicted. You wax about corruption when your candidates are poster boys for corruption. You want to shelve your principles when it is convenient for you. You want it both ways at once. Populism.Empty ad hominem screed devoid of an argument
The orange bag O' shit lost the '20 election, denoting the polling trends were accurate.What is also true is Trump never led Biden once in 2020
Denoting the polling trends were inaccurate.nor Hillary in 2016.
That the orange bag O' shit is a shoe-in to be elected *pResident in November. That's what you're looking for, right?Now, with the powers of your generous mental prowess, extrapolate upon what that might mean for what the polls are telling us now.
It means you support a party that touts itself as the 'law and order' party whose members can't keep from being indicted.
Denoting the polling trends were inaccurate.
Wow, it's almost as if polls are a failsafe indicator of outcome, except when they aren't. Especially because they change, or are flat out wrong. Weird, huh?
He was indicted by his political opposition.
Grand juries aren't political, so you're speaking based on your personal political bias and nothing else. What about the other members of Team bag O' shit that have been indicted? It's as if you're allergic to facts, pal. Try again.He was indicted by his political opposition.
The guy sitting in the WH doesn't effect me much. Magaturds just don't like being called out for their bullshit. And yours is most definitely bullshit.You're just blinded by abject rage because of your TDS, so you fail to see the obvious.
Grand juries aren't political
So, you're saying the defendant is so hated in society that there is zero chance he'll get a fair trial, correct?Unless the only reason they even happen, years and years after a statute of limitations has expired, is because a Democrat cannot defeat their political opponent on the issues alone.
In that case?
Grand juries are quite political.
Where have you been?