Proportional Map of Electoral Votes: Biden 267, Trump 266, Others 5 (Statistical Tie given contested ballots)

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Jan 21, 2010
23,669
4,178
290
National Freedmen's Town District
US STATEElectoral VotesBIDEN - 267TRUMP - 266ReportingOTHERS - 5
Alabama
9​
36.40​
3​
62.50​
6​
99%​
Alaska
3​
33.50​
1​
62.10​
2​
50%​
Arizona
11​
1,444,213​
50.70​
6​
1,365,040​
47.90​
5​
86%​
Arkansas
6​
34.50​
2​
62.60​
4​
93%​
California
55​
7,910,112​
65.30​
36​
3,986,276​
32.90​
18​
66%​
1​
Colorado
9​
55.40​
5​
42.10​
4​
90%​
Connecticut
7​
57.30​
4​
41.20​
3​
96%​
Delaware
3​
58.80​
2​
39.80​
1​
99%​
Florida
29​
5,283,904​
47.80​
14​
5,658,404​
51.20​
15​
99%​
Georgia
16​
407,589​
49.20​
8​
430,156​
49.60​
8​
98%​
Hawaii
4​
63.70​
3​
34.30​
1​
96%​
Idaho
4​
33.10​
1​
63.90​
3​
99%​
Illinois
20​
2,898,728​
55.10​
11​
2,261,096​
43.00​
9​
88%​
Indiana
11​
40.60​
4​
57.50​
6​
97%​
1​
Iowa
6​
757,580​
45.00​
3​
896,286​
53.20​
3​
99%​
Kansas
6​
41.20​
2​
56.60​
3​
99%​
1​
Kentucky
8​
35.70​
3​
62.60​
5​
98%​
Louisiana
8​
39.80​
3​
58.50​
5​
95%​
Maine
4​
425,962​
53.90​
3​
355,411​
44.20​
1​
99%​
Maryland
10​
62.60​
6​
35.60​
4​
73%​
Massachusetts
11​
65.70​
7​
32.50​
4​
99%​
Michigan
16​
2,768,316​
50.50​
8​
2,632,711​
48.00​
8​
99%​
Minnesota
10​
52.60​
5​
45.40​
5​
99%​
Mississippi
6​
39.20​
2​
59.40​
4​
82%​
Missouri
10​
41.30​
4​
56.90​
6​
97%​
Montana
3​
243,278​
40.60​
1​
340,365​
56.90​
2​
99%​
Nebraska
5​
39.10​
2​
58.80​
3​
99%​
Nevada
6​
588,252​
49.30​
3​
580,605​
48.70​
3​
75%​
New Hampshire
4​
422,756​
52.80​
2​
364,889​
45.60​
2​
99%​
New Jersey
14​
60.70​
8​
38.20​
6​
66%​
New Mexico
5​
54.20​
3​
43.60​
2​
95%​
New York
29​
3,690,372​
55.70​
16​
2,845,188​
43.00​
12​
78%​
1​
North Carolina
15​
2,655,383​
48.70​
7​
2,732,084​
50.10​
8​
94%​
North Dakota
3​
31.90​
1​
65.50​
2​
99%​
Ohio
18​
2,603,731​
45.20​
8​
3,074,418​
53.40​
10​
96%​
Oklahoma
7​
32.30​
2​
65.40​
5​
99%​
Oregon
7​
57.50​
4​
40.20​
3​
87%​
Pennsylvania
20​
3,051,565​
48.10​
10​
3,215,983​
50.70​
10​
89%​
Rhode Island
4​
59.40​
2​
39.20​
2​
96%​
South Carolina
9​
43.30​
4​
55.20​
5​
93%​
South Dakota
3​
35.60​
1​
61.80​
2​
94%​
Tennessee
11​
37.40​
4​
60.70​
7​
97%​
Texas
38​
5,195,186​
46.40​
18​
5,848,303​
52.20​
20​
85%​
Utah
6​
37.90​
2​
58.50​
4​
78%​
Vermont
3​
66.40​
2​
30.80​
1​
92%​
Virginia
13​
54.00​
7​
44.50​
6​
99%​
Washington
12​
60.20​
7​
37.50​
5​
85%​
West Virginia
5​
29.60​
1​
68.70​
3​
99%​
1​
Wisconsin
10​
1,630,542​
49.60​
5​
1,610,007​
48.90​
5​
99%​
Wyoming
3​
26.70​
1​
70.40​
2​
Washington DC
3​
14,449​
5.20​
0​
258,561​
93.40​
3​
538​
267​
266​
5​
 
I will update this as more accurate counts are reported.
This is the first draft showing the breakdown
if ALL electoral votes/states were divided proportionally between Biden/Trump
plus other candidates if they took at least 1 electoral point from the two major candidates' tallies.

Given the contested ballots that can never be fully verified,
I would call this a statistical tie.

By the old rules in the Constitution, the winner would be declared President
and the second highest candidate would be Vice President.

We could agree to have the two Candidates share leadership duties
where one serves "internally" through the media and parties, to facilitate
representation and reforms put forth from the people, while the
other officiates through govt administration to implement that authority into public policy.

I would rather have a strong Conservative/Constitutionalist serve in official govt capacity
to keep the focus within the enumerated duties and limits of govt. And reserve the
more Social Service oriented Candidate on INTERNAL and DOMESTIC affairs where
the public manages our own social, educational and medical programs, instead of
burdening federal and executive authority for issues best addressed democratically per localized districts.

I believe this race is close enough that to protect the best interests of the ENTIRE public,
BOTH the liberal/socialistic approach to govt service and the conservative beliefs in limited
govt for external matters of national security and interstate/international policies only,
we really need BOTH approaches to govt and political beliefs equally represented.

So I would respectfully petition the Electoral College to split their votes PROPORTIONALLY
where neither candidate gets 270 votes, but recognize a TIE between the two top candidates.
And the people who voted meet per district
organized by party, to restructure a system of representation that allows
both candidates and their respective staff to serve as a dual team, serving
both EXTERNAL and INTERNAL positions of govt and delegate duties to
their combined leadership according to the will and authority of the people,
as facilitated by party representation proportional to the people of each
district, city and state.
 
1. OOPS Washington DC had the numbers reversed where Trump's and Biden's totals were exchanged and put in the wrong columns.

2. I retallied all the votes and % based on the final accepted data (still contested for fraud by Trump in lawsuits pending in court)

Biden would get 272 Electoral Votes if split proportionally per state.
So he would still win based on the vote count contested by Trump.

US STATEElectoral VotesBIDEN - 272TRUMP - 257ReportingOTHERS - 9BIDEN = 272TRUMP = 265OTHER = 1
Alabama
9​
1,430,589​
36.40​
3.3​
834,533​
62.50​
5.6​
99%​
0.1​
3.276​
5.625​
0.1​
3​
6​
Alaska
3​
63,992​
33.50​
1​
118,602​
62.10​
1.9​
50%​
0.1​
1.005​
1.863​
0.1​
1​
2​
Arizona
11​
1,627,902​
49.60​
5.5​
1,365,040​
48.90​
5.4​
90%​
0.1​
5.456​
5.379​
0.1​
6​
5​
Arkansas
6​
417,897​
34.60​
2.1​
755,815​
62.60​
3.8​
93%​
0.1​
2.076​
3.756​
0.1​
2​
4​
California
55​
8,998,232​
64.70​
35.6​
4,635,092​
33.30​
18.3​
66%​
1.1​
35.585​
18.315​
1.1​
36​
18​
1​
Colorado
9​
1,753,416​
55.30​
5​
1,335,253​
42.10​
3.8​
95%​
0.2​
4.977​
3.789​
0.2​
5​
4​
Connecticut
7​
1,029,132​
58.10​
4.1​
714,981​
40.40​
2.8​
99%​
0.1​
4.067​
2.828​
0.1​
4​
3​
Delaware
3​
295,403​
58.80​
1.8​
199,829​
39.80​
1.2​
99%​
--
1.764​
1.194​
0​
2​
1​
Florida
29​
5,284,453​
47.90​
13.9​
5,658,847​
51.20​
14.8​
99%​
0.3​
13.891​
14.848​
0.3​
14​
15​
Georgia
16​
2,462,099​
49.50​
7.9​
2,462,099​
49.30​
7.9​
99%​
0.2​
7.92​
7.888​
0.2​
8​
8​
Hawaii
4​
365,802​
63.70​
2.5​
196,602​
34.30​
1.4​
96%​
0.1​
2.548​
1.372​
0.1​
3​
1​
Idaho
4​
286,991​
33.10​
1.3​
554,019​
63.90​
2.6​
99%​
0.1​
1.324​
2.556​
0.1​
1​
3​
Illinois
20​
3,056,219​
55.80​
11.2​
2,316,566​
42.30​
8.5​
88%​
0.3​
11.16​
8.46​
0.3​
11​
9​
Indiana
11​
1,239,401​
41.00​
4.5​
1,725,723​
57.10​
6.3​
99%​
0.2​
4.51​
6.281​
0.2​
5​
6​
Iowa
6​
757,707​
45.00​
2.7​
896,100​
53.20​
3.2​
99%​
0.1​
2.7​
3.192​
0.1​
3​
3​
Kansas
6​
551,144​
41.30​
2.5​
752,903​
56.50​
3.4​
99%​
0.1​
2.478​
3.39​
0.1​
3​
3​
Kentucky
8​
771,884​
36.20​
2.9​
1,325,742​
62.10​
5​
98%​
0.1​
2.896​
4.968​
0.1​
3​
5​
Louisiana
8​
855,597​
39.80​
3.2​
1,255,481​
58.50​
4.7​
95%​
0.1​
3.184​
4.68​
0.1​
3​
5​
Maine
4​
430,023​
52.90​
2.1​
359,502​
44.20​
1.8​
99%​
0.1​
2.116​
1.768​
0.1​
2​
2​
Maryland
10​
1,508,700​
63.30​
6.3​
834,052​
35.00​
3.5​
73%​
0.2​
6.33​
3.5​
0.2​
6​
4​
Massachusetts
11​
2,316,338​
65.60​
7.2​
1,148,777​
32.60​
3.6​
99%​
0.2​
7.216​
3.586​
0.2​
7​
4​
Michigan
16​
2,790,648​
50.60​
8.1​
2,644,525​
47.90​
7.7​
99%​
0.2​
8.096​
7.664​
0.2​
8​
8​
Minnesota
10​
1,717,830​
52.60​
5.3​
1,484,671​
45.40​
4.5​
99%​
0.2​
5.26​
4.54​
0.2​
5​
5​
Mississippi
6​
440,284​
38.80​
2.3​
677,218​
59.70​
3.6​
99%​
0.1​
2.328​
3.582​
0.1​
2​
4​
Missouri
10​
1,242,851​
41.30​
4.1​
1,711,848​
56.90​
5.7​
99%​
0.2​
4.13​
5.69​
0.2​
4​
6​
Montana
3​
243,719​
40.60​
1.2​
341,767​
56.90​
1.7​
99%​
0.1​
1.218​
1.707​
0.1​
1​
2​
Nebraska
5​
367,319​
39.30​
2​
548,462​
58.60​
2.9​
99%​
0.1​
1.965​
2.93​
0.1​
2​
3​
Nevada
6​
642,604​
49.90​
3​
616,905​
47.90​
2.9​
88%​
0.1​
2.994​
2.874​
0.1​
3​
3​
New Hampshire
4​
423,291​
52.80​
2.1​
365,373​
45.60​
1.8​
99%​
0.1​
2.112​
1.824​
0.1​
2​
2​
New Jersey
14​
2,029,493​
58.70​
8.2​
1,385,529​
40.10​
5.6​
77%​
0.2​
8.218​
5.614​
0.2​
8​
6​
New Mexico
5​
496,826​
54.20​
2.7​
400,095​
43.60​
2.2​
99%​
0.1​
2.71​
2.18​
0.1​
3​
2​
New York
29​
3,694,996​
55.70​
16.2​
2,849,085​
43.00​
12.5​
78%​
0.3​
16.153​
12.47​
0.3​
16​
13​
North Carolina
15​
2,658,167​
48.70​
7.3​
2,733,564​
50.10​
7.5​
99%​
0.2​
7.305​
7.515​
0.2​
7​
8​
North Dakota
3​
114,480​
31.90​
1​
234,845​
65.50​
2​
99%​
--
0.957​
1.965​
0​
1​
2​
Ohio
18​
2,603,731​
45.20​
8.1​
3,074,418​
53.40​
9.6​
96%​
0.3​
8.136​
9.612​
0.3​
8​
10​
Oklahoma
7​
503,289​
32.30​
2.3​
1,018,870​
65.40​
4.6​
99%​
0.1​
2.261​
4.578​
0.1​
2​
5​
Oregon
7​
1,304,536​
57.00​
4​
928,706​
40.60​
2.8​
98%​
0.2​
3.99​
2.842​
0.2​
4​
3​
Pennsylvania
20​
3,350,884​
49.70​
9.9​
3,313,529​
49.10​
9.8​
99%​
0.3​
9.94​
9.82​
0.3​
10​
10​
Rhode Island
4​
300,325​
59.40​
2.4​
197,421​
39.10​
1.6​
96%​
--
2.376​
1.564​
0​
2​
2​
South Carolina
9​
757,707​
45.00​
4​
896,100​
53.20​
4.8​
99%​
0.2​
4.05​
4.788​
0.2​
4​
5​
South Dakota
3​
150,467​
35.60​
1.1​
261,035​
61.80​
1.9​
94%​
--
1.068​
1.854​
0​
1​
2​
Tennessee
11​
1,139,666​
37.40​
4.1​
1,849,211​
60.70​
6.7​
99%​
0.2​
4.114​
6.677​
0.2​
4​
7​
Texas
38​
5,217,656​
46.40​
17.6​
5,865,248​
52.20​
19.8​
98%​
0.6​
17.632​
19.836​
0.6​
18​
20​
Utah
6​
489,469​
37.70​
2.3​
759,638​
58.40​
3.5​
93%​
0.2​
2.262​
3.504​
0.2​
2​
4​
Vermont
3​
242,805​
66.40​
2​
112,688​
30.80​
0.9​
92%​
0.1​
1.992​
0.924​
0.1​
2​
1​
Virginia
13​
2,364,396​
54.00​
7​
1,946,868​
44.50​
5.8​
99%​
0.2​
7.02​
5.785​
0.2​
7​
6​
Washington
12​
2,286,324​
58.90​
7.1​
1,498,301​
38.60​
4.6​
85%​
0.3​
7.068​
4.632​
0.3​
7​
5​
West Virginia
5​
232,502​
29.60​
1.5​
539,610​
68.70​
3.4​
99%​
0.1​
1.48​
3.435​
0.1​
2​
3​
Wisconsin
10​
1,630,542​
49.60​
5​
1,610,007​
48.90​
4.9​
99%​
0.1​
4.96​
4.89​
0.1​
5​
5​
Wyoming
3​
73,445​
26.70​
0.8​
193,454​
70.40​
2.1​
97%​
0.1​
0.801​
2.112​
0.1​
1​
2​
W DC
3​
268,625​
93.30​
2.8​
15,075​
5.20​
0.2​
83%​
--
2.799​
0.156​
0​
3​
0​
538​
272.1​
257.1​
8.8​
272​
265​
1​
 

Forum List

Back
Top