SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,493
- 72,459
Fck the White House, Facebook and Psaki.
Some shady shit going on here
Some shady shit going on here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should familiarize yourself with "prior restraint." The only time "false statements of fact" come into play is in defamation cases.you should familiarize yourself with exceptions to free speech; with attention to the section "false statements of fact".
Yes they are.for example, instructions on bomb making arent protected.
Still protected.Misinformation on covid could cause equivalent harm.
You're okay with GOVERNMENT commentary on your free speech?however, i think they are only labelling false statements as such, rather than removing them.
The dumbfuckery is going on right now you stupid ass.You have left out a very important fact here, dblackOr let's flip around. I'm adamantly anti-socialist. If I censor pro-socialist comments on my website, is that a violation of the First? Or is it a valid expression of my values?Should this admonition apply to everyone? I mean, if I have a website, and I agree with the current government that Trumpsters are miscreants, beneath contempt, and ban them from my site - is that a violation of the "spirit" of the First Amendment, of freedom of speech? Or is it actually an expression of freedom of speech? Should I be prohibited from "censoring" them?To be fair...
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The government has made no such law. However I do believe that it has violated the spirit in which the Amendment was made.
If the White House calls you up and says "hey, we want you to censor any anti-socialist stuff on your site" and you weren't doing it before, now what?
You can make all the excuses in the world you want, but you know goddamn well that this is fascist horse shit.
Let's flip it around on you. Government wants socialism. They want to eliminate any anti-socialism statements or comments. They pressure Facebook to kick you the fuck off for saying anything about free speech on any platform not just Facebook. They call up USMB, and tell them, "kick all everybody off who is anti-socialist are we gonna find a reason to fuck you up.". Or, "you don't get all this funding we have sitting around if you don't do it."
Sure - that's dead wrong. If there are threats and coercion going on, and you have evidence of that - let's nail them. But I don't honestly think that's what's going on.
What you pussies are too cowardly to face is that people are fed up with Trumpster dumbfuckery. And a lot of those people run businesses, so they are "colluding" to give you the boot. Too bad. Maybe if you weren't such ignorant jackasses it wouldn't have happened.
Can you produce any evidence of the government "telling" companies to restrict speech they don't like?When a company (i.e. Twitter, etc.) restricts speech on its forums, that's one thing, but when the government "tells" companies to restrict speech they don't like, that is a clear violation of the Constitution's First Amendment. This is a clear matter for the Supreme Court to address when it goes up the judicial chain.
Democrats: Toxic, Nazi-like Fascists.https://www.foxnews.com/media/critics-slam-psaki-white-houseconsulting-facebook-flag-misinformation
Critics roundly condemned the White House after Press Secretary Jen Psaki revealed the Biden administration is working with Facebook to flag "problematic" posts that "spread disinformation" on COVID-19.
On Thursday, Psaki was asked a question regarding the Biden administration’s request for tech companies to be more "aggressive" when policing what they referred to as "misinformation." Psaki revealed that the White House is "in regular touch with social media platforms" to handle it.
COMMENT:
BOOOM!!! That is GOVERNMENT using Facebook as a tool of censorship!!!
1ST AMENDMENT WILL APPLY!!!
![]()
dblack?
![]()
Bitch, what the fuck do you think is happening if the WH Press Sec ADMITS they are telling FB what to "flag"?Can you produce any evidence of the government "telling" companies to restrict speech they don't like?When a company (i.e. Twitter, etc.) restricts speech on its forums, that's one thing, but when the government "tells" companies to restrict speech they don't like, that is a clear violation of the Constitution's First Amendment. This is a clear matter for the Supreme Court to address when it goes up the judicial chain.
You're arguing with the fascist Democrat hivemind.Government cannot censor free speech, either directly or by means of an agent (Facebook).Explain how.Government is censoring free speech.
Do I need to explain more?
Can you produce any evidence of the government "telling" companies to restrict speech they don't like?When a company (i.e. Twitter, etc.) restricts speech on its forums, that's one thing, but when the government "tells" companies to restrict speech they don't like, that is a clear violation of the Constitution's First Amendment. This is a clear matter for the Supreme Court to address when it goes up the judicial chain.
Bitch, what the fuck do you think is happening if the WH Press Sec ADMITS they are telling FB what to "flag"?Can you produce any evidence of the government "telling" companies to restrict speech they don't like?When a company (i.e. Twitter, etc.) restricts speech on its forums, that's one thing, but when the government "tells" companies to restrict speech they don't like, that is a clear violation of the Constitution's First Amendment. This is a clear matter for the Supreme Court to address when it goes up the judicial chain.
We can ASSUME that's what they are doing.
Can you produce any evidence of the government "telling" companies to restrict speech they don't like?When a company (i.e. Twitter, etc.) restricts speech on its forums, that's one thing, but when the government "tells" companies to restrict speech they don't like, that is a clear violation of the Constitution's First Amendment. This is a clear matter for the Supreme Court to address when it goes up the judicial chain.
Cause the bodies are fuckin piling up !https://www.foxnews.com/media/critics-slam-psaki-white-houseconsulting-facebook-flag-misinformation
Critics roundly condemned the White House after Press Secretary Jen Psaki revealed the Biden administration is working with Facebook to flag "problematic" posts that "spread disinformation" on COVID-19.
On Thursday, Psaki was asked a question regarding the Biden administration’s request for tech companies to be more "aggressive" when policing what they referred to as "misinformation." Psaki revealed that the White House is "in regular touch with social media platforms" to handle it.
COMMENT:
BOOOM!!! That is GOVERNMENT using Facebook as a tool of censorship!!!
1ST AMENDMENT WILL APPLY!!!
![]()
dblack?
![]()
This has big fat class action suit written all over it.
Corporations cannot do on behalf of gubmint, what gubmint itself is prohibited from doing.
Nope. Working together for a common purpose does not transform them into a state actor.BOOOM!!! That is GOVERNMENT using Facebook as a tool of censorship!!!
1ST AMENDMENT WILL APPLY!!!
What about the authoritarians who want to force Facebook to use their property in a manner they don’t like?Oh gee, the authoritarian left defends this shit.
Color me shocked![]()
Do you do it on your own or in coordination with the government? IOW, do you get a call from your handler with the week's instructions?Should this admonition apply to everyone? I mean, if I have a website, and I agree with the current government that Trumpsters are miscreants, beneath contempt, and ban them from my site - is that a violation of the "spirit" of the First Amendment, of freedom of speech? Or is it actually an expression of freedom of speech? Should I be prohibited from "censoring" them?To be fair...
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The government has made no such law. However I do believe that it has violated the spirit in which the Amendment was made.
That is the very definition of state action, you cocksucking dumbfuck.Nope. Working together for a common purpose does not transform them into a state actor.BOOOM!!! That is GOVERNMENT using Facebook as a tool of censorship!!!
1ST AMENDMENT WILL APPLY!!!
The state is not controlling Facebook. Facebook is doing it voluntarily.That is the very definition of state action, you cocksucking dumbfuck.