Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
So you prefer less precise answers to polls? The conclusion should be Rasmussen polls should replace the poll averages until other polls begin to seek more precise results.So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Even if for sake of argument that is the case then at the very least Rasmussen polls should not be included in the poll averages where all of the other polls simply ask the straightforward approve/disapprove question.
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
So your argument is that Rasmussen is full of shit saying that Trump is at 50% approval?
lol
So you prefer less precise answers to polls? The conclusion should be Rasmussen polls should replace the poll averages until other polls begin to seek more precise results.So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Even if for sake of argument that is the case then at the very least Rasmussen polls should not be included in the poll averages where all of the other polls simply ask the straightforward approve/disapprove question.
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
So your argument is that Rasmussen is full of shit saying that Trump is at 50% approval?
lol
Look bud...like all legit Americans I can't give two shits about any poll and or what it may imply. WE GOT OUR GUY...and we love watching the ignorant whackos squirm as he continues bitch-slapping our lowest grade.
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
So your argument is that Rasmussen is full of shit saying that Trump is at 50% approval?
lol
Look bud...like all legit Americans I can't give two shits about any poll and or what it may imply. WE GOT OUR GUY...and we love watching the ignorant whackos squirm as he continues bitch-slapping our lowest grade.
lol, you gave enough shits to come into this thread and make a fool of yourself.
Of course there is. This way you find out not only who approves or disapproves but also which way people who haven't committed are leaning. That's why polls that don't ask these questions have so many undecideds.So you prefer less precise answers to polls? The conclusion should be Rasmussen polls should replace the poll averages until other polls begin to seek more precise results.So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Even if for sake of argument that is the case then at the very least Rasmussen polls should not be included in the poll averages where all of the other polls simply ask the straightforward approve/disapprove question.
There is nothing 'precise' about asking someone if they 'somewhat' approve of the job the president is doing.
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
Of course there is. This way you find out not only who approves or disapproves but also which way people who haven't committed are leaning. That's why polls that don't ask these questions have so many undecideds.So you prefer less precise answers to polls? The conclusion should be Rasmussen polls should replace the poll averages until other polls begin to seek more precise results.So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.Here's how Rasmussen in their own words explains why their presidential approval numbers are consistently higher than standard method pollsters:
Rasmussen offered this explanation:
When comparing Job Approval ratings between different polling firms, it's important to focus on trends rather than absolute numbers. One reason for this is that different firms ask Job Approval questions in different ways.
At Rasmussen Reports, we ask if people Strongly Approve, Somewhat Approve, Somewhat Disapprove, or Strongly Disapprove of the way the President is performing his job.
This approach, in the current political environment, yields results about 3-4 points higher than if we simply ask if people if they approve or disapprove (we have tested this by asking the question both ways on the same night).
Presumably, this is because some people who are a bit uncomfortable saying they "Approve" are willing to say they "Somewhat Approve." It's worth noting that, with our approach, virtually nobody offers a "Not Sure" response when asked about the President.
Mystery Pollster: Rasmussen Update: A Lesson in Measurement Error
Even if for sake of argument that is the case then at the very least Rasmussen polls should not be included in the poll averages where all of the other polls simply ask the straightforward approve/disapprove question.
There is nothing 'precise' about asking someone if they 'somewhat' approve of the job the president is doing.
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
So your argument is that Rasmussen is full of shit saying that Trump is at 50% approval?
lol
Look bud...like all legit Americans I can't give two shits about any poll and or what it may imply. WE GOT OUR GUY...and we love watching the ignorant whackos squirm as he continues bitch-slapping our lowest grade.
lol, you gave enough shits to come into this thread and make a fool of yourself.
Really?
Most would say the only people making fools of themselves are those who are still whining and pissing their pants four months into this presidency.
No, it adds to both sides because the undecided are included on both sides. What you are saying is that you would rather not know which way undecided voters are leaning, which means you want less precise poll numbers.Of course there is. This way you find out not only who approves or disapproves but also which way people who haven't committed are leaning. That's why polls that don't ask these questions have so many undecideds.So you prefer less precise answers to polls? The conclusion should be Rasmussen polls should replace the poll averages until other polls begin to seek more precise results.So the conclusion would have to be that Rasmussen's numbers more precisely reflect the true opinions of the people polled.
Even if for sake of argument that is the case then at the very least Rasmussen polls should not be included in the poll averages where all of the other polls simply ask the straightforward approve/disapprove question.
There is nothing 'precise' about asking someone if they 'somewhat' approve of the job the president is doing.
What's wrong with undecided?
Plus you're ignoring the fact that Rasmussen has proven that their method adds points to the approve side for an incumbent president.
Be fair now. He did defeat the smartest and most qualified candidate in the history of the world after all.Why are you so obsessed with Hillary Clinton, who did not win the Presidency. Is it because that's the ONLY time in his life that Trump has won anything?
Whoaaa there Trigger! In your post #2 of this thread, you gave tacit support for the Rasmussen poll noted in the OP and now that it's referenced by implication you deride it and other polls with sophomoric bullshit!Regardless of how much bloody lipstick one puts on the Orange Pig, the fact of the matter is that the Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with the American People since his election and his appeal is gradually trending DOWN!
Well, in the spirit of accuracy let me fix that for you.
"The Ego-in-Chief has been underwater with men who love penis, men who believe they're women, illegal immigrants, criminals and government dependent bottom feeders since his election."
The Orange One is underwater in his overall favorability with a majority of the Americans polled and has been since the bloody election, your childish quips, notwithstanding. Your idiotic ramblings are not going to change the fact that the Liar-in-Chief is a failed Presidential experiment.
You couldn't be more mistaken...and it drives you whackos nuts that my assertion couldn't be more accurate.
You should consult with that filthy whore that ran for the dark side about the accuracy of polls..haha
Why are you so obsessed with Hillary Clinton, who did not win the Presidency. Is it because that's the ONLY time in his life that Trump has won anything?
Trump is underwater with anyone with critical thinking abilities, who isn't thrilled that his response to bad poll numbers is to start wars and blow shit up. I realize blowing shit up is real popular with the non-thinking men who act before they think, but it is a dangerous world out there.
