Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 65,547
- 47,500
- 3,565
I wont say that guilt-ridden white libs are not informedLots on informed people do. Pretending otherwise doesn't help make your case.
They are just misinformed by bad logic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wont say that guilt-ridden white libs are not informedLots on informed people do. Pretending otherwise doesn't help make your case.
I'm asking what you can prove. What does it actually mean when you say no informed people think so? Informed according to who? You? Who's you?I wont say that guilt-ridden white libs are not informed
They are just misinformed by bad logic
100% silenceNotice: Never any outrage amongst the Black Commumity no matter the volume or the severity of the murders, violence, killings, rapes, unprovoked, suckerpunchingscum,
100% silence. But for Coach Lebron and other "elite" TV black chime in to bash others?
I have already answered you. You dislike the answer, although you know that the answer is right. Light skinned people have always had more prestige than dark skinned people.Is it commonly understood to be true? Prove that. And again I'm asking for causations not correlations which don't speak to causes.
If you feel you've sufficiently shown cause ok. I'm happy to see you rest your argument on what you've presented so far. LolI have already answered you. You dislike the answer, although you know that the answer is right. Light skinned people have always had more prestige than dark skinned people.
You know that what I say is true.If you feel you've sufficiently shown cause ok. I'm happy to see you rest your argument on what you've presented so far. Lol
Wrong. I know you think what you've presented shows sufficient cause.You know that what I say is true.![]()
![]()
It means I think they have huge gaps in their knowledgeI'm asking what you can prove. What does it actually mean when you say no informed people think so? Informed according to who? You? Who's you?
They who and based on what? Let's take Ta-Nehisi Coates's historically extensive Case For Reparations.It means I think they have huge gaps in their knowledge
Wrong. I know you think what you've presented shows sufficient cause.
Those are statistics for rates of criminality. I want you to give me proof these disparities are caused by the racial make up of black people, which is your argument, no?Race and crime in the United States
According to the FBI 2019 Uniform Crime Report, African-Americans accounted for 55.9% of all homicide offenders in 2019, with whites 41.1%, and "Other" 3% in cases where the race was known. Including homicide offenders where the race was unknown.
The per-capita offending rate for African-Americans was roughly eight times higher than that of whites
In the United States, crime data are collected from three major sources:
- Law enforcement agency crime reports, collected monthly by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and processed annually as Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)
- victimization surveys, collected biannually by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and processed annually in the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
- self-report surveys
- Race and crime in the United States - Wikipedia.
Systemic racism is the current alibi for black failure when there is no evidence of racial discrimination.They who and based on what? Let's take Ta-Nehisi Coates's historically extensive Case For Reparations.
What do you think you could add, intellectually speaking, to that treatise on systemic discrimination during the twentieth century? I'm fascinated to discover what you imagine to be your equivalent intellectual contribution. Lol
The proof is that Negroes have high crime rates everywhere they live, even when they live in black run countries.Those are statistics for rates of criminality. I want you to give me proof these disparities are caused by the racial make up of black people, which is your argument, no?
The west coast is dead.The South has always been the economic backwater of the United States. During the 1850's the vast majority of European immigrants moved to the Northy, because that was where the economic opportunities.
The industrial revolution happened in the North. The computer revolution is happening on the West Coast.
You not willing or being intellectually incapable of addressing the evidence isn't the same as there being no evidence. Here's a pretty thorough breakdown of the socioeconomic inequalities built purposefully into New Deal Policies. Those policies actually existed. You need a bit more than, "no they didn't" as a counter.Systemic racism is the current alibi for black failure when there is no evidence of racial discrimination.
Are you talking about the basketball player who got stabbed? That's basically all I know about, why would I be ashamed or proud of him one way or another? I don't know him. He has nothing to do with me. The fact that you think I would even have feelings of shame or pride around a rando stranger just because we're both black is weird.Curried Goats,
What do you think of Chris Copeland? Why do you think he did what he did? Are you proud of him, or ashamed?
That's proof of a correlation not causation. It's okay if you don't know the difference. You did your best.The proof is that Negroes have high crime rates everywhere they live, even when they live in black run countries.
I'm sure that makes all the sense to you.That makes sense when one thinks about characteristics that had survival value in sub Saharan Africa.