Top Conservative Judge 'Profoundly' Worried By Right-Wing Court's Direction, Believes Trump Will Skate On Coup Crimes

[BluesLegend]

This is when we say SUCK IT Dems, the Trump SCOTUS will continue to clean up your mess.

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump is going to be your next President. Take a deep breath and deal with it!

Dems are about to explode knowing soon Trump will once again be the boss of them.

 

[Lesh]

Dems are about to explode knowing soon Trump will once again be the boss of them.

Pointing

Counting your chickens huh?

But then when are you ever right?

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no “insurrection” or “coup”.

You delusional Marxfags can deny reality all you want, it doesn’t mean your false narrative is true in the real world.

All of a sudden these pukes love Conservative Republicans.

 

[Billiejeens]

I dont know Luttig, so I cant swear that he doesent have a conservative bone in his body

He was appointed by george hw bush which means he’s likely to be a loyal swamp rat who may swing to the right

But the entire bush clan and all their lackeys hate trump and us MAGAs

And that has more to do with inside washington politics and control of the great unwashed base voters by the elites than it does any conservative issue

This.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

All of a sudden these pukes love Conservative Republicans.

The funny thing is that these Lefties think that the rest of us are going to change our minds because of an unhinged opinion. Tells me that they think that unhinged opinions are convincing.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Shocker From Top Conservative Judge: Trump Likely To Skate Completely​

J. Michael Luttig sees two potential outcomes from Thursday’s Supreme Court arguments. Both are grim for our democracy.​

“I’m profoundly disturbed about the apparent direction of the court,” J. Michael Luttig told me. “I now believe that it is unlikely Trump will ever be tried for the crimes he committed in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.”

I called Luttig, a former federal judge with extensive conservative credentials, to solicit his reaction to this week’s Supreme Court hearing over Donald Trump’s demand for absolute immunity from prosecution for any crimes related to his insurrection attempt. On Thursday, Luttig posted a thread critiquing the right-wing justices for their apparent openness to Trump’s arguments—but that thread was legalistic and formal, so I figured Luttig had a lot more to say.

And did he ever. Luttig lacerated the right-wing justices for harboring a “radical vision” of the American presidency, and pronounced himself “gravely” worried that Trump will never face accountability for alleged crimes committed in attempting to destroy U.S. democracy through extensive procedural corruption and the naked incitement of mob violence.

Luttig’s fear that Trump may very well skate centers on the lines of questioning from the court’s right-wing majority about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s ongoing prosecution of Trump. As many observers noted, those justices appeared largely uninterested in the question before them—whether Trump’s alleged crimes related to the insurrection constituted official presidential acts that are immune from prosecution after leaving office.

Instead, the justices dwelled on the supposed future consequences of prosecuting presidents for crimes, and seemed to want to place some limits on that eventuality. That suggests the justices will kick the case back to lower courts to determine whether some definition of official presidential acts must be protected (and whether Trump’s specific acts qualify).

Such a move would almost certainly push Trump’s trial until after the election, and if he wins, he can simply cancel prosecutions of himself. Luttig fears that outcome. But he also worries that even if Trump loses the election, there may well be five Supreme Court votes for siding with Trump’s demand for immunity. Both outcomes would functionally end his prosecution.

“I believe it is now likely either that Trump will get elected and instruct his attorney general to drop the charges, or that the Supreme Court will grant him immunity from prosecution,” Luttig told me.

More at the link below...

Top Conservative Judge 'Profoundly' Worried By Right-Wing Court's Direction, Believes Trump Will Skate On Coup Crimes

I am greatly disappointed that Trump may never be held fully accountable for his actions! I am greatly disappointed in our current judicial system - especially SCOTUS. What do you think?

Trump committed no crimes so there's nothing to skate on Lakookta.

 

[jbrownson0831]

What insurrection? Dimtards sure are dense.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Luttig and Tribe are American patriots! Trump is an anti-American traitor!

Where will you move Lakookta?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Luttig’s fear that Trump may very well skate centers on the lines of questioning from the court’s right-wing majority about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s ongoing prosecution of Trump. As many observers noted, those justices appeared largely uninterested in the question before them—whether Trump’s alleged crimes related to the insurrection constituted official presidential acts that are immune from prosecution after leaving office.

We can expect no justice from a Supreme Court dominated by blind partisan conservative ideologues or district courts with like Trump appointees.

 

[jbrownson0831]

We can expect no justice from a Supreme Court dominated by blind partisan conservative ideologues or district courts with like Trump appointees.

You can expect no making up of the law, is what you mean Mrs. Jones.
Conservatives support and defend the laws of our country, not your banana republic.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Shocker From Top Conservative Judge: Trump Likely To Skate Completely​

J. Michael Luttig sees two potential outcomes from Thursday’s Supreme Court arguments. Both are grim for our democracy.​

“I’m profoundly disturbed about the apparent direction of the court,” J. Michael Luttig told me. “I now believe that it is unlikely Trump will ever be tried for the crimes he committed in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.”

I called Luttig, a former federal judge with extensive conservative credentials, to solicit his reaction to this week’s Supreme Court hearing over Donald Trump’s demand for absolute immunity from prosecution for any crimes related to his insurrection attempt. On Thursday, Luttig posted a thread critiquing the right-wing justices for their apparent openness to Trump’s arguments—but that thread was legalistic and formal, so I figured Luttig had a lot more to say.

And did he ever. Luttig lacerated the right-wing justices for harboring a “radical vision” of the American presidency, and pronounced himself “gravely” worried that Trump will never face accountability for alleged crimes committed in attempting to destroy U.S. democracy through extensive procedural corruption and the naked incitement of mob violence.

Luttig’s fear that Trump may very well skate centers on the lines of questioning from the court’s right-wing majority about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s ongoing prosecution of Trump. As many observers noted, those justices appeared largely uninterested in the question before them—whether Trump’s alleged crimes related to the insurrection constituted official presidential acts that are immune from prosecution after leaving office.

Instead, the justices dwelled on the supposed future consequences of prosecuting presidents for crimes, and seemed to want to place some limits on that eventuality. That suggests the justices will kick the case back to lower courts to determine whether some definition of official presidential acts must be protected (and whether Trump’s specific acts qualify).

Such a move would almost certainly push Trump’s trial until after the election, and if he wins, he can simply cancel prosecutions of himself. Luttig fears that outcome. But he also worries that even if Trump loses the election, there may well be five Supreme Court votes for siding with Trump’s demand for immunity. Both outcomes would functionally end his prosecution.

“I believe it is now likely either that Trump will get elected and instruct his attorney general to drop the charges, or that the Supreme Court will grant him immunity from prosecution,” Luttig told me.

More at the link below...

Top Conservative Judge 'Profoundly' Worried By Right-Wing Court's Direction, Believes Trump Will Skate On Coup Crimes

I am greatly disappointed that Trump may never be held fully accountable for his actions! I am greatly disappointed in our current judicial system - especially SCOTUS. What do you think?

Don’t worry, Lesh…sometime in the future…when you have control of the courts, you ca open this case up and have it overturned and be able to put Trump in jail where you want him.

That’s the cool thing about statute of limitations, it means you can get em down the road…and if the statute of limitations runs out, you can just make dredge up some obscure law to revive the statute of limitations.

So, the question is not IF you can get him, it’s just how long you’ll have to wait to where you can overturn scotus rulings to put him back in court.

 

[Lastamender]

Shocker From Top Conservative Judge: Trump Likely To Skate Completely​

J. Michael Luttig sees two potential outcomes from Thursday’s Supreme Court arguments. Both are grim for our democracy.​

“I’m profoundly disturbed about the apparent direction of the court,” J. Michael Luttig told me. “I now believe that it is unlikely Trump will ever be tried for the crimes he committed in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.”

I called Luttig, a former federal judge with extensive conservative credentials, to solicit his reaction to this week’s Supreme Court hearing over Donald Trump’s demand for absolute immunity from prosecution for any crimes related to his insurrection attempt. On Thursday, Luttig posted a thread critiquing the right-wing justices for their apparent openness to Trump’s arguments—but that thread was legalistic and formal, so I figured Luttig had a lot more to say.

And did he ever. Luttig lacerated the right-wing justices for harboring a “radical vision” of the American presidency, and pronounced himself “gravely” worried that Trump will never face accountability for alleged crimes committed in attempting to destroy U.S. democracy through extensive procedural corruption and the naked incitement of mob violence.

Luttig’s fear that Trump may very well skate centers on the lines of questioning from the court’s right-wing majority about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s ongoing prosecution of Trump. As many observers noted, those justices appeared largely uninterested in the question before them—whether Trump’s alleged crimes related to the insurrection constituted official presidential acts that are immune from prosecution after leaving office.

Instead, the justices dwelled on the supposed future consequences of prosecuting presidents for crimes, and seemed to want to place some limits on that eventuality. That suggests the justices will kick the case back to lower courts to determine whether some definition of official presidential acts must be protected (and whether Trump’s specific acts qualify).

Such a move would almost certainly push Trump’s trial until after the election, and if he wins, he can simply cancel prosecutions of himself. Luttig fears that outcome. But he also worries that even if Trump loses the election, there may well be five Supreme Court votes for siding with Trump’s demand for immunity. Both outcomes would functionally end his prosecution.

“I believe it is now likely either that Trump will get elected and instruct his attorney general to drop the charges, or that the Supreme Court will grant him immunity from prosecution,” Luttig told me.

More at the link below...

Top Conservative Judge 'Profoundly' Worried By Right-Wing Court's Direction, Believes Trump Will Skate On Coup Crimes

I am greatly disappointed that Trump may never be held fully accountable for his actions! I am greatly disappointed in our current judicial system - especially SCOTUS. What do you think?

Oh my another Trump hater has something to say. Fuck him.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

When grandmothers are put in prison for the crime of parading, there never was a coup.

 

[Lesh]

When grandmothers are put in prison for the crime of parading, there never was a coup.

Did “Gramma” go to jail?

For what? Link required

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Did “Gramma” go to jail?

For what? Link required

No. You look it up yourself. Rebecca Lavrenz, 71 years old prayed for ten minutes. Convicted April 4.

 

[Lesh]

No. You look it up yourself. Rebecca Lavrenz, 71 years old prayed for ten minutes. Convicted April 4.

Why can’t you document your shit cat breath?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump may skate on crimes.

That is why the American voter must defeat him in the fall.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Why can’t you document your shit cat breath?

I did. Can't you read?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump may skate on crimes.

That is why the American voter must defeat him in the fall.

There are no crimes. Which is why enemy democrats will be defeated.