Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,358
The only direct casualty was an unarmed protester being shot by a cop.
A justifiable shoot to keep a violent mob out of the House chamber where some law makers and staff were still holed up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only direct casualty was an unarmed protester being shot by a cop.
Police aren’t needed for a protest.
Police are needed for a riot.
Did you know there was going to be a riot?
By the way, this position is too pathetic to fit all the criticism in one post. I could go on about this response for a lot longer than this.
A justifiable shoot to keep a violent mob out of the House chamber where some law makers and staff were still holed up.
Just shows how made up the whole thing is, they wanted a show trial, they got a show plea bargain.
Damn, are you ever not stupid?? If they wanted a show trial, they wouldn't have offered him a deal to avoid a trial.
Pointing out a samefag is samefagging isn't running away, dippy.
Since the police didn’t make the protestors become violent, it’s not their fault that one of them was shot while rioting.Police are always staged before large protests IN CASE they become violent, or spill out of their planned area, or even counter protesters show up.
NYPD stages extra riot police every time something MAY happen.
A lot of agencies dropped the ball on this.
That's the fault of the police who should have had far more officers available once they knew a protest was going to be in DC.
Of course you're running away. Hurling invective to avoid addressing inconvenient posts on a forum like this is the equivalent of running away.
So BLM wasn't responsible for the summer riots? It was the fault of police for not stopping them?
You really do say the dumbest shit. A person with even a luke warm IQ would realize that is a sign of desperation, not a sound defense of their position.
.Since the police didn’t make the protestors become violent, it’s not their fault that one of them was shot while rioting.
If on January 5th, anyone suggested Trump’s rally was going to turn into a riot, you assholes would have acted so offended.
"Pour encouragement les autres" isn't a justifiable reason for deadly force.
Benedict Babbitt wasn't encouraging anyone. That violent mob was already in the process of breaking in. Someone was going to get shot unless they all backed down. Instead of backing down, she placed herself at the front of that mob. Stupid is as stupid does.
A show plea is better than a show trial, even with the milquetoast defenders they allowed them to have.
A mob is a threat of death or severe injury. I don't get what you are talking about.Figures you don't understand the term. You don't get to use deadly force on one person to convince others to back down.
the others being encouraged were the other people on her 1/2 side of the door.
Show me in deadly force protocols where you can use deadly force as an example to others to stop doing what they are doing.
LOL
You just keep digging. Deeper and deeper with every post. And you keep shifting your position because your position is not rooted in solid ground. Like here. First you say they wanted a trial, then you say they didn't want a trial. Picking your arguments to pieces couldn't be easier.
.
So when does his new trial start?
A mob is a threat of death or severe injury. I don't get what you are talking about.
It doesn't. He'd have to be as dumb as martybegan to seek a new trial.