Progressives rotate 180°on their views over night

[P@triot]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

 

[SYTFE]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

 

[Slade3200]

I just think our country made a tremendous stride with the civil rights act and I can't imagine seeing a business in my community that was a whites only diner, or that had a sign saying no gays allowed. Or a cab company that won't service blacks... To me that is anti-american on the same lines as the nazi, white supremacist agendas.

I understand what you're trying to say - but I think it's misguided. It's much more anti-American to have government force private citizens or private industry into some perceived moral high ground.

We have to stop demanding that people stop hate. If someone hates gays, or blacks, or whatever, so be it. That's freedom. That's liberty. I could give a shit that the Black Panthers hate me because I'm white. Doesn't bother me in the least.

you are right about freedom and liberty but thats what we had for decades and thats what brought slavery and jim crow and segregated schools... Private industry contains a tremendous amount of power and they are just as corrupt, if not more so, than the government. They have the ability to inflict tremendous harm to our citizens as shown throughout history. The government has the same ability to inflict harm but they also are the only ones that are able to stand up for the oppressed. It has to go both ways. To me it sounds like you think the Civil Rights Act was government over reach. is that really how you feel? Would you be ok with the segregation and discrimination that existed before the government stepped in?

 

[Crixus]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

That right there is why you libtards have been so angry since 2010.

 

[Slade3200]

The difference is that one is using hate speech and the other is promoting a political agenda. Big difference.

Says who? Frankly, I consider everything that comes out of a progressives mouth to be the ultimate hate speech. Look at how they lie about people and destroy reputations.

Remember how inappropriate it was when BLM chanted for cops to fry like bacon.

Well you cannot advocate violence against people. Threatening a person is illegal.

I agree about the threats and think the BLM crew that were chanting for death to cops were disgraceful and that should have been shut down.

As for the hate speech, there is a difference between differences between political ideology and calling for the extermination of entire races of people. Especially after we've seen the attempted "cleansing" efforts by the Nazi's and we've seen the segregation efforts by the kkk and WS... Millions have died and multiple wars have been fought because of it. Those facts alone have to put those group at an elevated level of threat

 

[SYTFE]

Gotta love the sick fuck H@triot defending the white nationalist scum because they "had a permit." That makes them the "good guys," and "fine people," right H@triot? Bet you were there too, eh tough guy? I bet you were cheering right along with the KKK leader praising an innocent women's death, right H@triot?

 

[francoHFW]

There is no such thing privately owned business in socialists societies....

Yes there are.

Somebody someday will define socialism and communism in the USA. So far it seems the New BS GOP ikes to keep the conflation of the Cold War. Everywhere else democracy is the difference between them.

Will that definition include or exclude the murder of over 100 million people ?

Yes, by communists- not democratic socialists.

 

[francoHFW]

The difference is that one is using hate speech and the other is promoting a political agenda. Big difference.

Says who? Frankly, I consider everything that comes out of a progressives mouth to be the ultimate hate speech. Look at how they lie about people and destroy reputations.

Remember how inappropriate it was when BLM chanted for cops to fry like bacon.

Well you cannot advocate violence against people. Threatening a person is illegal.

ONLY on FOX Rush etc....that was black gangsta wannabees and bs Fox propaganda...

 

[Spare_change]

Perhaps you can give us an example of Trump "preaching the kid of race hate" ....

We await your ever so considered input.

Calling Mexicans rapists and murderers, to start with.

But like most Trump apologists, you'll babble out something like "What he meant was"....

I guess you didn't read the actual quote, did you? Instead, you rely on a perverted and twisted interpretation of what was said. But, hey, I understand ... the truth has never been kind to the left. I can see why you avoid it so assiduously.

 

[Spare_change]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

No left = no violence. One was there legally, one wasn't.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Again with the false premise thread .

But I'll answer . We have specific laws that say a business can't discriminate based on XYZ. For example , handicapped people .

No law says they can't discriminate based on political standing.

So if a gay couple walks into a bakery and demands a cake, the baker can refuse on the grounds that they are democrats and demand they prove differently?

 

[bodecea]

For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.

Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).

So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.

And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".

This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).

Have you ever heard of PA laws? And what they cover and DON'T cover? Educate yourself.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

There was no violence until antifa showed up. There was a peaceful protest and a tiki torch march. No violence.

 

[bodecea]

Gays are not protected by federal anti discrimination law. They are protected in several states.

Neo-Nazi-KKK-SkinHeads are not protected by any anti-discrimination laws.

My favorite is when those who have NO CLUE about PA laws try to show Muslim businesses refusing to bake a wedding cake for gays......in Michigan.....which has no PA law protection over sexual orientation. They are truly clueless.

 

[Crixus]

Gays are not protected by federal anti discrimination law. They are protected in several states.

Neo-Nazi-KKK-SkinHeads are not protected by any anti-discrimination laws.

My favorite is when those who have NO CLUE about PA laws try to show Muslim businesses refusing to bake a wedding cake for gays......in Michigan.....which has no PA law protection over sexual orientation. They are truly clueless.

Plywood access law?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

Legally they had a right to march the other side did not. Regardless of how repugnant the value system all have a right to voice their opinions until actions take away the rights of others words do not do that.

 

[keepitreal]

For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.

Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).

So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.

And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".

This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).

People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?

People are standing up to groups and individuals that spread hate speech and who are widely condemned by every leader in our country including Trump. How can you compare that to an oppressed minority group like homosexuals?

As usual with the double standards justification

Discrimination is discrimination

Hate is hate

You can't silence or forbid one type of hatred,
and force through legalization, the tolerance of another!

Homosexuals hate being held to moral standards of decency
Homosexuality is not normal and no one or no law
will force me, nor convince me otherwise

I am so ecstatic the signs are all around us,
I am soooo ready!

By saying homosexuality isn't normal is not keeping it real. Who made you the arbiter of what is normal.
Jeezzzz

By saying homosexuality isn't normal is not keeping it real. Who made you the arbiter of what is normal.
Jeezzzz

Oh please, how bout you keeping it real!

Just because it's the new normal, to redefine normalcy,
doesn't make it normal...it's their normal
(by their, I mean LGTBQ+XYZ, and whatever other letters)

Jeezzzz, if it was normal,
they wouldn't have been in the closet,
stayed in the closet and continue to stay in the closet

 

[Crixus]

One thing for sure, last weekend America saw two hate groups come together and embarrass the country. They need to starte disavowing the same behavior To.

But only one side had a permit for their lawful and peaceful demonstration. The lawless left did what it always does - showed up to stir up shit.

Oh! Well if they HAD A PERMIT then that means their violence was just A-OK! Right Hatriot?

Legally they had a right to march the other side did not. Regardless of how repugnant the value system all have a right to voice their opinions until actions take away the rights of others words do not do that.

Yup, but they all behaved badly. Over time I expect the Mayer and police chief get shit for being incompetent, that and yes, you can say what you like but our 1st amendment don't absolve us of responsibility and accountability for what our words do. No one there on either side were there to speak. They were there to fight, break windows and burn cars. There were no good guys among that rable, only anacrchist.

 

[keepitreal]

View attachment 144121 Here rotate on this.
I am consistent with all my views. So take your bullshit somewhere else.

Yes we know....you show fascist tendencies on a regular basis.

Way to pull shit directly from your ass.

Way to pull shit directly from your ass.

ROFLMMFAO

We've had snappier comebacks from a bowl of rice krispies!

You talk so much shit, you need a diaper on your head!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

For the past 10 years or so we had to hear from progressives how businesses were not private. How they belonged to the government and/or the public. How serving the public meant they had no right to refuse service.

Yet the past few days, progressives had drowned social media celebrating stories of businesses who "serve the public" denying Nazi and/or white supremacist groups service. One was a restaurant. The big news today was ISP and cloud services denying their services to a website called "Daily Stormer" (apparently some white supremacist site).

So what happened? When a business owner wanted to refuse service to homosexuals based on their religious beliefs (fully protected by the U.S. Constitution), the left completely lost their shit. They insisted that it was "discrimination" and demanded that either the business be forced - at the barrel of a gun - to provide their products or services, or be run out of business.

And yet, when a business does the exact same thing to another group (for reasons not protected by the U.S. Constitution), all we hear from the fascists is "they have the right to refuse service".

This is what happens when views/ideologies are built from irrational emotion instead of logic and reason. There is an absurd contradiction and lack of consistency - which completely obliterates all credibility (hence the reason nobody takes the left seriously on anything).

White supremacists aren't a protected class, dope.