how so?Rut roh. Getting on damn shaky ground there, DC.the situation is that the loss of the 2nd amendment right was lost in the convictionPutting Emma's "due process" argument aside, I don't see her position as extreme. In my opinion, it makes logical sense for one to have their II Amendment rights restored, if the government has seen fit to release from prison. If a person is still seen as a real threat and or rehabilitated so as to be part of society again, they shouldn't be released in the first place, in my opinion.
I acknowledge the states have the right to pass laws as they see fit so long as they do not violate the Constitution of the United States. Like Emma, I don't agree with gun control and all that other gun law crap.
just because (without that right) they were not seen as still being a danger to society, doesnt mean that WITH that right they wouldnt be
they know that in releasing them, they wouldnt have the right to own guns, with that right, would you still release them?
i woulndt(of course this is in regard to early release) and the prision times would likely be increased otherwise